November 2018 - Arm-dev - lists.centos.org

Gigabyte MP30-AR0
by Gordan Bobic 09 Oct '24

09 Oct '24

Hi, I am toying with the idea of getting a Gigabyte MP30-AR0 board (despite the insanely exorbitant price tag). Has anyone got the aarch64 CentOS working on one of those? Any special instructions? Also, if I get the ISO, is it bootable on aarch64? Does the installer work? Or does the image have to be used like on 32-bit ARM? Thanks. Gordan

11 198

centos 7 64 bit on raspberry Pi 3
by R 23 Sep '20

23 Sep '20

Hello, I was wondering if there is a procedure for installing Centos 7 on the Raspberry Pi 3 B+ while installing Centos 7.5 on armhfp is very clear and documented given that a raw root image is provided and you just "dd" it on the memory card, it is not clear to me how to do it with aarch64. A ISO image is provided but how to install it on the raspberry ? thank you Rick

6 16

epel-release
by Robert Moskowitz 30 Jun '20

30 Jun '20

Ok, I see this epel-release in the epel1 repo that I installed via the wiki. So I decide to install it, and it created an epel.repo.rpmnew file. I swicth around the files and try a 'yum update' and get: epel/armhfp/metalink | 47 kB 00:00 Could not parse metalink https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=armhfp error was No repomd file One of the configured repositories failed (Unknown), and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the only safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work "fix" this: .... File /var/cache/yum/armhfp/7/epel/metalink.xml does not exist So I put everything back.

3 7

Re: [Arm-dev] Add Marvell Armada7k8k NIC (mvpp2) support patches
by Marcin Wojtas 26 May '20

26 May '20

Hi Jim, It's been a while, since I sent the patch. Any objections about merging? Is v4.11 kernel still a valid baseline or for the next releases or we should use v4.14? When is that transition and next release supposed to happen? Best regards, Marcinsob., 23 cze 2018 o 08:18 Marcin Wojtas <mw(a)semihalf.com> napisał(a): > > Hi, > > I'm sending a patch that is applicable on top of the kernel > sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch. It enables ACPI support for the Marvell > Armada7k8k NIC - this required backporting very big amount of patches > (all merged upstream), hence I decided to attach the single commit, > instead of issueing 'git send-email' of it. > > Despite many attempts I wasn't able to build entire rpm package with > the mock build utility, however I managed to test the clean kernel > v4.11 with applied all patches and built with updated .config. Please > let know if this patch is sufficient and can be merged. > > Thanks, > Marcin

5 21

Different issues with "DTOVERLAY".
by Stephan Guilloux 26 Feb '19

26 Feb '19

Hello, Small issues, today, with dtoverlay gpio-shutdown/poweroff [root@mypi ~]# dtoverlay gpio-shutdown su: user pi does not exist * Failed to apply overlay '1_gpio-shutdown' (kernel) su: user pi does not exist [root@mypi ~]# dtoverlay gpio-poweroff su: user pi does not exist su: user pi does not exist [root@mypi ~]# Even if I add a fake user "PI", this does not work better. [root@mypi ~]# useradd -r pi -p pi [root@mypi ~]# [root@mypi ~]# [root@mypi ~]# dtoverlay gpio-poweroff * Failed to apply overlay '2_gpio-poweroff' (kernel) [root@mypi ~]# dtoverlay gpio-shutdown * Failed to apply overlay '2_gpio-shutdown' (kernel) [root@mypi ~]# But when I check the overlay list, I get: [root@mypi ~]# dtoverlay -l Overlays (in load order): 0: gpio-shutdown 1: gpio-poweroff [root@mypi ~]# At least, something is done :-) Last problems: [root@mypi ~]# dtoverlay -h gpio-shutdown * Help file not found [root@mypi ~]# dtoverlay -h gpio-poweroff * Help file not found [root@mypi ~]# dtoverlay -h rpi-rtc * Help file not found [root@mypi ~]# dtoverlay -h rpi-display * Help file not found [root@mypi ~]# In case ... [root@mypi ~]# cat /proc/version Linux version 4.14.65-v7.1.el7 (mockbuild(a)armhfp-03.bsys.centos.org) (gcc version 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-28) (GCC)) #1 SMP Mon Aug 20 19:04:20 UTC 2018 [root@mypi ~]# [root@mypi ~]# rpm -qa 'raspberrypi-vc*' raspberrypi-vc-demo-source-20170705-502.gitaa39775.el7.noarch raspberrypi-vc-libs-20170705-502.gitaa39775.el7.armv7hl raspberrypi-vc-utils-20170705-502.gitaa39775.el7.armv7hl [root@mypi ~]# Stephan.

2 3

Odroid-HC1 came, but
by Robert Moskowitz 28 Nov '18

28 Nov '18

got myself an ODroid-HC1, but seems I forgot some things... Power supply! I have a right sized barrel to USB cable, but my Ankar is rated up to 3A and is fused at any draw above that. I remember looking at power supplies before, but can't find the link. UART to USB. The ones I have won't fit. They are for connecting to pins, not a connector like the HC1 has. What do I get? Plus what are the pin-outs? I really need to get a schematic for this... Case cover. For some strange reason, I thought it would come with a cover. I see now, that if you stack them you only need one cover, so it is most likely a separate order. The unit came with a small bag with 2 screws, but I cannot find any holes in the case for any screws! Strange. So after I get at least the power supply and UART to USB for console, I will be asking how to get this to boot completely from the HD like I do with my Cubies! thanks Bob

2 5

back at it
by Robert Moskowitz 22 Nov '18

22 Nov '18

Oct 27th I was the pedestrian in a pedestrian/auto accident. Healing well enough. PT for walking and that should correct in a couple weeks. Dislocated right shoulder and that is the real limiter for the next 4 weeks. Affects my typing and mousing. Plus for the work here, reaching for and doing all I do with my arm boards. Thus I hope now to spend some time on Centos/Fedora arm work, but reduced until the arm is out of the sling. Bob

3 2

Re: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1
by Mark Verlinde 13 Nov '18

13 Nov '18

Hi, No errors or misbehavior sofar after updating to php72-7.2.11-1. This for the installed requirements of nextcloud as shown below. Installed from community-SCLs_php72-testing: php72-1.0-1.el7.armv7hl php72-runtime-1.0-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-cli-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-common-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-fpm-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-gd-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-intl-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-json-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-ldap-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-mbstring-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-mysqlnd-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-opcache-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-pdo-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-pear-1.10.5-5.el7.noarch php72-php-process-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl php72-php-xml-7.2.11-1.el7.armv7hl Installed (local) SCL's rebuilds: php72-php-smbclient-0.9.0-3.ns7.armv7hl php72-php-pecl-zip-1.15.2-1.ns7.armv7hl php72-php-pecl-mcrypt-1.0.1-7.ns7.armv7hl php72-php-pecl-apcu-5.1.9-1.ns7.armv7hl Mark Verlinde -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Afzender: Pablo Sebastián Greco<pablo(a)fliagreco.com.ar> Verstuurd: Vrijdag 2 November 2018 11:20 Aan: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware <arm-dev(a)centos.org> Onderwerp: Re: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1 Mark, just removed the wrong build and pushed the right one, it should appear there in a few hours. Thanks for reporting!. Pablo. El 2/11/18 a las 06:51, Mark Verlinde escribió: -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Afzender:Mark Verlinde <mark(a)havak.nl> <mailto:mark@havak.nl> Verstuurd: Vrijdag 2 November 2018 9:16 Aan: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware <arm-dev(a)centos.org> <mailto:arm-dev@centos.org> Onderwerp: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1 Hi, In the community-SCLs_php72-testing repository php-7.2.11-1 showed up. Again, thank you for the effort! We would like to test them but they turn out to be opt-in packages; Looks like the %scl tag was not set during the build. Jumped to a wrong conclusion here, sorry for that. The spec in the source package is not converted for a sclo-build. Could someone reissue the build with the proper buildtag? Rephrase: Is it possible to reissue the build from a sclo enabled (remi safe) source package? With the promise we report our findings, Mark Verlinde _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev(a)centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev> _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev(a)centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev> _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev(a)centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev

2 1

Re: [Arm-dev] Kernel 4.19.1
by Mark Verlinde 13 Nov '18

13 Nov '18

Hi, No anomalies on my Orange Pi Plus 2E (SOC: Allwinner H3), Did not check video (HDMI-Out) yet; It did not work with the kernel 4.18.x. Using it headless anyway it did/does not have any prio for me. Mark Verlinde -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Afzender:Pablo Sebastián Greco <pablo(a)fliagreco.com.ar> > Verstuurd: Zaterdag 10 November 2018 12:57 > Aan: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware <arm-dev(a)centos.org> > Onderwerp: [Arm-dev] Kernel 4.19.1 > > > In a few hours, hopefully, there will be a kernel 4.19.1 for armhfp > landing here https://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/community-kernel-latest/ > That kernel is almost the same as fedora, with only a few tweaks, but > since it is all very new, please test carefully, and report back. > > Don't say I didn't warn you.... :D > > Pablo. > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >

2 1

kernel source aarch64
by Skorpeo Skorpeo 13 Nov '18

13 Nov '18

Hi, If I want to make changes to the config and recompile the kernel where can I get the kernel sources for aarch64? Thanks much!

2 1

Kernel 4.19.1
by Pablo Sebastián Greco 10 Nov '18

10 Nov '18

In a few hours, hopefully, there will be a kernel 4.19.1 for armhfp landing here https://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/community-kernel-latest/ That kernel is almost the same as fedora, with only a few tweaks, but since it is all very new, please test carefully, and report back. Don't say I didn't warn you.... :D Pablo.

1 0

Re: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1
by Mark Verlinde 02 Nov '18

02 Nov '18

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Afzender:Mark Verlinde <mark(a)havak.nl> > Verstuurd: Vrijdag 2 November 2018 9:16 > Aan: Conversations around CentOS on ARM hardware <arm-dev(a)centos.org> > Onderwerp: [Arm-dev] Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1 > > > > Hi, > > In the community-SCLs_php72-testing repository php-7.2.11-1 showed up. > Again, thank you for the effort! > > We would like to test them but they turn out to be opt-in packages; > Looks like the %scl tag was not set during the build. > Jumped to a wrong conclusion here, sorry for that. The spec in the source package is not converted for a sclo-build. > Could someone reissue the build with the proper buildtag? Rephrase: Is it possible to reissue the build from a sclo enabled (remi safe) source package? > > With the promise we report our findings, > > Mark Verlinde > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev(a)centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev >

2 1

Armhfp community-SCLs_php72-testing v7.2.11-1
by Mark Verlinde 02 Nov '18

02 Nov '18

Hi, In the community-SCLs_php72-testing repository php-7.2.11-1 showed up. Again, thank you for the effort! We would like to test them but they turn out to be opt-in packages; Looks like the %scl tag was not set during the build. Could someone reissue the build with the proper buildtag? With the promise we report our findings, Mark Verlinde

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Arm-dev November 2018