Arm-dev

arm-dev@lists.centos.org

686 discussions

Hikey test emmc image availability
by Jim Perrin 10 Nov '15

10 Nov '15

I've posted a first build of CentOS for the Hikey from 96boards, and a ReadMe with the steps required to get the board going. http://people.centos.org/jperrin/hikey/ The ReadMe assumes that you've at least skimmed the 'Getting Started' section of the Hikey documentation, but walks through the fastboot commands to load the image. What I consider the 'blocker' to releasing this image presently is the lack of console output on HDMI. If someone's able to make that go, I will happily mail them some CentOS swag and put their name in the release notes for the image. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

2 3

how many people have hikeys for testing?
by Jim Perrin 03 Nov '15

03 Nov '15

I've got a basic image going for the hikey, but it's laid out a bit more android-filesystem style presently. There are a few things that need to be sorted out in the image, and I'd like to get some additional community involvement. How many folks on the list would be willing/able to help with testing/fixing the image if I posted it on git somewhere? -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77

7 7

centos aarch64 linux 3.19 kernel git repository?
by Arora Sakar 03 Nov '15

03 Nov '15

Hi I can only find rpm packages for centos aarch64 linux kernel. Isn't there a git repository, with complete source? The only one I found (https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=rpms/kernel-aarch64.git) has just configs. Thanks Sakar

2 1

ARMv8 virtualization support packages
by Lomovtsev, Vadim 21 Oct '15

21 Oct '15

Hi guys, As far as I know currently the virtualization support is stripped off the aarch64 build... Are there any info about virtualization support packages to be included into CentOS 7 aarch64 platform? Or may be there are some plans/roadmap where it will be available at CentOS? Just out of curiosity - anybody interested in virtialization support at CentOS fro aarch64 ? Vadim

2 2

backport request to fix a glibc bug in CentOS 7 aarch64
by Stefano Stabellini 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

Hi all, glibc in CentOS 7 aarch64 has a bug: see https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro-aarch64/+bug/1169164. Including signal.h causes the following symbols to be defined (they are actually in ptrace.h but signal.h includes it): #define PSR_MODE_EL0t 0x00000000 #define PSR_MODE_EL1t 0x00000004 #define PSR_MODE_EL1h 0x00000005 #define PSR_MODE_EL2t 0x00000008 #define PSR_MODE_EL2h 0x00000009 #define PSR_MODE_EL3t 0x0000000c #define PSR_MODE_EL3h 0x0000000d #define PSR_MODE_MASK 0x0000000f The presence of these symbols causes build failures of some Xen userspace applications, because they clash with the same symbols there. signal.h is POSIX so is restricted in what namespace is permitted to claim. Glibc has been fixed a while back: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-05/msg00327.html. The commit is the following: commit 7d05a8168b45c0580e1f9a79c2dd26c8f0d31fca Author: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux(a)linaro.org> Date: Tue May 20 13:45:22 2014 +0100 AArch64: Remove asm/ptrace.h inclusion in sys/user.h and sys/procfs.h It fixes the problem by removing the inclusion of ptrace.h from two other headers. The change allows Xen and any other applications which define PSR_MODE_ symbols to build appropriately. Nothing else should be affected. Any chances we can have that patch in the CentOS 7 aarch64 glibc? Thanks, Stefano

2 8

Cubieboard2 - selinux enforcing fails
by Robert Moskowitz 17 Oct '15

17 Oct '15

I had to rebuild me image from scratch, so this time, instead of permissive, I decided to set enforcing for selinux. I powered off and powered back on. What ever happened (and I can send the serial console to anyone wanting to review this), the system rebooted and came back around finally to login. Once I logged in, I saw that the ethernet was not available. So I am going to redo this and just leave selinux to disabled until we get further along (and someone else tests it out!). I am running all my systems behind two firewalls and will just have to rely on that for now.

5 7

Roseapple Pi Giveaway Event
by T.J. Yang 14 Oct '15

14 Oct '15

Hi All My first post here in this group. There is a giveaway event happening on Roseapp Pi F.B. page <https://www.facebook.com/roseapplepi?fref=ts>. You can fill the google form <http://goo.gl/forms/804Bo9e854> to apply for one. I got mine already, hope you get yours too ;) [rapi@f21rapi02 owl]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep ^Hardware Hardware : gs705a [rapi@f21rapi02 owl]$ [rapi@f21rapi02 owl]$ cat /etc/os-release NAME=Fedora VERSION="21 (Twenty One)" ID=fedora VERSION_ID=21 PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 21 (Twenty One)" ANSI_COLOR="0;34" CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:21" HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/" REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora" REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=21 REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=21 [rapi@f21rapi02 owl]$ -- T.J. Yang

1 0

Building failing C7 ARM packages (atlas)
by PixelDrift.NET Sam 09 Oct '15

09 Oct '15

Hi, I have recently been working through some of the failed CentOS 7 ARM RPM builds (http://armv7.dev.centos.org/report.html) with the following successful builds: atlas (F21) http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=260230 suitesparse (C7) gegl (C7) scipy (C7) gimp (C7) gsl (C7) bogofilter (C7) evolution (C7) evolution-ews (C7) evolution-mapi (C7) gutenprint (C7) brasero (C7 Modified BuildRequires brasero-devel) rhythmbox (C7) With atlas there appears to be a patch in the Fedora stream for the same version which fixes the armv7 build issue which appears to be blocking this package in the automated build process: * Sun Feb 16 2014 Marcin Juszkiewicz <mjuszkiewicz(a)redhat.com> - 3.10.1-11 - Unbreak AArch64 build. - ARMv8 is different from ARMv7 so should not be treated as such. Otherwise atlas tries to do some crazy ARMv764 build and fail. After building atlas with the fixed package I was able to proceed building the other listed packages with their original C7 srpms. Can someone advise on the process for getting the patch from the Fedora package into C7? Thanks in advance. -Sam

3 4

current build status
by Fabian Arrotin 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Just to let you know that I've spent (some) time today on some remaining packages, and some new packages built fine. If someone else also want to have a look at why the remaining packages don't build (probably need patches now), feel free to contribute ;-) Depending on how it goes, we can eventually decide to go to pass-2 (massive rebuild) against pass-1 only and then evaluate again. Then decide the current status (and updates to be built) , push "official" images for public consumption for various boards (and automate all that), and release the tree to mirrors (after having signed the whole tree) Happy week-end - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlYFkv0ACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6PTQCeKA8uoMJoovixxtgMfV/8PbrN YRcAniUiRefyMqiU++NPkJG9mkUBdKVa =WVKq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 5

Submitting a roll-up patch to support 2nd SGMII and XFI ports for APM X-Gene
by Y Vo 02 Oct '15

02 Oct '15

Hi all, I am Y Vo from AppliedMicro. Per APM’s recent discussion with Jim Perrin, we’ll be sending a patch which rolls up several commits already accepted into upstream kernel in order to support the 2nd SGMII and XFI interfaces for X-Gene. This is applicable for the current CentOS 7.1 release based on kernel 3.19. Regards, Y

2 2

← Newer
1
...
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
...
69
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

Arm-dev