On 12/11/16 16:39, Jacco Ligthart wrote:
Hi Fabian,
I don't have the time to go through the whole list, but I think I have some pointers:
general: I saw quite a couple of packages that only build against 7.3 rpms, but also a fair number needed specific packages from 7.2. mostly glib2, xorg-x11-server-source, tzdata IIRC
- ruby I see the same thing on armv5 AND x86_64. unsure what the issue is.
I had a look at the x86_64 mock config file and it seems that we need specific version of glibc and openssl to be able to build : testing that on my side now (ref: http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.1611.01/ruby/20161115141643/2.0.0.648-29.el7....)
I hope the regular CentOS build sees the same and finds a fix
- java 1.6 and 1.7 ARM32JIT is broken, see
Yes, 1.8 builds fine though (and we never shipped 1.6 nor 1.7 so expected to fail too)
- libcmis build without tests.
Interesting, wondering if there is a way to fix the test and see if the fail is a real failing test or something else
- python-cryptography misses dependencies that are not in the tree. Do you know where the
git repo is for the extras tree?
Yes, in extras and those were built/pushed to buildlogs too : - http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-extras/python-cryptography-vectors/2016111513... - http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-extras/python-hypothesis/20161115132101/pytho...
- mesa add /usr/lib/dri/msm_dri.so to the %files
Yes, and I fixed too : http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c71611-pass-1/mesa/11.2.2-2.20160614.el7...
- mvapic2, dapl, mpitests, mstflint and perftest those I never got to work on armv5
Same on armhfp and I don't know if people are using those either
- glibc as discussed earlier
Yes, and I applied your patch , and that's how from that point I rebuilt all the other ones against that glibc built pkg : http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c71611-pass-1/glibc/2.17-157.el7.centos/
Cheers,