On 06/21/2016 05:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 10/07/2015 01:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 10/07/2015 11:12 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/06/2015 05:30 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>>> Well I haven't tested out the CentOS 7 for i386 yet as sent in the >>>>> message of 06/02-- >>>>> >>>>> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-June/013426.html >>>>> >>>>> Nor have I seen any additional information. So how is this going? >>>>> I'm almost ready to jump in as I would really prefer to be on >>>>> Gnome 3. >>>>> >>>> >>>> We have moved it into place here, which is where it is going to live >>>> permanently: >>>> >>>> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/os/i386/ >>>> >>> >>> Ok, thanks. I may install this soonish... > > Well I have not gotten to this. Since this is a "community" distro, are > patches and updates provided in the same timeframe as they would be for > CentOS 7 64-bit? > > I don't readily see anything like a SIG mailing list or I'd ask there. > > Thanks. > Yes, I build the 32 bit updates at the same time I build the 64 bit updates, as there are MultiLib packages required for the x86_64 tree. These almost always get pushed at exactly the same time (certainly on the same day) as the 64 bit updates. The one exception to this is the kernel as there are some major differences in kernels. See this to see the diff: http://bit.ly/28LHcgw So kernel updates may take a day or two to build and test. But the good news is, that Gnome bug is now completely gone, so no action required for that any longer. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20160621/7db820a5/attachment-0004.sig>