Thanks, Jim!
I am attaching an additional patch to fix an issue due to a previous change causing Mellanox driver not to come up. Please see if you can accommodate it in this round of kernel update.
-Phong
-----Original Message----- From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:05 PM To: arm-dev@centos.org Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches
I hit a snag with the installer segfaulting on specific hardware. I've since resolved that and have pushed an iso for Johnny to test as well. If that works, I'll be syncing the trees and pushing this week.
Your patches will be rolled into an update kernel that will also be available at the same time. This way the install media matches what people expect, and the updates are available to enable the additional features.
On 01/04/2016 07:57 PM, Phong Vo wrote:
Happy New Year, Jim.
I am following up on this submission whether it has been done.
Also, when do we have a full 4.2 release with installer and rootfs?
Thanks,
-Phong
-----Original Message----- From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 9:09 PM To: arm-dev@centos.org Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches
Got it, thanks.
On 12/09/2015 01:01 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
Please find the attached APM patches for 4.2 based kernel.
Thanks,
-Phong
-----Original Message----- From: arm-dev-bounces@centos.org [mailto:arm-dev-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jim Perrin Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 3:55 AM To: arm-dev@centos.org Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] Next set of APM X-Gene patches
I've just pushed pushed the update to the sig-altarch7-aarch64 branch. You can find the new 4.2 based kernel at https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!kernel.git
If you could supply any needed patches for that kernel I'll run through the build.
On 12/02/2015 08:00 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
We need to enable newly added configuration, and the only way I could think of is to do it as part of kernel-aarch64.spec utilizing the existing configuration merge mechanism, and without impacting the config-xxx files received from Redhat.
Yes, 4.2 patches are ready. I'll submit as soon as you are ready. However, we still need to resolve the config issue then.
-Phong
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org wrote:
I've been reasonably head-down on getting the new sources built.
I guess my concern here is the need to merge your config changes in
each
iteration. Is there a particular reason for doing it that way? Are
you
trying to ensure ordering here?
Also, we'll have the updated builds ready to go in the next few days.
I
can run with this for the 3.19 update for now, however we'd need the
4.2
patches reasonably soon. Would that be a problem?
On 12/02/2015 03:44 AM, Phong Vo wrote:
Hi Jim,
Do you have any feedback?
-Phong
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Phong Vo pvo@apm.com wrote:
Hi Jim,
I am resending the config patch. The change is to use merge.pl to merge config-centos-sig into the final config in
SPECS/kernel-aarch64
instead of modifying Makefile.config.
The patch is against branch 3.19 of
git://git.centos.org/sig-altarch/kernel.git
Let me know what you think.
Thanks,
-Phong
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Jim Perrin jperrin@centos.org
wrote:
> > > On 11/23/2015 09:42 AM, Phong Vo wrote: >> Hi Jim, >> >> >> >> The config patch works fine for me. It would be creating a >> SOURCES/config-centos-sig and also modifying
SOURCES/Makefile.config.
>> Actually, the patch is against the 3.19 version of c7-aarch64,
not
the
>> sig-altarch/kernel 3.19 branch version; but I believe both should
be
>> the same. >> > > > Right. It's this modification of the Makefile.config I'm trying to > avoid. The way the configs are combined in the spec file mean that
we
> don't need to modify it. It's a semantic difference in how the
packaging
> is done, where I'm trying to reduce or eliminate the need to > modify/touch files provided by rh or in the kernel tarball. > > -- > Jim Perrin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
-- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev