On 14.12.2020 22:39, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 12/14/20 4:09 PM, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote: >> On 14.12.2020 21:41, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >>> Le 14/12/2020 à 15:25, James Pearson a écrit : >>>> As others have said, it misses the _really_ important bit about the >>>> traditional CentOS model which is to follow the RHEL ~10 year life cycle [...] >>> And I published the link to the article because it's a fine text and >> nicely argumented. >> >> Well, it's mostly emotional (the leitmotif: "how can you say CentOS >> Stream is bad if you didn't try it?"). And the author's bio spoils the >> fun, as well: >> >> "Ben Porter is a Linux and open source advocate, currently working as an >> OpenShift consultant for Red Hat." >> >> And the comments to the graphs, where RHEL, CentOS and Fedora are placed >> on a line, are simply ridiculous (such as "did you use to consider RHEL >> to be the CentOS beta?"). With all due respect to Ben Porter, it didn't >> convince me. > > I have posted a comment that explains why and on which topic he is > wrong. You post them and I will debunk them :-) Well, arguing with you in that Medium blog would be counter-productive: - as far as I see, we share similar viewpoints on CentOS situation - your response is very detailed, it would make little sense elaborating it -- Sincerely, Konstantin Boyandin system administrator (ProWide Labs Ltd. - IPHost Network Monitor)