Arm-dev December 2016

arm-dev@lists.centos.org

19 participants
21 discussions

Gigabyte MP30-AR0
by Gordan Bobic 09 Oct '24

09 Oct '24

Hi, I am toying with the idea of getting a Gigabyte MP30-AR0 board (despite the insanely exorbitant price tag). Has anyone got the aarch64 CentOS working on one of those? Any special instructions? Also, if I get the ISO, is it bootable on aarch64? Does the installer work? Or does the image have to be used like on 32-bit ARM? Thanks. Gordan

11 198

Request for a new package: raspberrypi-vc
by Jordi Sanfeliu 13 Sep '17

13 Sep '17

Hello, Following the Fabian Arrotin recommendation, I open here the request to include the 'raspberrypi-vc' package into the CentOS 7 EPEL repository, or in the main tree. This package includes a command called 'vcgencmd' which offers a set of interesting values of the Raspberry Pi board; e.g. its temperature. Check here <http://www.elinux.org/RPI_vcgencmd_usage> for more information. I've downloaded the SRPM package from here <http://www.squeezecommunity.org/repo/fedora/24/pi/SRPMS/raspberrypi-vc-2016…>, and I realized that it was pretty easy to build on a full-updated CentOS 7 (kernel 4.4.14-v7). The following are the small modifications I made on the .spec file to accomplish it: --- raspberrypi-vc.spec 2016-07-05 23:23:13.000000000 +0200 +++ raspberrypi-vc.spec.ok 2016-07-13 12:14:39.494059817 +0200 @@ -21,12 +21,12 @@ Patch1: raspberrypi-vc-EGL-dep.patch # dtoverlay -BuildRequires: libfdt-devel >= 1.4.1-501.gitbeef80b%{?dist} +##BuildRequires: libfdt-devel >= 1.4.1-501.gitbeef80b%{?dist} Requires: libfdt >= 1.4.1-501.gitbeef80b%{?dist} BuildRequires: cmake, gcc-c++ -ExclusiveArch: armv6hl armv7hnl +ExclusiveArch: armv7hl %description Libraries, utilities and demos for the Raspberry Pi BCM2835/6 SOC GPU @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ %package libs Summary: Libraries for accessing the Raspberry Pi GPU -Requires: %{name}-firmware >= 20150212git47bd0f0-501 +##Requires: %{name}-firmware >= 20150212git47bd0f0-501 #Provides: libEGL.so #Provides: libGLESv1_CM.so The build generated successfully the following packages: [root@rpi3 rpmbuild]# l -R RPMS/ RPMS/: total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 26 15:59 armv7hl drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 13 12:23 noarch RPMS/armv7hl: total 1352 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 552156 Jul 13 12:22 raspberrypi-vc-libs-20160705-501.git0b8c195.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 340184 Jul 13 12:22 raspberrypi-vc-libs-devel-20160705-501.git0b8c195.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 244960 Jul 13 12:23 raspberrypi-vc-static-20160705-501.git0b8c195.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 241332 Jul 13 12:23 raspberrypi-vc-utils-20160705-501.git0b8c195.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm RPMS/noarch: total 30688 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 31420584 Jul 13 12:23 raspberrypi-vc-demo-source-20160705-501.git0b8c195.el7.centos.noarch.rpm The installation worked finely: # [root@rpi3 armv7hl]# rpm -ivh raspberrypi-vc-utils-20160705-501.git0b8c195.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm raspberrypi-vc-libs-20160705-501.git0b8c195.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm Preparing... ################################# [100%] Updating / installing... 1:raspberrypi-vc-libs-20160705-501.################################# [ 50%] 2:raspberrypi-vc-utils-20160705-501################################# [100%] Then a simple command to get the temperature: [root@rpi3 ~]# vcgencmd measure_temp temp=47.2'C Thanks. -- Jordi Sanfeliu FIBRANET Network Services Provider http://www.fibranet.cat

4 5

Kernel for BananaPi R1 (Lamobo R1)
by mo.ucina 12 May '17

12 May '17

Hello Guys, I have been compiling the Fedora 4.4.2-300 kernel for Centos , using the new Centos image for the Banana-pi . I have used the Fedora src rpm and then added the patch for the switch drivers specific for R1 (Lamobo R1) , then compiled it within the Centos dev arm environment I have . I ran into a couple of things : one cosmetic , the other one not so . Firstly the cosmetic one is that my packages came out looking like this : -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 49332 Feb 26 07:27 kernel-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 87721969 Feb 26 07:27 kernel-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 18785384 Feb 26 07:29 kernel-core-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 10452672 Feb 26 07:30 kernel-devel-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 1012496 Feb 26 07:27 kernel-headers-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 11844188 Feb 26 07:31 kernel-modules-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 925980 Feb 26 07:31 kernel-modules-extra-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 105452 Feb 26 07:27 kernel-tools-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 65356 Feb 26 07:27 kernel-tools-libs-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 52160 Feb 26 07:27 kernel-tools-libs-devel-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl.rpm They all have "centos" as part of the name , which I did not expect . I did not get that when compiling in Fedora. How do you remove that ? Second observation , a one that is a bit of a concern is that , after installing the new kernel I am missing bits : user@bananapi /boot $ ls -l total 43611 drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 1024 Feb 25 22:21 38f5ec9e217b471e8adee477d933f640 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 171924 Nov 26 00:43 config-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 15360 Dec 3 14:37 dtb-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 1024 Dec 3 14:47 extlinux drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root 1024 Jan 1 1970 grub -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 34922581 Dec 3 14:46 initramfs-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl.img -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 592347 Dec 3 14:37 initrd-plymouth.img drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 1024 Dec 3 14:44 loader drwx------. 2 root root 12288 Dec 3 14:31 lost+found -rw-------. 1 root root 2879429 Nov 26 00:43 System.map-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 5866104 Nov 26 00:43 vmlinuz-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl I expected that I would be missing 'initramfs' as the install prog is still work-in-progress. And I was prepared to create it with dracut . However I did not expect not to be missing all the other bits such as : config , dtb, system.map, vmlinuz . I did find my new kernel it was in that dir with a hex name : user@bananapi /boot $ ls -l 38f5ec9e217b471e8adee477d933f640/* 38f5ec9e217b471e8adee477d933f640/0-rescue: total 40652 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 35427302 Dec 3 14:43 initrd -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 6033128 Feb 25 22:26 linux 38f5ec9e217b471e8adee477d933f640/4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl: total 39995 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 34923169 Dec 3 14:40 initrd -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5866104 Dec 3 14:44 linux 38f5ec9e217b471e8adee477d933f640/4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl: total 41061 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 35844934 Feb 25 22:24 initrd -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 6033128 Feb 25 22:36 linux So my question is how do I go from these 2 files above , to the situation where I can boot into the new kernel 4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.centos.armv7hl . Best Regards Milorad PS Once I have verified that the switch driver works , I will post it here .

5 13

I2C in Centos 7
by cjvijf＠gmail.com 29 Jan '17

29 Jan '17

Hello, I am running Centos on a raspberry pi 2b. (I downloaded the image from: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/armv7hl/rpi2/images/ rpi2-centos-image.img.xz ) and installed the i2c libraries and modules for i2c. [root@rpi2-2 ~]# lsmod | grep i2c i2c_bcm2708 5006 0 i2c_dev 6027 0 From what I read that should be correct device file is there too: crw------- 1 root root 89, 1 Dec 31 1969 i2c-1 kernel: Linux rpi2-2 3.18.14-v7+ #794 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jun 7 12:50:51 BST 2015 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux However, when I scan the i2c bus with 'i2cdetect -y 1' I don't see any devices (and I tried 2 that I know work). is the I2C stuff in this kernel working? (or is there a newer kernel version?) thanks, Ron P.S. I know this is an arm-dev list, but figured the I2C topic would fit better here than in a general Centos list

2 1

[PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Don't retrain link if ASPM not possible.
by Vadim Lomovtsev 04 Jan '17

04 Jan '17

From: David Daney <david.daney(a)cavium.com> Some (defective) PCIe devices are not able to reliably do link retraining. Check to see if ASPM is possible between link partners before configuring common clocking, and doing the resulting link retraining. If ASPM is not possible, there is no reason to risk losing access to a device due to an unnecessary link retraining. Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney(a)cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Vadim Lomovtsev <Vadim.Lomovtsev(a)caviumnetworks.com> --- drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c index 2dfe7fd..abad79e 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c @@ -351,12 +351,26 @@ static void pcie_aspm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist) return; } + /* Get upstream/downstream components' register state */ + pcie_get_aspm_reg(parent, &upreg); + child = list_entry(linkbus->devices.next, struct pci_dev, bus_list); + pcie_get_aspm_reg(child, &dwreg); + + /* + * If ASPM not supported, don't mess with the clocks and link, + * bail out now. + */ + if (!(upreg.support & dwreg.support)) + return; + /* Configure common clock before checking latencies */ pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock(link); - /* Get upstream/downstream components' register state */ + /* + * Re-read upstream/downstream components' register state + * after clock configuration + */ pcie_get_aspm_reg(parent, &upreg); - child = list_entry(linkbus->devices.next, struct pci_dev, bus_list); pcie_get_aspm_reg(child, &dwreg); /* -- 2.5.5

2 2

[PATCH] Add ConnectX-4 Ethernet support
by Christopher Covington 04 Jan '17

04 Jan '17

Enable Ethernet mode for the Mellanox ConnectX-4 (mlx5 driver), which some users may choose as a high-speed network interface. Signed-off-by: Christopher Covington <cov(a)codeaurora.org> --- SOURCES/config-centos-sig | 1 + SPECS/kernel-aarch64.spec | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/SOURCES/config-centos-sig b/SOURCES/config-centos-sig index 7cb8462..20bab07 100644 --- a/SOURCES/config-centos-sig +++ b/SOURCES/config-centos-sig @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_CORE=m CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=m CONFIG_I2C_DESIGNWARE_PCI=m CONFIG_THUNDER_NIC_RGX=m +CONFIG_MLX5_CORE_EN=y diff --git a/SPECS/kernel-aarch64.spec b/SPECS/kernel-aarch64.spec index d510657..f781578 100644 --- a/SPECS/kernel-aarch64.spec +++ b/SPECS/kernel-aarch64.spec @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Summary: The Linux kernel %define rpmversion 4.5.0 %define pkgrelease 15.el7 -%define centupdate 19.el7 +%define centupdate 20.el7 # allow pkg_release to have configurable %{?dist} tag %define specrelease %%SPECRELEASE%% @@ -1500,6 +1500,9 @@ fi %kernel_variant_files %{with_debug} kernel-debug debug %changelog +* Tue Dec 13 2016 Christopher Covington <cov(a)codeaurora.org> [4.5.0-20.el7] +- Add Mellanox ConnectX-4 Ethernet support + * Mon Nov 21 2016 Jim Perrin <jperrin(a)centos.org> [4.5.0-19.el7] - Add various ThunderX patches from arm-dev list. -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

2 1

SELinux message
by Robert Moskowitz 28 Dec '16

28 Dec '16

This is using the CUbieTruck image. When I did the yum update I saw: [ 11.948082] SELinux: Class binder not defined in policy. [ 11.953578] SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be allowed Later, when I was setting up a policy for moving SSH port: # semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp 789 <- (not the real number) I again saw: [ 2273.047017] SELinux: Class binder not defined in policy. [ 2273.052531] SELinux: the above unknown classes and permissions will be allowed What is going on here? Is this something that should be 'fixed'? Bob

1 4

How to chroot from x86 to arm?
by mo.ucina 27 Dec '16

27 Dec '16

Hello Guys, I have been doing centos package compiling on arm hardware for a while now , and it has been going OK . One drawback is that some bigger packages would run for 10hrs to compile . I would like to speed up that process , and compile on a much more powerful machine . I tried cross-compiling but ended up with issues when the arm package got contaminated with i386 libraries no matter what I tired . I also tried qemu VM running on my core2duo 4 core desktop machine . This worked OK as packages were perfect , but it was slower to compile than using arm hardware . Same package that took 10 hrs on arm hw , compiled for 3 and a half days on the desktop . My question is if I used a chroot approach to run the emulation will this be quicker than a qemu VM . If so can anyone please share their instructions on how to configure a chroot to run a centos 7 arm image on a x86 desktop. Best Regards Milorad

6 8

SElinux st failed
by Robert Moskowitz 26 Dec '16

26 Dec '16

This is on a Cubieboard2 with the OS on a sata HD: I followed the instructions on the wiki vi /etc/sysconfig/selinux <- change from "permissive" to "enforcing" vi /boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf <- change the "enforce=0" to "enforce=1" touch /.autorelabel I then rebooted and the following appears on the console log: [ OK ] Reached target Switch Root. Starting Switch Root... [ 10.682159] systemd-journald[129]: Received SIGTERM from PID 1 (systemd). [ 11.306507] systemd[1]: Failed to load SELinux policy. [!!!!!!] Failed to load SELinux policy, freezing. Note that /boot is sda1 and / is sda3 I am awaiting guidance. thank you

4 12

Re: [Arm-dev] Need instructions on how to expand CentOS on RaspberryPI
by dave.a.florek＠gmail.com 26 Dec '16

26 Dec '16

Hi Kananbir, I completely missed that. Got the results I wanted. I’m not sure I would have found that anywhere on the CentOS website. Sincerely, Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Karanbir Singh Sent: 25 décembre 2016 08:51 To: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware; Dave Florek Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Need instructions on how to expand CentOS on RaspberryPI There is a readme file in root's home dir. Were you able to look at that process ? On 25 December 2016 12:21:15 GMT+00:00, Dave Florek <dave.a.florek(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi, I need some instructions on how to expand the CentOS 7 ARM image for Raspberry PI 2. I followed several instructions including here: https://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/questions/499/how-can-i-resize-my-roo… They don’t help. I reboot my PI and it goes into a Kernel Panic right after formatting with fdisk. The /root-partion command also doesn’t work with my 64Gb card. Thanks, Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Arm-dev December 2016