Il giorno ven, 11/09/2015 alle 14.25 +0200, Oscar Osta Pueyo ha scritto: > Hello, > > On 11 September 2015 at 14:04, Dario Lesca <d.lesca at solinos.it> > wrote: > > > Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha > > scritto: > > > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz> > > > wrote > > > ... > > > > > > > > Hi James, thanks for reply. It seems as at SerNet's site have > > > > packages for RHEL6/Centos6 only, not for RHEL7/Centos7 or any > > > > Fedora versions, at least this. > > > > > > > > > > Indeed but fortunately EL6 has many years ahead of it yet. > > > > > > > Regarding to Samba4 with MIT in 4.2/4.3 - as I know, 4.2 still > > > > is not even in rc, thus final release can be perhaps at the > > > > turn of the year. > > > > > > The rc is due Sep 15th last I heard. > > > > > > > And when time between releases is approx. 9 month, then we can > > > > wait > > > > around > > > > for year... > > > > I'll keep my fingers crossed, that it happen in 4.2 > > > > > > Andrew Bartlett has expressed an opinion on the samba technical > > > list that he'd be in favour of a very short 4.2 cycle if it means > > > getting these sort of updates out. > > > > There is some news for this tread? > > > > Samba 4.3 is out: > > https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.3.0.html > > > > and into Fedora Development there's already new package: > > > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/x > > 86_64/os/Packages/s/ > > > > But the "samba-ad" package still missing. > > > > Someone have more info? > > > > Many thanks > > > > > > It is a decision of red hat over MIT or Heimdal. Red hat chooses MIT > and Samba 4 AD chooses Heimdal. > > You have more info in https://access.redhat.com/discussions/1235263 Ok, thanks for reply. I read from last message of discussion: > February 9 2015 at 1:54 PM - Razvan Corneliu Vilt say: > > The Samba 4 release in RHEL 7 does not support the Active Directory > Domain Controller role. It is however a good NT4 Style Primary Domain > Controller, a decent SMB3 file server, etc. What's more interesting > is that you CAN make Samba 4 from EL 7 work with FreeIPA for > authentication via NTLM AND Kerberos. I already have implemented this > using the stock Red Hat Packages and authentication works via FreeIPA > using both MS-RPC authentication in NTLM form and Kerberised > authentication. .... > This means that that never will be a samba-ad for redhat/centos. Then, if I as I understand the reply, with Centos7 + Samba 4 in old NT4 -DC mode + Kerberos + FreeIPA ( I do not know what it is FreeIPA) it's possible setup a Linux PDC working with all versions of Windows client, without changing the registry into win7/8 to join to domain? I'm not a guru of Linux, someone can point me to the right way? Many thanks Dario -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 22 con Gnome 3.16)