On 12/6/18 2:30 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 06/12/2018 à 18:54, John Hodrien a écrit : >> >> Do you remember just how bad Gnome3 was in RHEL 7.0? It was unstable >> and insecure, certainly when used with nvidia drivers. I can't see >> how you could justify the effort it would have required to >> effectively support an unsupported version of Gnome3, and backporting >> I think would have been more than deeply unpleasant. > Or they could simply have gone with KDE 4, a stable and mature desktop > at the time RHEL 7.0 was out. And not an abomination that had to be > potty-trained from scratch again while steadily losing features every > other minor upgrade. Well that is one person's opinion on the KDE/GNOME debate .. mine would be slightly different (OK , completely opposite :) To each his own :) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20181207/ca3d8a01/attachment-0004.sig>