[CentOS] ldd question on CentOS 6.8 (64bit)

Thu Jun 7 13:54:21 UTC 2018
Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>

> Am 07.06.2018 um 15:43 schrieb ejm <mansky at mindspring.com>:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Will ldd display the paths to different libraries depending on their locations?
> 
> I'm trying to build libxml2 version 2.9.6 in /usr/local with a newer version of  zlib  (1.2.8) than what are in the system folders for CentOS 6.8.
> 
> I get the following output from ldd:
> 
> $ ldd ./libxml2.so
> ./libxml2.so: /lib64/libz.so.1: version `ZLIB_1.2.3.3' not found (required by ./libxml2.so)
> 	linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007ffeb1789000)
> 	libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00007fce9e824000)
> 	libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007fce9e60e000)   <-- I expected /usr/local/lib here
> 	libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007fce9e389000)
> 	libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fce9dff5000)
> 	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003d52a00000)

What about:

LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib ldd ./libxml2.so

--
LF