Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/31/2015 06:05 AM, Carl T. Miller wrote:
Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Can you confirm that it's indeed the rpi1 model ? If so you know now why it doesn't work.
Yes, it is an rpi1. Are there plans to ever port CentOS Userland to to armv6hl? Also, would you consider updating the wiki page to make it more clear about which models are supported? That would save some frustration for people like me who find the page when searching for "centos on rpi".
The Redsleeve project has armv5 support. Pretty decent group of people.
But the approach taken here precludes the armv5 (and v6) architecture. Lots of reasons why, it seems, but this issue was beaten up a lot over on the Fedora-arm list years ago and Centos7-arm inherits the Fedora-arm work, just like Centos7-x86_64 does the Fedora-x86_64...
Yes, this makes sense now that I know a bit of the history. For now I'll go back to Redsleeve until if/when I get an rpi2. Thanks for the info.
c