Good Morning Everyone,
I would like to raise the topic of enforcing 2FA on the entire CentOS/Automotive
namespace on gitlab: https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/
This is something I can do, but before I click the button I'd like to ask: is
anyone opposed to this?
If not, I'll switch the configuration next week.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
Pierre
I am experiencing issues while building an AUTOSD image for TDA4 EVM Board. I have attached the detailed build procedure followed, along with the error logs observed during the build process of the TDA4 EVM board, for your reference. Please share the recommended procedure to create a bootable SD card using the AUTOSD image.
Website followed - https://docs.centos.org/automotive-sig-documentation/provisioning/flashing-…
OS - CentOS Stream 10 (On virtual machine manager)
Commands used -
[sk@localhost automotive-image-builder]$ sudo ./bin/aib-dev build-deprecated \ --container \ --target tda4vm_sk \ --mode package \ --export image \ examples/simple.aib.yml .
Output -
usage: aib-dev [-h] [--version] [--verbose]
{build-deprecated,build,list-distro,list-targets,list-rpms,download}
...
aib-dev: error: unrecognized arguments: tda4vm_sk --mode package --export image examples/simple.aib.yml .
Hi folks - we are paring down the number of inactive accounts who have
commit access to the SIG repos. If you haven't committed, sent email, or
otherwise interacted with the SIG in the past 3 months, we will be
decommissioning your permission. If you feel this is in error, please get
in touch and we can fix it.
thanks
Jeffrey "Jefro" Osier-Mixon | josiermi(a)redhat.com
Distinguished Community Architect
Automotive, Edge, & Hardware Enablement Communities
Red Hat Open Source & AI Program Office
Book a meeting: https://calendar.app.google/sMBa7Xe8CLSEUdGV9
Good Morning Everyone,
In the sig-docs [1] repository we have a CI job that runs daily and builds, runs
and checks a number of images [2].
When those builds/runs/checks fail there is usually a good reason that we should
go and check.
Currently I believe I'm the only one being notified about those failure.
As part of https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/sig-docs/-/merge_requests/441
I'd like this list to be notified, but I don't want to do this without asking
before.
So what do you all think? Is anyone against this?
If not, then I'll go ahead with the change and if it starts to be too
annoying/noisy we can always revisit later :)
Looking forward for your feedback :)
Pierre
@CentOS Automotive SIG <automotive-sig(a)lists.centos.org> may be interested
as well.
Il giorno mer 14 gen 2026 alle ore 21:18 Amy Marrich via devel <
devel(a)lists.centos.org> ha scritto:
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Amnon Ilan <ailan(a)redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 2:35 PM
> Subject: [PROPOSAL] Creating the NVIDIA Enablement SIG - Accelerating
> NVIDIA Upstream Integration
> To: <devel(a)lists.centos.org>
> Cc: Amy Marrich <amarrich(a)redhat.com>, Neo Jia <cjia(a)nvidia.com>, <
> newtonl(a)nvidia.com>
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to propose the creation of a new Special Interest Group: the NVIDIA
> Enablement SIG.
> Purpose
>
> The NVIDIA Enablement SIG will integrate these "in-flight" upstream
> patches from NVIDIA into a specialized variant of CentOS Stream, allowing
> the community to test and utilize next-generation hardware capabilities
> today.
> Scope
>
> The initial work of the SIG will focus on the foundational layers of the
> stack required for modern compute and graphics hardware:
>
> -
>
> Linux Kernel: Integrating and testing patches submitted by NVIDIA to
> the kernel community that improve hardware support and system integration.
> -
>
> Virtualization (QEMU & libvirt): Implementing upcoming changes that
> enhance how virtual machines interact with hardware accelerators and modern
> GPU architectures.
> -
>
> Continuous Alignment: Ensuring these patches maintain parallel
> compatibility with the core CentOS Stream codebase as they evolve during
> the upstream review process.
>
> Deliverables
>
> -
>
> SIG Repositories: builds of the kernel, qemu-kvm, and libvirt
> containing the latest upstream-bound patches.
> -
>
> Enablement Packages: A centos-release-nvidia-enablement package to
> provide users with an easy path to opt-in to these experimental stacks.
> -
>
> Future work:
> -
>
> Expanded package set as appropriate
> -
>
> Install media / images
>
> Initial Members
>
> -
>
> Amnon Ilan - (Proposed Chair)
> -
>
> Amy Marrich - (Board Sponsor)
> -
>
> Neo Gia
> -
>
> Newton Liu
> -
>
> [Member Name] (We invite anyone interested in the future of
> open-source hardware enablement to join us.)
>
> Resources Requested
>
> -
>
> Wiki: sigs.centos.org/nvidia-enablement
> -
>
> CBS Access: Build tags and targets for CentOS Stream 10.
>
> We look forward to hearing the community's thoughts on this proposal.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Amnon Ilan
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.centos.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.centos.org
>
--
Sandro Bonazzola
MANAGER, ENGINEERING
Red Hat In-Vehicle Operating System
Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://www.redhat.com/>
<https://redhat.com/options>
*Red Hat respects your work life balance. Therefore there is no need to
answer this email out of your office hours.*
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 07:14:47PM +0200, Shmuel Melamud via automotive-sig wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I need a new repository 'vm-connect' under
> https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/demos to place sample
> configurations to be used for inter-VM communication.
The project has been created:
https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/demos/vm-connect#
Sorry for the delay :]
Let me know if there is anything else I can help with!
Cheers,
Pierre
Hi Everyone,
I need a new repository 'vm-connect' under
https://gitlab.com/CentOS/automotive/demos to place sample
configurations to be used for inter-VM communication.
Can you please give me permissions for adding a repository or create
the repository for myself?
Shmuel