Arm-dev

arm-dev@lists.centos.org

686 discussions

Missing packages/groups in armhfp repo
by Adam Bishop 05 Apr '16

05 Apr '16

I just deployed the raspberry pi image for some testing and found a couple of rough edges with the armhfp port. Mock doesn't work out of the box; it'd be nice if it shipped with a working config file, but after having written one builds are failing because the @buildsys-build yum group is not available. I can probably work around this by specifying the list of packages needed for the buildroot manually, but I suspect that the group may not exist because some required packages are missing. I've confirmed that httpd-devel and apr-devel are not present in the repository; is this an oversight or is there a problem building them for arm? Regards, Adam Bishop Systems Development Specialist gpg: 0x6609D460 t: +44 (0)1235 822 245 xmpp: adamb(a)jabber.dev.ja.net jisc.ac.uk Jisc is a registered charity (number 1149740) and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under Company No. 5747339, VAT No. GB 197 0632 86. Jisc’s registered office is: One Castlepark, Tower Hill, Bristol, BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800. Jisc Services Limited is a wholly owned Jisc subsidiary and a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under company number 2881024, VAT number GB 197 0632 86. The registered office is: One Castle Park, Tower Hill, Bristol BS2 0JA. T 0203 697 5800.

6 9

gnome on 7.2/ARM
by Jacco Ligthart 03 Apr '16

03 Apr '16

Hi List, just to let you know, I have a workaround for running gnome on 7.2 on ARM hardware. There is some issue with mesa/llvm which causes openGL programs to crash, including gnome shell. As a workaround I made a more recent mesa-private-llvm package and recompiled mesa to link to this newer version. Source rpms for this can be found here: http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/ftp.redsleeve.org/pub/el7-devel/el7/7.2/… Jacco PS, as we expect to shuffle our packages around a bit, the link might not be long lived :)

1 0

Announcement: CentOS 7 intermediate update to 1603 for AArch64
by Jim Perrin 30 Mar '16

30 Mar '16

This morning we released an intermediate update for AArch64/ARM64 which contains a number of fixes and improvements: Improvements ============ 1. Improved support for APM based hardware, to include network installation support for X-Gene 2 / Merlin Boards. 2. Initial support for NXP's LS2080 SoC. 3. Packaging fixes for noarch rpms, which resolves a few build system issues. 4. The cloud-init, and cloud-utils packages are now provided in the Extras repository. Upgrading ========= Simply 'yum update' as normal. A reboot will be required to take advantage of the new kernel. Downloads ========= Everything ISO: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/aarch64/CentOS-7-aarch64-Everything… sha256sum: c0a7c36af909197f35f6446d8317ae52b92c746aa5943bb11cd07fb8585b96a0 NetInstall ISO: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/aarch64/CentOS-7-aarch64-NetInstall… sha256sum: 6e71a7714100695e2d0714e01c804efc363935871c502a5793cd565ebc288aef Disk Image: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/isos/aarch64/CentOS-aarch64.img.xz sha256sum: 57f5d50a58b9f4f4757858c72704e81a990e64445d3ec492e5fa50aa77181d80 Known Issues ============ 1. The centos-release package has been updated. If you are using a custom yum repository rather than the defaults, please ensure that you update your configuration with the additional gpg key information included in the new package. 2. In nearly all cases the noarch packaging change is transparent, however if you experience a conflict between two noarch packages, this can be resolved by running the 'yum distro-sync'. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

2 3

Spec for ARM side libraries
by Hugo De Zela 26 Mar '16

26 Mar '16

Hi, I haven't seen anything regarding this so here's the one I use for my systems in case it helps anyone else. It simply compiles and installs the side libraries and executables and optionally symlinks them to /usr/bin. Please go ahead and clean it up if necessary, I'm by no means a packaging expert. -H

2 1

Broken kernel RPM
by Hugo De Zela 26 Mar '16

26 Mar '16

Hi, the kernel at http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/kernel/armhfp/kernel-rpi2/Packages/raspb… is broken, looks to be a compression error. Have looked around and found nothing regarding this. -H

2 2

CRDA warning message - solved
by Jan Kovalsky 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Hi all, if you are seeing after boot of RPi3 a lot of messages *cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain* followed then by a message *cfg80211: Exceeded CRDA call max attempts. Not calling CRDA* you might want to get rid of this warning message (as I wanted). All you have to do is to install crda package (and dependencies like iw) which provides a database of frequency bands to be used for WiFi transmissions in certain countries/regions. So just "yum install crda" and then "reboot". You should not see warnings anymore. Maybe this will help somebody. Jan

1 0

CUPS package for Pi 3 running CentOS 7
by Jan Kovalsky 22 Mar '16

22 Mar '16

Hi all developers, I'm currently considering to use Raspberry Pi 3 as a print server running CentOS 7. However I found that there is not cups rpm package available in any repo. I saw only client, filters and libs. Don't you know when cups rpm package might be available? Thanks for your answers. Jan

3 7

Re: [Arm-dev] AltArch Kernel Sources
by Gordan Bobic 20 Mar '16

20 Mar '16

On 19/03/16 12:51, Jim Perrin wrote: > > > On 03/19/2016 04:12 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote: >> Bump. It seems the kernel binary rpm doesn't match the availability of >> the sources for it. I can find no src.rpm matching the binary, and the >> CentOS git doesn't seem to include this version: >> https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!kernel-aarch64 >> > > You're looking in the wrong place. That's the git tree for the redhat > provided rhel(sa) sources. We don't modify that tree. > > You want the sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch from > https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!kernel.git Ah... My bad. In that repository, README.md says to look for the c7 branch - and there appears to be no c7 branch. Is the "sig-altarch7-aarch64" branch the correct one to use going forward? >> Can you please provide the full src.rpm used to build the >> kernel-4.2.0-0.26.el7.1.aarch64 package? > > http://people.centos.org/jperrin/srpms/kernel-aarch64-4.2.0-0.26.el7.1.src.… Thanks, most appreciated. > I might also recommend a new thread rather than just a subject change > for discussions like this. This message was very nearly lost to me as > I've stopped watching the gigabyte board thread. Apologies, fixed now. Gordan

2 3

aarch64 and @buildsys-build
by Gordan Bobic 20 Mar '16

20 Mar '16

It would appear that above group isn't defined, but it is what mock uses to build a minimal development chroot. Is the omission of this group deliberate or accidental? I can add it trivially enough through a dummy repository containing nothing but a group definition, but I'm curious as to whether there is a good reason for this not being there in the first place. Gordan

3 4

NXP Layerscape SoC Patch
by Lijun Pan 18 Mar '16

18 Mar '16

Hi Jim, Attached please find the initial support patch for NXP Layerscape LS2080 SoC. This patch is based on 4.2 kernel and top of origin/sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch of git://git.centos.org/sig-altarch/kernel.git repo. This patch provides NXP (Freescale) Layerscape SoC support for the following drivers: QORIQ-CLOCK POWER RESET SATA USB I2C eSDHC/eMMC Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Lijun

2 1

← Newer
1
...
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
...
69
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Arm-dev