Am 03.12.2015 um 22:24 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > CentOS should do whatever RHEL/Upstream does. > > Period. I sometimes misguide myself in doing; CentOS = RHEL, but the truth is, that CentOS is not exactly the same as RHEL! > Why the change now? It really does matter, a lot, to those of us who need > to do compliance testing/security checks, etc. all based on "version" > number. I know there is no such thing in practice because of all the > non-sequential updates that happen, but there's a shit-ton of work that we > have to do for each new release, and we have depended in the past on the > versions matching the RHEL ones. Now, they don't, and that's wrong. > > It seems like a minor thing, but in real-world practice it is most > definitely not. As stated by others - this provisioning concept never was supported by CentOS. -- LF