Arm-dev June 2016

arm-dev@lists.centos.org

16 participants
15 discussions

Aarch64 disk image
by Marcin Trendota 17 Jun '16

17 Jun '16

Hello I'm trying to download disk image for aarch64 but it's not available: The requested URL /altarch/7/isos/aarch64/CentOS-7-aarch64.img.xz was not found on this server. (from this link: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/aarch64/CentOS-7-aarch64.img.xz) Same for "rolling disk image". Is this intended? (sorry for posting this message to centos-devel list - my mistake). -- Over And Out MoonWolf

4 4

Re: [Arm-dev] [CentOS-devel] Rebuilding OpenStack for AArch64
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 15 Jun '16

15 Jun '16

On 10/06/16 14:04, Thomas Oulevey wrote: >>> How we can proceed? I think that first idea is good as it allows us to do >>> builds without touching x86-64 tag before we are ready for merging. But I do >>> not have koji experience so may be wrong. >> >> New tag is the way to go, we don't want to block x86_64. >> > > +1 > > The status, we have a blocker with mergerepo / mergerepo_c [1] which are > not merging package with a dist tag different on the source package and > the binary. > [1]: > > $ repoquery > --repofrompath=reponame,http://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/repos/storage7-ceph-jewel-el7-build/latest/aarch64/ > --repoid=reponame -q json-c > > return no result > > The mergerepo tasks (mergerepo_c because it is more verbose, same issue > with mergerepo): > https://cbs.centos.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/4276/94276/mergerepos.log > > """ > 19:33:02: Reading metadata for json-c (0.11-4.el7.aarch64) > 19:33:02: Package json-c has forbidden srpm json-c-0.11-4.el7.src.rpm > """ This is because of 0.11-4.el7_0 on x86 compared to 0.11-4.el7 on aarch64, right? Should be fixable if we rebuild json-c 0.11-4.el7_0 on aarch64 and update repositories? Is there a tool to use which would list such differences?

1 1

Re: [Arm-dev] Rebuilding OpenStack for AArch64
by Itamar Reis Peixoto 10 Jun '16

10 Jun '16

Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz(a)linaro.org> wrote: There were discussions on irc about it but I lost track of who I should speak with etc so decided to write to mailing list instead. The goal is to rebuild OpenStack 'mitaka' packages for AArch64 (AltArch) in CBS (there is one builder for this architecture). Question is how to make it in best way? One of ideas was: 1. create new tag (cloud7-openstack-mitaka-candidate-aarch64?) 2. import all 'noarch' builds from cloud7-openstack-mitaka-* tags 3. send all required packages to the builder 4. test resulting packages 5. import/merge all of them to proper cloud7-openstack-mitaka-* tag Other was about doing scratch builds and merging them with x86-64 ones. How we can proceed? I think that first idea is good as it allows us to do builds without touching x86-64 tag before we are ready for merging. But I do not have koji experience so may be wrong. --- build same sources, and fix in same repo ? Sent from my BLU smartphone device

1 0

Rebuilding OpenStack for AArch64
by Marcin Juszkiewicz 10 Jun '16

10 Jun '16

There were discussions on irc about it but I lost track of who I should speak with etc so decided to write to mailing list instead. The goal is to rebuild OpenStack 'mitaka' packages for AArch64 (AltArch) in CBS (there is one builder for this architecture). Question is how to make it in best way? One of ideas was: 1. create new tag (cloud7-openstack-mitaka-candidate-aarch64?) 2. import all 'noarch' builds from cloud7-openstack-mitaka-* tags 3. send all required packages to the builder 4. test resulting packages 5. import/merge all of them to proper cloud7-openstack-mitaka-* tag Other was about doing scratch builds and merging them with x86-64 ones. How we can proceed? I think that first idea is good as it allows us to do builds without touching x86-64 tag before we are ready for merging. But I do not have koji experience so may be wrong.

1 0

MP3-AR0 - Limiting SATA Speed
by Gordan Bobic 08 Jun '16

08 Jun '16

Is there a way to tell u-boot (or Tianocore) on the MP30-AR0 to limit the SATA port speeds to 3Gbit instead of auto-negotiating 6Gbit? I have a case with a SATA backplane that doesn't work properly at 6Gbit, and this sometimes causes the boot to fail. If I can get it to get as far as loading the Linux kernel, it's OK as I can specify a boot parameter there to limit it, but a non-trivial fraction of the time it doesn't get that far without erroring out. TIA. Gordan

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Arm-dev June 2016