On 10 March 2016 at 14:01, Fabian Arrotin arrfab@centos.org wrote:
On 10/03/16 21:13, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Hi my name is Stephen Smoogen, and I am joining the CentOS ARM group to help on getting EPEL packages ported to this version of the OS.
I have worked in CentOS back in the EL-5 days doing some QA and other work as needed. I am currently working in Fedora Project in the infrastructure group with a primary interest in EPEL.
I will be ordering a RaspPi 2 (or 3 if that is what I get) to do the testing on. I will also be working on any build issues that I can.
Hi Smooge,
Nice to see you on the list ;-) One thing that would be good to know is if having "upstream" epel build (so at the Fedora builders level) for AltArch (like armhfp/aarch64) is still an option, and if so when would that be possible. In the meantime, we can try to rebuild/bootstrap something on our side (and I started that last week for pkgs having a high demand) and report that at the Epel level too. More than happy to give you plague-client access to the plague build farm for that centralized build effort
OK at this point I don't think we will be able to get i386 or arm32 into the main EPEL builders due to Fedora 24 readiness issues needing more effort in koji than secondary split-brain architectures. So instead I would like to look at a branch of centos via plague builders and using a snapshot status versus live update status. We can work out how they are to be mirrored etc from there.
-- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
Arm-dev mailing list Arm-dev@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev