On 19/03/16 13:43, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 03/19/2016 08:02 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On 19/03/16 12:51, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 03/19/2016 04:12 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
Bump. It seems the kernel binary rpm doesn't match the availability of the sources for it. I can find no src.rpm matching the binary, and the CentOS git doesn't seem to include this version: https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!kernel-aarch64
You're looking in the wrong place. That's the git tree for the redhat provided rhel(sa) sources. We don't modify that tree.
You want the sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch from https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!kernel.git
Ah... My bad. In that repository, README.md says to look for the c7 branch - and there appears to be no c7 branch. Is the "sig-altarch7-aarch64" branch the correct one to use going forward?
In most cases, yes. I take the default rhelsa sources and periodically roll patches submitted to the list (and CVE fixes as needed) into that branch. I need to write up the 'patches accepted' guidelines on the wiki, to formalize that process a bit.
Speaking of CVEs, is a rebase to a more up to date LT kernel on the cards for the near future?