On 2/9/2017 2:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > My larger concern is that there *does* seem to be a security issue > with pkexec that has at least two very simple fixes, and that issue > isn't being addressed because of the noise involved in arguing about > pkcheck. There's no security problem in pkcheck, and all of the time > spent insisting that there is serves to further delay fixing pkexec. you realize noone on this email list has anything to do with the source code for this pkcheck thing? CentOS uses the code exactly as is that Red Hat releases. You're tilting at windmills in the wrong country here. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz