Hello, On 11 September 2015 at 14:04, Dario Lesca <d.lesca at solinos.it> wrote: > Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha scritto: > > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote > > ... > > > > > > Hi James, thanks for reply. It seems as at SerNet's site have > > > packages > > > for RHEL6/Centos6 only, not for RHEL7/Centos7 or any Fedora > > > versions, > > > at least this. > > > > > > > Indeed but fortunately EL6 has many years ahead of it yet. > > > > > Regarding to Samba4 with MIT in 4.2/4.3 - as I know, 4.2 still is > > > not > > > even in rc, thus final release can be perhaps at the turn of the > > > year. > > > > The rc is due Sep 15th last I heard. > > > > > And when time between releases is approx. 9 month, then we can wait > > > around > > > for year... > > > I'll keep my fingers crossed, that it happen in 4.2 > > > > Andrew Bartlett has expressed an opinion on the samba technical list > > that he'd be in favour of a very short 4.2 cycle if it means getting > > these sort of updates out. > > There is some news for this tread? > > Samba 4.3 is out: > https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.3.0.html > > and into Fedora Development there's already new package: > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x86_64/os/Packages/s/ > > But the "samba-ad" package still missing. > > Someone have more info? > > Many thanks > > It is a decision of red hat over MIT or Heimdal. Red hat chooses MIT and Samba 4 AD chooses Heimdal. You have more info in https://access.redhat.com/discussions/1235263 Regards, -- Oscar Osta Pueyo oostap.listas at gmail.com _kiakli_