- automotive-sig - lists.centos.org

Demo repo creation: soafee-virtual-platform-blueprint
by Leonardo Rossetti 21 Jul '25

21 Jul '25

Hello, I would like to request a new demo repository in https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/demos, named "soafee-virtual-platform-blueprint". This repository will host demo files to run our SOAFEE virtual platform blueprint (AutoSD Frankenbuild for now). Regards, -- Leonardo Rossetti Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> lrossett(a)redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com>

2 2

Demo Repository Request: Autoware
by Leonardo Rossetti 21 Jul '25

21 Jul '25

Hello, I would like to request a new demo repository: "autoware" here: https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/demos. The repository would host Autoware (Open Ad-Kit for now) quadlet manifest files and aib files to deploy/run their ADAS software in an AutoSD image. Regards, -- Leonardo Rossetti Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> lrossett(a)redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com>

2 1

Forex VPS Hosting
by Net2secure Pvt Ltd 04 Jul '25

04 Jul '25

Forex VPS Hosting is a specialized Virtual Private Server service designed for Forex traders. It allows them to run trading platforms like MetaTrader 4/5 24/7 without interruption. Here’s a short overview: Purpose: Ensures constant, low-latency connection to brokers, even if your personal device is off or loses internet access. Benefits: Minimizes slippage and latency Improves execution speed Provides reliability for automated trading (e.g., using Expert Advisors) Features: 24/7 uptime High-speed internet Secure and isolated environment Common Users: Automated traders, scalpers, and those needing consistent connectivity to the trading server. https://www.net2secure.com/forex-vps-hosting

1 0

Repository request
by mengel＠redhat.com 27 Jun '25

27 Jun '25

Hi everyone, I would like to request a new repository creation: https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/demos/ai-on-autosd This repository will host demos and POCs on how AI can be used on AutoSD. I intend to move the contents of https://gitlab.com/mengel1/ai-on-autosd/ as a first demo/poc there as well. Regards, Michael Engel Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat https://www.redhat.com mengel(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com

2 1

util-linux-automotive and dracut-automotive development repository request
by Ian Mullins 17 Jun '25

17 Jun '25

Hello, I'm requesting the creation of two new repositories in the src namespace as seen below: - https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/src/util-linux-automotive - https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/src/dracut-automotive Both the util-linux-automotive and dracut-automotive projects currently reside in https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/rpms/ , which serves both as development and dist-git repo. The new repositories are required to migrate the development of both projects, leaving the original project repositories as dist-git only. Thank you in advance, Ian

1 0

Repository request for acrn-hypervisor
by Erico Nunes 27 May '25

27 May '25

I would like to request a new repository to transfer https://gitlab.com/ernunes/acrn-hypervisor-spec to the automotive-sig. It is a .spec file repository for the ACRN hypervisor which can be used with AutoSD. Please note that the package cannot be built as-is, due to how that project works it requires a platform-specific configuration to be added by the user before building the actual RPMs. So I think the appropriate path for now would be src/acrn-hypervisor. This will be referenced in the automotive-sig docs as a followup.

2 1

Re: Copr builds to allow AutoSD and Automotive SIG packages installation on Fedora
by Martin Perina 27 May '25

27 May '25

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 11:28 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 10:29:39AM +0200, Martin Perina via automotive-sig > wrote: > > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 3:08 PM Mark Kemel via automotive-sig > > <[1]automotive-sig(a)lists.centos.org> wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > Currently we have two packages, for which we have dedicated COPR > repos > > for release versions: > > [2] > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/automotive-… > > and > > [3] > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/osbuild-aut… > . > > These are automatically built with Packit, triggered by GitLab > releases, > > allowing users to run a-i-b on Fedora. > > Following the Slack discussion on auto-boot-check COPR builds, I > want to > > address this here. For packages like auto-boot-check, which are > built > > solely for the AutoSD/Automotive SIG and not intended for Fedora > release > > but should be installable from COPR, we need to decide on the > repository > > structure. Should we create a separate COPR repo for each package > under > > the '@centos-automotive-sig' project, similar to a-i-b and > osbuild-auto, > > or should we group these packages into repos by usage? For instance, > > should auto-boot-check release builds be done within the > > automotive-image-builder repo? > > I'd think it depends how tied together the packages are and if they are > released > together or at different rhythms. > I can see pros and cons to both approaches > > > I think it would be beneficial to have an official repository for > Fedora, > > which will contain releases of the same packages as we have in AutoSD. > > So you're thinking 1 COPR repo for fedora builds of all the AutoSD > packages? > Yeah, that seems to me much easier than having a separate copr repo per package > > Pierre > > -- Martin Perina Manager, Software Engineering Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

1 0

Copr builds to allow AutoSD and Automotive SIG packages installation on Fedora
by Mark Kemel 27 May '25

27 May '25

Hello all, Currently we have two packages, for which we have dedicated COPR repos for release versions: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/automotive-… <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/cent…> and https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/centos-automotive-sig/osbuild-aut… <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/cent…>. These are automatically built with Packit, triggered by GitLab releases, allowing users to run a-i-b on Fedora. Following the Slack discussion on auto-boot-check COPR builds, I want to address this here. For packages like auto-boot-check, which are built solely for the AutoSD/Automotive SIG and not intended for Fedora release but should be installable from COPR, we need to decide on the repository structure. Should we create a separate COPR repo for each package under the '@centos-automotive-sig' project, similar to a-i-b and osbuild-auto, or should we group these packages into repos by usage? For instance, should auto-boot-check release builds be done within the automotive-image-builder repo? Looking forward to your thoughts on this. Best regards, Mark -- Mark Kemel Senior Software Engineer, RHIVOS Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com> mkemel(a)redhat.com <https://www.redhat.com>

2 1

[NOTICE] autosd.sig.centos.org planned maintenance and upgrades May 13th 2025
by Hubert Stefański 13 May '25

13 May '25

Dear Users, Please be advised that the *autosd.sig.centos.org <http://autosd.sig.centos.org>* web server will undergo maintenance tomorrow *May 13th * starting at *10:00 CEST.*We expect the downtime to last approximately one hour. *Other Popular Timezones:Pacific Daylight Time (PDT):* 01:00 AM *Eastern Daylight Time (EDT):* 04:00 AM *British Summer Time (BST):* 09:00 AM *India Standard Time (IST):* 1:30 PM *China Standard Time (CST):* 4:00 PM *Japan Standard Time (JST):* 5:00 PM *Australian Eastern Standard Time (AEST):* 6:00 PM We'll attempt to upgrade the instance and switch over to AWS CloudFront ahead of Red Hat Summit, The previous upgrade was rolled back as users started reporting issues, however based on our testing earlier today we believe most of these have been resolved. Please report any issues by replying to this thread, or to emailing me directly (hstefans(a)redhat.com) Thanks! Hubert stefański Senior Software Engineer Red Hat In-Vehicle OS Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> Remote Poland [image: Red Hat In-Vehicle Operating System logo]

1 3

Request new git repo
by Alexander Larsson 07 May '25

07 May '25

I would like a new repo rpms/gnu-efi-ukiboot. We need this to build a newer gnu-efi for ukiboot, because the one in cs9 doesn't work on aarch64. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc alexl(a)redhat.com alexander.larsson(a)gmail.com

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

automotive-sig