Discuss December 2007

discuss@lists.centos.org

279 participants
374 discussions

Can't build CentOS 5.1 kernel from source
by MHR 04 Dec '07

04 Dec '07

I pulled down the kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.src.rpm source to build my usual custom kernel (adds NTFS wwrite support) and it does not build. Whether I include the NTFS or just build from the source with no changes (other than make oldconfig and adding the # x86_64 line), I get this error every time: Building modules, stage 2. + mkdir -p /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/usr/lib/debug/boot + mkdir -p /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/usr/lib/debug/boot + mkdir -p /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/boot + install -m 644 .config /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/boot/config- 2.6.18-53.el5.nx + install -m 644 System.map /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root /boot/System.map-2.6.18-53.el5.nx + touch /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/boot/initrd- 2.6.18-53.el5.nx.img + cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-53.el5.nx + '[' -f arch/x86_64/boot/zImage.stub ']' + '[' '' == kdump ']' + mkdir -p /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/lib/modules/2.6.18- 53.el5.nx + make -s ARCH=x86_64 INSTALL_MOD_PATH=/var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-rootmodules_install KERNELRELEASE= 2.6.18-53.el5.nx + echo '**** GENERATING kernel ABI metadata ****' **** GENERATING kernel ABI metadata **** + gzip -c9 + chmod 0755 /home/rpmbuild/SOURCES/kabitool + '[' '!' -e /home/rpmbuild/SOURCES/kabi_whitelist_x86_64 ']' + cp /home/rpmbuild/SOURCES/kabi_whitelist_x86_64 /var/tmp/kernel- 2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/kabi_whitelist + rm -f /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-kabideps + /home/rpmbuild/SOURCES/kabitool -b . -d /var/tmp/kernel- 2.6.18-53.el5.nx-kabideps -k 2.6.18-53.el5.nx -w /var/tmp/kernel- 2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/kabi_whitelist nm: net/decnet/built-in.o: no symbols nm: net/dccp/ccids/built-in.o: no symbols nm: net/dccp/built-in.o: no symbols nm: sound/core/built-in.o: no symbols nm: drivers/isdn/hardware/built-in.o: no symbols nm: drivers/i2c/built-in.o: no symbols nm: drivers/media/dvb/built-in.o: no symbols nm: drivers/media/built-in.o: no symbols nm: drivers/scsi/built-in.o: no symbols nm: drivers/net/wireless/built-in.o: no symbols nm: drivers/message/built-in.o: no symbols + echo '**** kABI checking is enabled in kernel SPEC file. ****' **** kABI checking is enabled in kernel SPEC file. **** + chmod 0755 /home/rpmbuild/SOURCES/check-kabi + '[' -e /home/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Module.kabi_x86_64 ']' + cp /home/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Module.kabi_x86_64 /var/tmp/kernel- 2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/Module.kabi + /home/rpmbuild/SOURCES/check-kabi -k /var/tmp/kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.nx-root/Module.kabi -s Module.symvers *** ERROR - ABI BREAKAGE WAS DETECTED *** The following symbols have been changed (this will cause an ABI breakage): cfi_varsize_frob unregister_mtd_chip_driver cfi_read_pri register_mtd_chip_driver mtd_do_chip_probe do_map_probe + exit 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2757 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2757 (%build) Should I exclude the kabi (and if so why is it not excluded by default)? What else did I miss? Thanks. mhr PS: I know I could build that as a module, but that shouldn't make the kernel build fail....

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Announcing the CentOS on Laptops initiative
by Dag Wieers 04 Dec '07

04 Dec '07

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Alfredo Perez wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:02:40PM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Johnny Tan wrote: > > > Lorenzo Quatrini wrote: > > > > I'm actually using CentOS on 2 laptops, and I have really few issues: > > > > on the newer one (a Lenovo) the only thing that doesn't work is sound (I > > > > know the newer alsa drivers would work, but I'm too lazy to install them: > > > > I'll wait for the updates) but it isn't a big deal: I'm using it for work, > > > > and I don't need sound > > > > > > Or, if we create a page on there, should multiple entries of the same laptop > > > model go on the same line somehow? > > > > What I prefer is to have one single page per Laptop model. And a different > > section for each CentOS version (starting with the latest, CentOS-5 > > first). > > > > If people have their own blog articles or webpages about their laptop > > model, I would like to have this information reside inside of that page > > (now they are on the index page temporarily). > > > > Sadly, for now, you have to request access to be allowed to create or edit > > these pages. I hope in the future we will have a more liberal view wrt. > > the wiki. > > > > PS I created this structure for your X60 for now, I plan to add my own > > laptops soon (but it does not include a X60). If you can add your > > information to this existing page, I am sure this is very valuable for > > another X60 owner. > > Last weekend I tried to install Centos 5.0 into my old Toshiba 4200. > No luck. The installation process stop in different places. > > Any recommendations? Do you have more information ? Where exactly did it stop ? What was in the log ? Maybe try again with CentOS 5.1 ? > I tried Startcom which is also redhat based and the installation > process ended successfully. Not sure if StartCom is RHEL. They have a release called 5.0.6, but no clue to what that matches. What version of StartCom did you use ? > I will keep trying to see if I can get my laptop to run Centos. > I will also share my findings when trying to get my laptop to connect > to the internet using bcm43xx using fwcutter, if that is ok you guys? Great. -- -- dag wieers, dag(a)centos.org, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]

1 0

[Fwd: dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1]
by Gregory P. Ennis 04 Dec '07

04 Dec '07

Everyone, Looks like my Centos 5.0 mail server upgraded automatically last night to 5.1. It appears to have worked normally until about 16:00 CST when dovecot began to fail. I have rebooted the system to be able to use the 5.1 kernel, but dovecot still continues to fail. Has anyone else made this observation? My log entries are below Thanks in advance!!!! Greg Ennis ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dec 3 19:11:29 Mail dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.rc15 starting up Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail dovecot: Temporary failure in creating login processes, slo wing down for now Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail dovecot: imap-login: imap-login: error while loading shared libraries: libsepol.so.1: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allo cate memory Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail last message repeated 2 times Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail dovecot: pop3-login: pop3-login: error while loading shared libraries: libsepol.so.1: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allo cate memory Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail last message repeated 2 times Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail dovecot: child 7342 (login) returned error 127 Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail dovecot: child 7343 (login) returned error 127 Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail dovecot: child 7344 (login) returned error 127 Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail dovecot: child 7345 (login) returned error 127 Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail dovecot: child 7346 (login) returned error 127 Dec 3 19:11:30 Mail dovecot: child 7347 (login) returned error 127 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Do you have SELinux turned on? If so, do things begin working if you turn it off? Best, ------------------------------------------------------------------- Good suggestion, but I do have it disabled. I have SeLinux on my wish list to understand, but for now it is disabled. Greg

2 1

dovecot errors after upgrade to 5.1
by Gregory P. Ennis 04 Dec '07

04 Dec '07

3 3

Silly question about 5.1
by David G. Miller 04 Dec '07

04 Dec '07

I just rebooted my desktop system to pick up the 5.1 kernel, etc. One oddity I noticed is that the contents of /etc/redhat-release still says: [root@bend etc]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5 (Final) but: [root@bend etc]# rpm -q --whatprovides /etc/redhat-release centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1 On my CentOS 4 box, /etc/redhat-release says: [dave@fraud ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 4.5 (Final) Shouldn't /etc/redhat-release on the CentOS 5 box say "5.1?" Cheers, Dave -- Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. -- Ambrose Bierce

3 3

Scary memory requirements for 5.1 graphic install
by Robert Moskowitz 04 Dec '07

04 Dec '07

It is listed as a known issue, but I have a lot of 256Mb systems where I have used the graphic installer.... OUCH! And when this is fixed (I really hope), it will mean some new ISOs to download?

5 6

Missing samba security update
by Marc Deslauriers 04 Dec '07

04 Dec '07

Hi, In November, upstream released RHSA-2007:1016-4 containing critical samba updates for v4. I see the CentOS released packages and announcement for ia64, but none for i386 or x86_64. Were they overlooked? Am I not looking right? Thanks! Marc.

2 1

CentOS 5 and removing sendmail
by Joseph L. Casale 03 Dec '07

03 Dec '07

Hi, I want to build a spam gateway for my mail server using postfix. I issued an rpm -e sendmail and got the following output: # rpm -e sendmail error: Failed dependencies: /usr/sbin/sendmail is needed by (installed) redhat-lsb-3.1-12.2.EL.el5.centos.i386 smtpdaemon is needed by (installed) mutt-1.4.2.2-3.el5.i386 smtpdaemon is needed by (installed) fetchmail-6.3.6-1.el5.i386 smtpdaemon is needed by (installed) mdadm-2.5.4-3.el5.i386 How does one replace sendmail with postfix (I am hoping to install from source using the latest version)? Thanks! jlc

15 26

Local repository via createrepo assumes apache?
by Robert Moskowitz 03 Dec '07

03 Dec '07

I am looking at the howtos for using createrepo to make a local repository. Like the one at: http://jazzz1s.blogspot.com/2007/10/creating-local-yum-repository-centos.ht… It seems that I need to run apache on the repository server. But I can basically run with defaults? All the howtos I have found address [base] and [update] but not others like [add-on] should those be set up as well?

2 1

pcre vs. regexp for Postfix checks
by Miark 03 Dec '07

03 Dec '07

What are your opinions on pcre vs regexp for header_, body_, and mime_checks in Postfix? I looked at the regexp_table and prce_table man pages, and see almost no difference other than the available flags. Miark

4 3

← Newer
1
...
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss December 2007