On 2015-11-10, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > I'm fully with you on -o inode64, but I would think it is not inode number > that becomes large with extensive use of hard links, but the space used by > directory data, thus requiring to relocate these once they exceed some > size so ultimately some of them will be pushed beyond 1 TB border > (depending on how the filesystem is used). Someone, correct me if I'm > wrong. Does this answer the question you're asking? I think so but I'm not sure. http://www.xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_is_the_inode64_mount_option_for.3F --keith -- kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us