[CentOS] ldd question on CentOS 6.8 (64bit)
Leon Fauster
leonfauster at googlemail.comThu Jun 7 13:54:21 UTC 2018
- Previous message: [CentOS] ldd question on CentOS 6.8 (64bit)
- Next message: [CentOS] Slightly OT : write bootable CentOS USB disk under Windows 10 and Mac OS X ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Am 07.06.2018 um 15:43 schrieb ejm <mansky at mindspring.com>: > > Hi all, > > Will ldd display the paths to different libraries depending on their locations? > > I'm trying to build libxml2 version 2.9.6 in /usr/local with a newer version of zlib (1.2.8) than what are in the system folders for CentOS 6.8. > > I get the following output from ldd: > > $ ldd ./libxml2.so > ./libxml2.so: /lib64/libz.so.1: version `ZLIB_1.2.3.3' not found (required by ./libxml2.so) > linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffeb1789000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fce9e824000) > libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fce9e60e000) <-- I expected /usr/local/lib here > libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fce9e389000) > libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fce9dff5000) > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003d52a00000) What about: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib ldd ./libxml2.so -- LF
- Previous message: [CentOS] ldd question on CentOS 6.8 (64bit)
- Next message: [CentOS] Slightly OT : write bootable CentOS USB disk under Windows 10 and Mac OS X ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list