[CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
m.roth at 5-cent.us
m.roth at 5-cent.usWed Jun 7 15:33:56 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
- Next message: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Haney wrote: > On 06/07/2017 11:24 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> >> Mark stop with the flame baiting please. >> >> This is nothing systemd specific - and keep in mind /var/tmp is a >> persistent temp area unlike /tmp which as it's tmpfs by default is of >> course emptie don boot. > I would wholeheartedly disagree. This IS something systemd specific. I > have never seen init.d blow itself up over bloody symlinks. The > readahead, while /possibly/ nice isn't at all necessary on modern > hardware. I want my hardware to boot consistently, not bomb like an > Adam Sandler movie because of /symlinks/. > > But hey, call it flamebait if you want. I'd be willing to bet a year's > salary most admins hate systemd with a passion. > Yup. I have issues with just trying to find out the name of a service to restart.... But let's not go on about it. I just had a throwaway, and really didn't intend to start something like the last flame thread on systemd, that went on for weeks.... mark
- Previous message: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
- Next message: [CentOS] C7, systemd, say what?!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list