Kenneth Porter wrote:
> On 6/7/2017 10:09 AM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
>> I would not call fstab rudimentary.
>
> Perhaps I phrased that poorly. The idea is that fstab provides a minimal
> set of mounts to get off the ground. (My understanding, not saying
> that's how it's designed or intended.)
>
> This follows the packaging pattern that every unique setting goes in its
> own file. You don't disturb or risk breaking other settings when you add
> a new setting, and you can separately package these settings without
> meddling with central files.
Ok, sorta. Thanks for expanding, all.
mark "none o' youse guys had to spend something like six hours
Monday and Tuesday swapping 42 drives in a RAID from 2TB
to 4TB, 6 unscrews, 4 screws....zzzzzzzz"