On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > > > > 1. Is CentOS-7.3 done yet? Answer: NO! > > > > And it is NOT CentOS-7.3 .. it is CentOS-7 (1611) based on RHEL-7.3 > > Sources. The main tree will be labeled '7.3.1611' on the mirrors (along > > side 7.0.1406 and 7.1.1503, and 7.2.1511, all of which are already there) > > > > > Obligatory objection to this version numbering scheme: > > Deviating from RHEL in such a basic way is crazy, dumb, stupid, annoying, > wrong, etc, etc. > > There, done. > > Please, before a new flame, please read all what related with release numbering discussed on June 2014 thread of centos-devel mailing list: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/thread.html with subject CentOS 7 and release numbering started here by Karanbir: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-June/010444.html Thanks, Gianluca