[CentOS] Design changes are done in Fedora

Sun Jan 11 19:04:32 UTC 2015
Sven Kieske <svenkieske at gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11.01.2015 19:05, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> That sounds like you have collected and counted "votes" pro and
> against systemd.
How could it sound like I collected "votes"? I don't care about votes
when it comes to technical superiority.

> As far as "advantages" are concerned: I didn't see any compared to 
> sysvinit or upstart. I don't care that _laptop_ with systemd starts
> 3 times faster
You are making an excellent job at ignoring my argument.
Again: how do you ensure that your system services are up and running
with sysvinit?

 - it's brilliant when you have to start it right on the
> podium few seconds before giving your presentation. However, my
> life is more influenced by the servers I maintain.
Than how do you maintain servers with sysvinit?


I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the
design goals of systemd and any of the shortcomings of old init systems.


kind regards

Sven
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=0k8p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----