On 17/01/15 09:14 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote: >> On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote: >>> So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be >>> updated. >>> >> >> Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they don't violate >> copyright laws, and links to them on that centos.org/docs page, I'll >> continue perusing and referring to the RHEL 6 and 7 documentation. >> _______________________________________________ > > Alright then. May I suggest a solution that might satisfy both opinions. > > On the documentation page where the links to CentOS [345] are found > place a statement to this effect: > > "CentOS is functionally equivalent to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) > and is based on the same code, as released by Red Hat, and rebuilt by > the CentOS community." At this point briefly explain the moral > conundrum that prevents you from linking directly to the RHEL > documentation. Then provide the appropriate link to the appropriate > RHEL documentation with the explanation that, "this is a link to the > documentation for RHEL upon which CentOS is based." There you have a > disclaimer as well as an attribution. > > What say yea to this proposal? > > An undocumented computer program differs only slightly from a video > game. Both are filled with mysteries, puzzles, and unanswered questions. I think it's a fantastic idea. Any CentOS people care to comment? -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?