[CentOS] Google Chrome and CentOS 6?

Mon Apr 18 19:24:45 UTC 2016
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> wrote:
>> Hash: SHA1
>> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>> Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get
>>> this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat
>>> continues to push out updates even. E.g.
>>> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html
>> that looks like Supplementary content - we've never had that before.
>> what we might need to do here is work the upstream beyond Red Hat
>> where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not
>> completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that
>> might be ?
>> regards
>> - --
>> Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project
> I suspect it has to do with their "pepperflash" flash plugin.
> Clearly flash is on the way out, so any support for it is not necessary.

It is indeed not completely open source.  I was told that the agreement
between Red Hat and Google only allows the RPMs for RHEL to be released
to subscribers on the supplemental channel.

Sorry, but I can't release it.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160418/b19843de/attachment-0003.sig>