On 12/06/2015 10:11 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:22:15PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:35:58PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> Always Learning wrote: >>> >>>> I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach >>>> to everything. >>> >>> Agreed. >>> But two possibly OT and probably ignorant queries: >>> >>> 1. I am running a standard Centos 32-bit system on my home servers. >>> I keep them up-to-date, but have not re-booted for several months. >>> I see from /etc/centos-release that I am running 7.1. >>> If I re-booted would this become 7.2? >>> >>> 2. If so, is this kernel panic a widespread phenomenon? >> >> You're running the 32-bit AltArch build of CentOS? >> >> The /etc/centos-release is owned by the centos-release package, and >> the contents will be updated when you update that pacakge. A reboot >> won't change that. In the default x86_64 release, I think that you'd >> need to pull updates from the CR repo to get the 7.2.1511 packages, >> still. > > And just look at the confusion -- because the website almost never > mentions 7.1.1053 or 7.2.1511, it can be really hard to understand > this discussion -- one person using "7.1" and "7.2" and the other > using "7.2.1511". Good thing the 2nd person didn't use "7 (1511)", > like the website does. > > Oh, wait: CentOS, love it or leave it. Correct. In fact, I would prefer you leave. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20151207/3e4469a0/attachment-0004.sig>