[CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
Mark Haney
mark.haney at neonova.netWed Jun 7 15:31:06 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
- Next message: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 06/07/2017 11:24 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > Mark stop with the flame baiting please. > > This is nothing systemd specific - and keep in mind /var/tmp is a > persistent temp area unlike /tmp which as it's tmpfs by default is of > course emptie don boot. I would wholeheartedly disagree. This IS something systemd specific. I have never seen init.d blow itself up over bloody symlinks. The readahead, while /possibly/ nice isn't at all necessary on modern hardware. I want my hardware to boot consistently, not bomb like an Adam Sandler movie because of /symlinks/. But hey, call it flamebait if you want. I'd be willing to bet a year's salary most admins hate systemd with a passion.
- Previous message: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
- Next message: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list