I don't know. These are the kernels RH has chosen for their arm64 platform, I'm matching their decisions and adding enhancements as I can.
On 09/06/2017 09:45 AM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
If I may be so bold to ask, why the seeming preference for non-LT kernels over LT kernels? Why 4.5 rather than 4.4? Why not 4.9? Why 4.11 rather than the already available 4.13 which I believe is the next LT release? It seems like a lot of necessity for extra work for no benefit and potentially considerable detriment.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin@centos.org mailto:jperrin@centos.org> wrote:
I've just pushed the 4.11 kernel rebase into git ( https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=sig-altarch/kernel <https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=sig-altarch/kernel> ) The previous patches included in the 4.5 kernel have been dropped as the majority either are now included or no longer apply cleanly. Please take a look at configs listed and submit patches for things you'd like to see enabled. This 4.11 base will be coming out shortly as part of the 7.4.1708 build. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77 _______________________________________________ Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org <mailto:Arm-dev@centos.org> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev <https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev>
Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev