Discuss August 2015

discuss@lists.centos.org

133 participants
127 discussions

MISSING Centos-Base.repo File.
by Marc Chubbuck 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

I need help fast folks. I am trying to repair a damaged CentOS 7 server that houses my hosting, etc. I found that I am missing alot of the base repo files. Can anyone help me? Either posting file contents for the repos or sending the files?

2 1

How to search in mailing list
by Meikel 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

Hi folks, I want to search the CentOS mailing list(s) for how to upgrade from PHP 5.3.3 to 5.4 (or higher) on CentOS 6.7. From "CentOS Mailing Lists and Posting Guidelines" I can see "All public mailing lists are archived and those archives are searchable - there's a search box in the upper left corner on each of the lists listinfo page." Then after opening http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos (which from my understanding is the "listinfo page") I don't see any search functionality. Just to be sure I followed to the CentOS archieves at http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/ which as well doesn't contain any search functionality. Can please someone point me to where I can search the CentOS mailing list? Regards, Meikel

4 5

Hello everybody
by Martin Zhou 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

* Hi, I am Martin, coming from the east of china, is a novice for Linux. Kindly give me your advice. Thanks.

4 4

CentOS7 KDE - post-boot splash screen
by Mike - st257 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

Hello List Members, I decided to install C7 KDE on a workstation for a friend of mine. Works great, but the post-boot KDE splash screen (light blue and has 3 or more up ^ arrows that move from the lower center upwards) is a bit of a frustration for that person. I've determined that one can press the Escape key and move from that bluish splash to the login screen. (And at one point rolling the wheel on the mouse worked too, but didn't consistently cause the transition from splash to login screen.) At this point I think it's more ideal to just disable the splash screen and instead have the system go straight to the login screen (where user names are listed). Can that be done? Here's to hoping a KDE user or two on this list knows a solution. ;-) Thanks! -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 //

3 5

camgirl spam on the list
by Tim Dunphy 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

Hey guys, I just noticed this recently in my latest posts to the list. But I've noticed that every time I mail the list for some advice, I get hit with spam from a camgirl site like every other message. Kinda funny actually. But also annoying!! Anyone else experience this? Maybe this is something the admins/moderators can take care of! Thanks, Tim -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B

10 11

CentOS 7.1 NFS Client Issues - rpc.statd / rpcbind
by Mark Selby 31 Aug '15

31 Aug '15

I have seen some talk about this but have not seen any answers. I know this is a problem on CentOS 7.1 and I also think it is a problem on CentOS 7.0. Basically if I have an NFS client only config - meaning that the nfs-server.service is not enabled then I have to wait 60 seconds after boot for the 1st NFSV3 mount to succeed. What I can surmise is the following. I attempt to perform a NFS mount a newly booted machine and systemd via listening sockets (1) starts rpc.statd (fails) (2) starts rpcbind (3) rpc.statd timesout after 60 seconds and then starts sucessfully (3) performs the nfs mount I see that rpc.statd is attempted to start at the time that I perform the mount request - it just takes 60 seconds to start. I think this is because it tries to start before rpcbind is really stated and then waits a full 60 seconds before retying. It then succeeds because rpcbind is really started I can fix the delay by running 'systemctl start rpcbind' after I reboot which causes rpcbind to start and not just be socket activated. I see in the systemd manifest for rpc-statd that it does require rpcbind but I think systemd is trying to start rpc.statd before rpcbind which makes sense that this would not work. If I enable nfs-server.service then rpcbind does really get started but I loathe to start this on all clients Anyone have any ideas how to get rpcbind started before rpc.statd in a NFS client only config root /root 103# systemd-analyze blame 1min 87ms rpc-statd.service root@ls2 /root 79# systemctl list-units | grep rpc rpcbind.socket loaded active listening RPCbind Server Activation Socket Aug 30 18:17:14 ls2.tokenrain.name systemd: Starting NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking.... Aug 30 18:17:14 ls2.tokenrain.name rpc.statd[1938]: Version 1.3.0 starting Aug 30 18:17:14 ls2.tokenrain.name rpc.statd[1938]: Flags: TI-RPC Aug 30 18:17:14 ls2.tokenrain.name systemd: Starting RPC bind service... Aug 30 18:17:14 ls2.tokenrain.name systemd: Started RPC bind service. Aug 30 18:18:14 ls2.tokenrain.name systemd: Started NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking.. USER PID PPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT START TIME COMMAND root 1935 1924 0.0 0.0 115212 1436 ? S 18:17 00:00:00 /bin/bash -p /usr/sbin/start-statd root 1936 1935 0.0 0.0 132520 1196 ? S 18:17 00:00:00 systemctl start rpc-statd.service root 1937 1 0.0 0.0 44288 1676 ? Ss 18:17 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.statd --no-notify root 1938 1937 0.0 0.0 44484 1340 ? Ss 18:17 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.statd --no-notify USER PID PPID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT START TIME COMMAND rpcuser 1938 1 0.0 0.0 44484 1600 ? Ss 18:17 00:00:00 /usr/sbin/rpc.statd --no-notify

3 3

[OFFTOPIC] integrated LSI 3008 :: number of hdd support
by Adrian Sevcenco 30 Aug '15

30 Aug '15

Hi guys! Unfortunately there is no offtopic list but the subject is somehow related to centos as the OS is/will be centos :) So, under this thin cover i ask : Is it possible that for a SAS controler like LSI 3008 that in specs says that : "This high-performance I/O controller supports T-10 data protection model and optical support, PCIe hot plugging, and up to 1,000 connected devices" in a vendor implementation (motherboard integrated) to support only 8 (or 16) devices? The technical support from the OEM told me that "the onboard SAS controller maximum amount of supported harddrives is 16pcs" and "if you are planning on using more than 16 drives then you have to use a PCI-E card based SAS controller with external ports (which Supermicro does not sell)" and both statements sound insane to me! First, because the specs for 3008 says something else and i dont know how one can artificially reduce the number of supported hdds (beside the firmware - but why would one do that?) and the second statement is just hogwash as the externl/internal status of the ports have nothing to do with the sas cascading and the number of devices supported!! (and of course is really cheap to convert an internal port to an external port with a bracket) So, i ask you guys that have more knowledge and expertise: was this Senior Application Engineer that answered me a total incompetent? Thank you! Adrian

3 4

Mock build oddity
by Alice Wonder 30 Aug '15

30 Aug '15

When building packages in mock lately I see this a lot: error: Macro %py2_install has unterminated body Only started within last month, as far as I can tell the build actually finishes just fine. cause?

2 1

Re: [CentOS] please block user
by James B. Byrne 30 Aug '15

30 Aug '15

In consequence of this thread I went looking for a probe script that would send individualized email messages to each subscriber of a mailman list and found none. Does such a thing in fact exist? It seems to me that this would be an invaluable tool in tracking down which subscriber is the bot-bait. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3

5 4

please block user
by Alice Wonder 29 Aug '15

29 Aug '15

julie70773 [at] loverhearts.com Responded off-list to message on the list, spam with content that is not suitable for minors. It is possible subscribed under different address. IP of offending spam : Received: from mx2.loverhearts.com (mx2.loverhearts.com [45.55.128.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.domblogger.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4871C5B for <alice(a)domblogger.net>; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 18:29:11 +0000 (UTC)

15 49

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss August 2015