[CentOS] RHEL 7.3 released

Fri Nov 4 14:29:49 UTC 2016
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 11/04/2016 09:15 AM, Mark Haney wrote:
> That's all well and good, but how about you actually include the minor
> number AND the release date?  I.e. 7.3-1104 for CentOS 7.3 released today,
> for example.   I'm all for the SIGs to keep track of their own upstreams,
> but surely there's a better way to do this that doesn't annoy the heck out
> of us Joe-Blows out here.  A lot of us don't have the time (or inclination)
> to deal with oddball version discrepancies when there really doesn't need
> to be.
> I mean, there are dozens of Ubuntu distros and they all use the same basic
> versioning schemes.  (Maybe not a completely fair example, but still.)
>  Isn't the idea with CentOS to be a method of generating a larger testing
> base and interest in RHEL and it's products?  If not, that's how I've
> always seen it, incorrect or not.

I said on the tree it will be 7.3.1611 .. and I don't get to make the
call on this.

This was battle was fought two years ago.

We don't have to like it.

We also don't need to fight it again.

I do what I am told, and I have been told what to do ...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20161104/ee456763/attachment-0004.sig>