On 27/02/17 20:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/27/2017 11:21 AM, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
Where can I get the proper srpms that contains php-imp?
Like Fabian said, it's in php-extras, part of epel: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/SRPMS/p/php-extras-5.4.16-7.el7.src.r...
Where can if find complete instructions on building from said srpms?
I would use mock, in stead of rpmbuild. mock will create a build environment, so that builds are repeatable.
man page: https://linux.die.net/man/1/mock
a fairly long overview: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package
Now I have to fight with dependencies for fedora-packager and fedora-review.
This is going nowhere fast.
Does anyone have an environment set up where php-extras can be built and see what is wrong with building php-imap?
thanks
Mulltiple things : - mock (that we use for the armhfp builds) is available in the extras repository - mixing with epel is *your* choice but as epel on armhfp is a "nobody has a look at this" effort, we all have to keep the pieces if we blindly try to use it
Wrt that php-extras, have you tried to have a look at the build logs ? have you tried to contact for example the upstream maintainer about that issue ?
That's what I did (after I received your personal mail to my inbox, please don't do that again), and Remi Collet (from the --changelog) is a nice guy who had a quick look at the potential issue, specifically for another mcrypt bug he was working on (at the same time)
So here is what I just got from our armhfp builders :
17667 (php-extras): Build on target epel-pass-1 succeeded. Build logs may be found at http://armv7.dev.centos.org/rpmbuild/epel-pass-1/17667-php-extras-5.4.16-8.e...
That means that pkg is now available, but again, no test, no repoclosure test, etc ...
Enjoy, and contribute back :-)