Happy New Year, Jim.
I am following up on this submission whether it has been done.
Also, when do we have a full 4.2 release with installer and rootfs?
Thanks,
-Phong
-----Original Message----- From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 9:09 PM To: arm-dev@centos.org Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches
Got it, thanks.
On 12/09/2015 01:01 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
Please find the attached APM patches for 4.2 based kernel.
Thanks,
-Phong
-----Original Message----- From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:55 AM To: arm-dev@centos.org Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches
I've just pushed pushed the update to the sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch. You can find the new 4.2 based kernel at https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!kernel.git
If you could supply any needed patches for that kernel I'll run through the build.
On 12/02/2015 08:00 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
We need to enable newly added configuration, and the only way I could think of is to do it as part of kernel-aarch64.spec utilizing the existing configuration merge mechanism, and without impacting the config-xxx files received from Redhat.
Yes, 4.2 patches are ready. I'll submit as soon as you are ready. However, we still need to resolve the config issue then.
-Phong
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org wrote:
I've been reasonably head-down on getting the new sources built.
I guess my concern here is the need to merge your config changes in
each
iteration. Is there a particular reason for doing it that way? Are you trying to ensure ordering here?
Also, we'll have the updated builds ready to go in the next few days.
I
can run with this for the 3.19 update for now, however we'd need the
4.2
patches reasonably soon. Would that be a problem?
On 12/02/2015 03:44 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
Do you have any feedback?
-Phong
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Phong Vo pvo@apm.com wrote:
Hi Jim,
I am resending the config patch. The change is to use merge.pl to merge config-centos-sig into the final config in
SPECS/kernel-aarch64
instead of modifying Makefile.config.
The patch is against branch 3.19 of
git://git.centos.org/sig-altarch/kernel.git
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
-Phong
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org
wrote:
On 11/23/2015 09:42 AM, Phong Vo wrote: > Hi Jim, > > > > The config patch works fine for me. It would be creating a > SOURCES/config-centos-sig and also modifying
SOURCES/Makefile.config.
> Actually, the patch is against the 3.19 version of c7-aarch64, not
the
> sig-altarch/kernel 3.19 branch version; but I believe both should
be
> the same. >
Right. It's this modification of the Makefile.config I'm trying to avoid. The way the configs are combined in the spec file mean that
we
don't need to modify it. It's a semantic difference in how the
packaging
is done, where I'm trying to reduce or eliminate the need to modify/touch files provided by rh or in the kernel tarball.
-- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
-- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev