On 24/03/2015 18:54, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Frank Cox <theatre at melvilletheatre.com> wrote: >> On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:56:27 -0500 >> Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> Doesn't anyone have a list of the oldest >>> kernel version for each Centos version you could be running and still >>> avoid known problems? >> >> The best answer to your question is "the latest version", since previous versions all have known issues of one kind or another. >> >> It's not a great idea to run outdated Centos systems with known bugs of any kind. > > I can't argue with that (then again, you were running that buggy code > before and happy with it), but having to reboot frequently is not > ideal either, particularly on machines where scheduling downtime is a > fairly involved process. I'm looking for the compromise with the > least pain involved. > Hi Les, https://access.redhat.com/labs/leapsecond/leap_vulnerability.sh If you don't have a subscription then the key bits from the script are: # RHEL 4 needs to be after -89 # RHEL 5 needs to be after -164 # RHEL 6 Affected Versions # 6 GA: All Versions # 6.1: Versions before -131.30.2 # 6.2: Versions before -220.25.1 # 6.3: Versions before -279.5.2 and that the tzdata should be from 2015 Tris ************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify postmaster at bgfl.org The views expressed within this email are those of the individual, and not necessarily those of the organisation *************************************************************