On Dec 7, 2015 07:45, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > On 12/06/2015 10:11 PM, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 09:22:15PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 06:35:58PM +0000, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >>> Always Learning wrote: > >>> > >>>> I always admire Johnny's prose, passion for Centos and his calm approach > >>>> to everything. > >>> > >>> Agreed. > >>> But two possibly OT and probably ignorant queries: > >>> > >>> 1. I am running a standard Centos 32-bit system on my home servers. > >>> I keep them up-to-date, but have not re-booted for several months. > >>> I see from /etc/centos-release that I am running 7.1. > >>> If I re-booted would this become 7.2? > >>> > >>> 2. If so, is this kernel panic a widespread phenomenon? > >> > >> You're running the 32-bit AltArch build of CentOS? > >> > >> The /etc/centos-release is owned by the centos-release package, and > >> the contents will be updated when you update that pacakge. A reboot > >> won't change that. In the default x86_64 release, I think that you'd > >> need to pull updates from the CR repo to get the 7.2.1511 packages, > >> still. > > > > And just look at the confusion -- because the website almost never > > mentions 7.1.1053 or 7.2.1511, it can be really hard to understand > > this discussion -- one person using "7.1" and "7.2" and the other > > using "7.2.1511". Good thing the 2nd person didn't use "7 (1511)", > > like the website does. > > > > Oh, wait: CentOS, love it or leave it. > > Correct. > > In fact, I would prefer you leave. > > > Really? This is what we're dealing with now? OK. I will recommend we move away from CentOS. Good job. _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >