- automotive-sig - lists.centos.org

Repository request for qcom-abl and qtestsign
by Eric Chanudet 09 Jun '26

09 Jun '26

Hi, I would like to request the following dist-git to be created: - qcom-abl: to package Qualcomm's Ride4 ABL[1], - qtestsign: to package a test signing tool for Qualcomm's ELF binaries[2]. This is intended to facilitate ABL handling during flash/upgrade in tests/demo environments. Best, [1]https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/le/abl/tianocore/edk2/-/tree/uefi.lnx.4.0.… [2]https://github.com/msm8916-mainline/qtestsign -- Eric Chanudet

2 1

Re: Repository request for oci-delta package
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 29 May '26

29 May '26

Resending from the right email... (take #2) On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 05:11:37PM +0200, Martin Perina via automotive-sig wrote: > Hi, > may I ask for repository > under [1]https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/rpms to be able to build > oci-delta package for Automotive SIG distribution? > oci-delta package is developed > in [2]https://github.com/containers/oci-delta so the requested repo > will be used just to build RPM packages. https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/rpms/oci-delta has been created :) Happy packaging ! Pierre

2 1

Repository request for oci-delta package
by Martin Perina 29 May '26

29 May '26

Hi, may I ask for repository under https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/rpms to be able to build oci-delta package for Automotive SIG distribution? oci-delta package is developed in https://github.com/containers/oci-delta so the requested repo will be used just to build RPM packages. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Perina Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat In-Vehicle Operating System Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Re: CentOS Automotive SIG moving to chat
by Jeffrey Osier-Mixon 27 May '26

27 May '26

While I agree, I would also say that "tangibly" is open to interpretation. "used normally" in this case really means "can it be built into a reasonable SDV architecture", which is mostly in the domain of automotive manufacturers and suppliers rather than individual enthusiasts. AutoSD's prevalence in SOAFEE and Eclipse SDV is definitely tangible in community terms, but you cant really put your hands on it or make smoke come out. For the latter, a larger community effort would be necessary. That said, if someone in the community wants to use it for something fun, I'd be glad to help hunt for resources to support such an effort. Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon | josiermi(a)redhat.com Distinguished Community Architect Automotive, Edge, & Hardware Enablement Communities Red Hat Open Source & AI Program Office Book a meeting: https://calendar.app.google/sMBa7Xe8CLSEUdGV9 On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 11:07 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:30 AM Jeffrey Osier-Mixon <jefro(a)redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > Of course. In addition to AutoSD being used in several other open source > communities (Eclipse SDV, SOAFEE, Autoware) it is of strong interest to > other transportation entities - think trains, farming equipment - as well > as robotics applications. To my knowledge no one has deployed it on an RC > car but there is no reason not to. We had some discussions internally a few > years ago about f1tenth. It would have to be a community effort, though. > > > > As long as there's nothing people can tangibly use it with, it's going > to be hard to attract and retain enthusiast contributors. Do you have > anything you can show off so people can actively work with it in a > meaningfully similar way to how it would be used normally? > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > >

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Re: CentOS Automotive SIG moving to chat
by Jeffrey Osier-Mixon 26 May '26

26 May '26

Of course. In addition to AutoSD being used in several other open source communities (Eclipse SDV, SOAFEE, Autoware) it is of strong interest to other transportation entities - think trains, farming equipment - as well as robotics applications. To my knowledge no one has deployed it on an RC car but there is no reason not to. We had some discussions internally a few years ago about f1tenth. It would have to be a community effort, though. Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon | josiermi(a)redhat.com Distinguished Community Architect Automotive, Edge, & Hardware Enablement Communities Red Hat Open Source & AI Program Office Book a meeting: https://calendar.app.google/sMBa7Xe8CLSEUdGV9 On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:20 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 9:46 AM Jeffrey Osier-Mixon <jefro(a)redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > Sounds good, thanks, we can definitely use a meeting room. > > > > I would call this less a regression and more a response to the > community's expressed preference. Meeting attendance has declined > significantly - we aren't having those discussions in the automotive SIG, > which we started before things like Eclipse SDV existed. I would love to > reel them back in. One reason we wanted to move this meeting to Matrix is > to encourage further communication, as many people have conflicts for a > physical meeting who would otherwise be able to attend one on chat. Also > willing to move the time around, but every time is bad for someone. > > > > In regard to the other questions about where people are talking and > where we should introduce AutoSD, let's cover that in next week's meeting :) > > > > Is there yet a way for people to do something with AutoSD that doesn't > involve being an automaker? Like affordable RC cars or something like > that? It's rather hard to hold a community together that can't do > anything... > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > >

1 0

Re: [CentOS-devel] Re: CentOS Automotive SIG moving to chat
by Jeffrey Osier-Mixon 26 May '26

26 May '26

Sounds good, thanks, we can definitely use a meeting room. I would call this less a regression and more a response to the community's expressed preference. Meeting attendance has declined significantly - we aren't having those discussions in the automotive SIG, which we started before things like Eclipse SDV existed. I would love to reel them back in. One reason we wanted to move this meeting to Matrix is to encourage further communication, as many people have conflicts for a physical meeting who would otherwise be able to attend one on chat. Also willing to move the time around, but every time is bad for someone. In regard to the other questions about where people are talking and where we should introduce AutoSD, let's cover that in next week's meeting :) Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon | josiermi(a)redhat.com Distinguished Community Architect Automotive, Edge, & Hardware Enablement Communities Red Hat Open Source & AI Program Office Book a meeting: https://calendar.app.google/sMBa7Xe8CLSEUdGV9 On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 9:31 AM Jeff Ligon via devel <devel(a)lists.centos.org> wrote: > > > > On May 26, 2026 at 9:22:52 AM, Neal Gompa (ngompa13(a)gmail.com) wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 9:16 AM Jeffrey Osier-Mixon via devel > <devel(a)lists.centos.org> wrote: > > > > Hi folks - we are moving the CentOS Automotive SIG meeting to Matrix > chat going forward. Currently it will be at the same time - first > Wednesdays of each month at 1400 UTC = 10:00am EDT, 16:00 CEST. The > difference is that instead of a call, the meeting will be held on our > Matrix channel at > > > > > https://app.element.io/?updated=1.11.3#/room/#centos-automotive-sig:fedorap… > > > > I'll change the meeting invite today. If you have any trouble reaching > the channel or need any help, please reach out to myself or Leo. > > > > Could you please use one of the meeting rooms instead? That way > there's the ability to leverage the meeting bot and logging in > meetbot.fedoraproject.org. > > I dislike this move as I see Matrix as an outdated communication platform > that just keeps the same people talking to the same people who are already > there. > > Where is the Automotive Open source community talking? where are the > people who don't know Linux that we want to introduce to AutoSD so that we > can make a bigger impact. > > Going to where we already are feels like a regression. Could be worse. > > But I'll see you there since i'm there anyways. As Neil says, > fedora-meeting-1 > > -Jeff > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.centos.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.centos.org > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.centos.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.centos.org >

1 0

CentOS Automotive SIG moving to chat
by Jeffrey Osier-Mixon 26 May '26

26 May '26

Hi folks - we are moving the CentOS Automotive SIG meeting to Matrix chat going forward. Currently it will be at the same time - first Wednesdays of each month at 1400 UTC = 10:00am EDT, 16:00 CEST. The difference is that instead of a call, the meeting will be held on our Matrix channel at https://app.element.io/?updated=1.11.3#/room/#centos-automotive-sig:fedorap… I'll change the meeting invite today. If you have any trouble reaching the channel or need any help, please reach out to myself or Leo. best, Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon | josiermi(a)redhat.com Distinguished Community Architect Automotive, Edge, & Hardware Enablement Communities Red Hat Open Source & AI Program Office Book a meeting: https://calendar.app.google/sMBa7Xe8CLSEUdGV9

1 0

Repository request for network ffi demo
by Yuki Wada 08 May '26

08 May '26

Hi team, I would like to put a new demo in https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/demos . Could you create an empty repo under the name of `network-ffi` ? Thank you in advance. Yuki Wada 和田悠基 Red Hat In-Vehicle OS Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://www.redhat.com/>

2 1

Repository request for kernel-ivos-nxp-extra-modules
by Enric Balletbo i Serra 06 May '26

06 May '26

Hi everyone, Following the enablement of the NXP board (S32G/S32N), we request the creation of new repositories for the NXP-specific kernel extra modules. These modules are essential for our hardware enablement within the Automotive SIG ecosystem. Please create the following repositories: Source Repository: https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/src/kernel-ivos-nxp-extra-modules These modules provide the necessary drivers and out-of-tree enhancements for NXP hardware compatibility within the IVOS (In-Vehicle Operating System) environment. Best regards, Enric

2 5

moving monthly meeting to Matrix
by Jeffrey Osier-Mixon 04 May '26

04 May '26

Hi all - Leo will be running this month's call on Weds, and one thing we were just discussing is moving the monthly meeting to Matrix, as office hours starting in June. This is in line with how some other SIGs operate in CentOS and Fedora, and we feel it would make the meeting more accessible. If you have any thoughts on this, positive or negative, please discuss on this thread. thanks Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon | josiermi(a)redhat.com Distinguished Community Architect Automotive, Edge, & Hardware Enablement Communities Red Hat Open Source & AI Program Office Book a meeting: https://calendar.app.google/sMBa7Xe8CLSEUdGV9

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

automotive-sig