Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Start a nNew thread

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 34, Issue 2
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 02 Dec '07

02 Dec '07

1 0

Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??
by Robinson Tiemuqinke 02 Dec '07

02 Dec '07

Hi, Redhat announced RHEL 5.1 on Nov 07, so hopefully CentOS 5.1 will be ready shortly. But I get kind of nervous of the arrival of 5.1. My problem is: I have hundreds Centos 5.0 boxes just finished installation and I will continue to install and upgrade hundreds more in next few months. With the arrival of Centos 5.1, I don't like to reinstall them anymore but continuous upgrade instead -- if this is possible? Currently I download the Centos 5.0 upgrade packages from mirror sites on Internet (.../centos/5/updates/{SRPMS,i386,x86_64}/...), with the arrival of Centos 5.1, are the existing Centos 5.0 update packages will be removed in honor of Centos 5.1 updates? or it will stay? And how about the Centos 5.1's default packages in distro? Give an example here: 2.6.18-8.1.15 version kernel is the most recently updated kernel for Centos 5.0 distro, if the Centos 5.1 distro comes with 2.6.18-8.1.10000 kernel and in the first few weeks there are no kernel updates for 5.1, then how can I upgrade my kernel to 2.6.18-8.1.10000 naturally -- will the 2.6.18-8.1.10000 shows in the same update sources directories(.../centos/5/updates/{SRPMS,i386,x86_64/...)? A similar question is: are the update diretories contains only updates for 5.1 distro, or both 5.0 and 5.1? Any clarifications are greatly appreciated. --Robinson ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

10 15

Re: [CentOS] RESOLVED: Slightly OT: Conexant fax/modem not faxing with sendfax
by MHR 02 Dec '07

02 Dec '07

On Dec 1, 2007 5:23 PM, Robert <kerplop(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > All the more reason to quit wasting your time with that junk and go shopping for a USRobotics Courier v.everything -- external if you have a serial port available. I notice that there are several on ebay right now. If it has no manual included, download one from the mfr. > Lesson learned - I just hate to give on the free approach as long as it seems to be viable. (sigh) Thanks. mhr

1 0

Deleting a user?
by Amos Shapira 02 Dec '07

02 Dec '07

Hello, I've compiled linux-ha heartbeat into an RPM but when I try to install it (after "yum erase heartbeat*") it complains that the user hacluster still exists: # rpm -ivh heartbeat-2.1.2-1.x86_64.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] useradd: user hacluster exists error: %pre(heartbeat-2.1.2-1.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 9 error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping heartbeat-2.1.2-1 I ran "userdel -r hacluster" which just disabled the user login then edited /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow to remove this user completely, but I still get this error. What else can I do to remove this user and help useradd succeed? I'd rather not force script-skipping if at all possible. Thanks, --Amos

2 1

Looking for Insights
by Shawn Everett 01 Dec '07

01 Dec '07

Hi Guys, I had a strange problem yesterday and I'm curious as to what everyone thinks. I have a client with a Red Hat Enterprise 2.1 cluster. All quality HP equipment with an MSA 500 storage array acting as the shared storage between the two nodes in the cluster. This cluster is configured for reliability and not load balancing. All work is handled by one node or the other not both. There are two 100GB RAID 5 logical drives in the MSA500. Linux sees them as /dev/md2 and /dev/md3 respectively. Running cat /proc/mdstat shows them as "active multipath" and otherwise healthy. There is a nightly shell script that runs and backs up information via tar to a USB external drive. The last thing the script does before unmounting the USB drive is to run the sync command. Yesterday it was noticed that the backup script was hung. A quick check via "ps aux" showed the backup script and a sync process still hanging around from Monday night. All attempts to stop these processed failed and it was decided a reboot was the best fix. All production services where shut down as much as possible. Because of the locked processes the machine would hot shut down properly and was physically turned off. On reboot the drives in the server were checked via e2fsck with no problems. The shared storage: md2 and md3 also mounted without errors. All services started properly. No errors about md2 or md3 were reported in dmesg or /var/log/messages Strangely, all files added via Samba after Monday are gone. This is limited to only one device: md3. Everything else is fine. Checking the two drives/partitions that make up md3 show none of the missing files. Any brilliant thoughts as to where those files might have gone would be appreciated. The files lost are not critical so there are no major problems but it's a puzzle I can't quite figure out. Shawn

3 3

Dell Wireless WLAN Card Utility - mini-pci wireless card 1390
by Andrew Allen 01 Dec '07

01 Dec '07

Is there any way I can find a driver and/or get the above wireless card working in CentOS 5 on my Dell laptop (Inspiron 1501). I've installed ipw2200 from RPMForge, but it now appears that this won't work because the card is not an Intel PRO/Wireless card. Dell seem to support only MS Windows Vista now so I don't think there's much chance of getting a driver from them - so am I on a fruitless 'crusade' in trying to get wifi in CentOS 5 in this case? Any helpful advice much appreciated please? Thanks, Andy

6 11

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 34, Issue 1
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 01 Dec '07

01 Dec '07

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2007:1084 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 seamonkey - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CESA-2007:1082 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 firefox - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2007:1084 Critical CentOS 4 s390(x) seamonkey - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:31:28 +0200 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)centos.fi> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1084 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 seamonkey - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20071130163128.GM18540(a)centos.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1084 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1084.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored

1 0

Conexant fax/modem not faxing with sendfax
by MHR 01 Dec '07

01 Dec '07

I finally picked up a "real" modem (not a winmodem) and put it in my machine. I pulled down the hsfmodem driver from the source, got a license and installed the driver at full power. If I use wvdial, I can get out through the modem, so I know that works. However, sendfax is rejecting the fax capability (from /var/log/sendfax.log): 11/30 00:31:52 sendfax: interim release 1.1.33-Apr10 11/30 00:31:52 sendfax.c compiled at Jan 7 2007, 07:01:40 11/30 00:31:52 sending fax to 19496328403 11/30 00:31:52 checking WebOwnSig.ps 11/30 00:31:52 makelock(modem) called 11/30 00:31:52 do_makelock: lock='/var/lock/LCK..modem' 11/30 00:31:52 lock made 11/30 00:31:52 tss: set speed to 38400 (017) 11/30 00:31:52 tio_set_flow_control( HARD ) 11/30 00:31:52 dem fax_open_device succeeded, modem -> 4 11/30 00:31:52 dem reading specific data for port 'modem' 11/30 00:31:52 dem reading /etc/mgetty+sendfax/sendfax.config... 11/30 00:31:52 dem conf lib: read: 'verbose y' 11/30 00:31:52 dem conf lib: read: 'debug 5' 11/30 00:31:52 dem conf lib: read: 'fax-devices modem' 11/30 00:31:52 dem conf lib: read: 'fax-id 49 115 xxxxxxxx' 11/30 00:31:52 dem conf lib: read: 'max-tries 3' 11/30 00:31:52 dem conf lib: read: 'max-tries-continue y' 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'fax-devices', type=1, flags=4, data=(ignored) 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'modem-init', type=1, flags=0, data=(empty) 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'modem-handshake', type=1, flags=0, data=(empty) 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'modem-type', type=1, flags=1, data=auto 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'modem-quirks', type=0, flags=0, data=(empty) 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'fax-send-flow', type=4, flags=1, data=7 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'fax-rec-flow', type=4, flags=1, data=7 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'max-tries', type=0, flags=3, data=3 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'max-tries-continue', type=3, flags=3, data=TRUE 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'speed', type=0, flags=1, data=38400 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'switchbd', type=0, flags=1, data=0 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'open-delay', type=0, flags=0, data=(empty) 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'ignore-carrier', type=3, flags=1, data=TRUE 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'dial-prefix', type=1, flags=1, data=ATD 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'fax-id', type=1, flags=3, data=49 115 xxxxxxxx 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'poll-dir', type=1, flags=1, data=. 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'normal-res', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'fax-min-speed', type=0, flags=1, data=0 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'fax-max-speed', type=0, flags=1, data=14400 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'debug', type=0, flags=3, data=5 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'verbose', type=3, flags=3, data=TRUE 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: '', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: 'page-header', type=1, flags=0, data=(empty) 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: '', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: '', type=3, flags=1, data=FALSE 11/30 00:31:52 dem key: '', type=1, flags=1, data= 11/30 00:31:52 dem tss: set speed to 38400 (017) 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_send: 'ATV1Q0' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'ATV1Q0' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'OK' -> OK 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_send: 'ATI' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_gis: string 1: '56000' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_identify: string '56000' 11/30 00:31:52 dem Generic Rockwell modem (56000) 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_send: 'ATI3' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_gis: string 1: 'hsfmodem-7.68.00.04x86_64full' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_send: 'ATI4' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_gis: string 1: 'Conexant HSF softmodem' 11/30 00:31:52 dem additional info: 'Conexant HSF softmodem' 11/30 00:31:52 dem modem quirks: 0004 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_send: 'AT+FCLASS=2' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'AT+FCLASS=2' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'ERROR' -> ERROR 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_send: 'AT+FCLASS=2.0' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'AT+FCLASS=2.0' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'ERROR' -> ERROR 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_send: 'AT+FCLASS=2' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'AT+FCLASS=2' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'ERROR' -> ERROR 11/30 00:31:52 ##### failed: no class 2/2.0 fax modem, dev=modem 11/30 00:31:52 dem fax_send: 'AT+FCLASS=0' 11/30 00:31:53 dem removing lock file Is there a newer version of sendfax I should get? This was the latest one available from yum on CentOS 5.0. I also tried using 'fax' (in the efax package), and it also failed: /usr/bin/efax: Fri Nov 30 01:19:25 2007 efax v 0.9 Copyright 1999 Ed Casas efax: 19:25 compiled Jan 7 2007 02:20:44 efax: 19:25 TIFF version 4.2 file (little-endian) efax: 19:25 TIFF directory at 8 with 20 tags, last image. efax: 19:25 page 1 : WebOwnSig.ps.001 + 338 : 1728x2156 @ 204x196 dpi TIFF/FAX efax: 19:25 TIFF version 4.2 file (little-endian) efax: 19:25 TIFF directory at 8 with 20 tags, last image. efax: 19:25 page 2 : WebOwnSig.ps.002 + 338 : 1728x2156 @ 204x196 dpi TIFF/FAX efax: 19:25 TIFF version 4.2 file (little-endian) efax: 19:25 TIFF directory at 8 with 20 tags, last image. efax: 19:25 page 3 : WebOwnSig.ps.003 + 338 : 1728x2156 @ 204x196 dpi TIFF/FAX efax: 19:25 argv[0]=/usr/bin/efax efax: 19:25 argv[1]=-v efax: 19:25 argv[2]=ewin efax: 19:25 argv[3]=-v efax: 19:25 argv[4]=chewmainrxtf efax: 19:25 argv[5]=-d/dev/modem efax: 19:25 argv[6]=-x efax: 19:25 argv[7]=/var/lock/LCK..modem efax: 19:25 argv[8]=-iZ efax: 19:25 argv[9]=-i&FE&D2S7=120 efax: 19:25 argv[10]=-i&C0 efax: 19:25 argv[11]=-iM1L0 efax: 19:25 argv[12]=-l efax: 19:25 argv[13]=+0 000 000 0000 efax: 19:25 argv[14]=-kZ efax: 19:25 argv[15]=-h efax: 19:25 argv[16]=2007/11/30 01:19 +0 000 000 0000 from a Red Hat Linux system p. %d/%d efax: 19:25 argv[17]=-t efax: 19:25 argv[18]=T19496328403 efax: 19:25 argv[19]=WebOwnSig.ps.001 efax: 19:25 argv[20]=WebOwnSig.ps.002 efax: 19:25 argv[21]=WebOwnSig.ps.003 efax: 19:25 created text lock file /var/lock/LCK..modem efax: 19:25 opened (null) efax: 19:25 command "Q0V1" efax: 19:25 waiting 2.0 s efax: 19:25 .592 [ATQ0V1<CR><CR><LF>] efax: 19:25 .592 [OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:25 response "OK" efax: 19:25 command "Z" efax: 19:25 waiting 5.0 s efax: 19:25 .720 [ATZ<CR><CR><LF>] efax: 19:25 .720 [OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:25 response "OK" efax: 19:25 command "&FE&D2S7=120" efax: 19:25 waiting 5.0 s efax: 19:25 .847 [AT&FE&D2S7=120<CR><CR><LF>] efax: 19:25 .847 [OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:25 response "OK" efax: 19:25 command "&C0" efax: 19:25 waiting 5.0 s efax: 19:25 .970 [<CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:25 response "OK" efax: 19:26 command "M1L0" efax: 19:26 waiting 5.0 s efax: 19:26 .093 [<CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:26 response "OK" efax: 19:26 command "E0" efax: 19:26 waiting 5.0 s efax: 19:26 .216 [<CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:26 response "OK" efax: 19:26 command "I3" efax: 19:26 waiting 5.0 s efax: 19:26 .339 [<CR><LF>hsfmodem-7.68.00.04x86_64full<CR><LF>] efax: 19:26 .339 [OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:26 response "OK" efax: 19:26 command "+FCLASS=?" efax: 19:26 waiting 5.0 s efax: 19:26 .462 [<CR><LF>0,1,1.0<CR><LF>] efax: 19:26 .462 [<CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:26 response "OK" efax: 19:26 command "+FCLASS=1" efax: 19:26 waiting 5.0 s efax: 19:26 .563 [<CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:26 response "OK" efax: 19:26 using (ûin class efax: 19:26 Error: terminating on signal -1789414544 efax: 19:26 failed -> efax: 19:26 failed -> efax: 19:26 failed -> efax: 19:26 command "Q0V1" efax: 19:26 waiting 2.0 s efax: 19:26 .687 [<CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:26 response "OK" efax: 19:26 command "Z" efax: 19:26 waiting 5.0 s efax: 19:26 .793 [<CR><LF>OK<CR><LF>] efax: 19:26 response "OK" efax: 19:26 read HDB pid 15315 [ 15315<LF>] from /var/lock/LCK..modem (our pid) efax: 19:26 removed lock file /var/lock/LCK..modem The output from the fax program on the command line was: fax send 19496328403 WebOwnSig.ps WebOwnSig.ps.nnn is up-to-date /usr/bin/efax: Fri Nov 30 01:19:25 2007 efax v 0.9 Copyright 1999 Ed Casas efax: 19:25 opened /dev/modem efax: 19:26 using hsfmodem-7.68.00.04x86_64full in class 1 efax: 19:26 Error: terminating on signal 11 efax: 19:26 failed -> WebOwnSig.ps.001 efax: 19:26 failed -> WebOwnSig.ps.002 efax: 19:26 failed -> WebOwnSig.ps.003 efax: 19:26 done, returning 5 (terminated by signal) /usr/bin/fax: line 858: 15315 Segmentation fault $NICE $EFAX -v "$VERB" -v "$VERBLOG" -d/dev/$DEV $LOCK $INIT $SPKR $CLASSINIT $FCINIT $TXINIT $TXCAP -l "$FROM" $RESET $HDRFONT -h "$HDR" $MANINIT -t "$TELNO" $FILES >$logfile Any advice? Thanks. mhr

2 1

Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h
by Amos Shapira 30 Nov '07

30 Nov '07

On 30/11/2007, Alfredo Perez <alfredoj69(a)rogers.com> wrote: > Furthermore, this question is for the list > > I have a Centos 5 server running sshd > for me to signon and check my emails. > > I use denyhosts to protect port 22. > > Is there anyother software you people use > to protect your servers. There are a few such programs floating around. Do you confine yourself to CentOS packages? denyhosts is apparently a good one. Personally, I don't use any - once I moved to a non-standard port I've never seen anyone knocking on my SSH server's door. --Amos

1 0

RE: [CentOS] CleanLog.h
by Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 30 Nov '07

30 Nov '07

By any chances, have you ran 'ps ax' from root and looked to see what does not look like it should be there?? IF you are willing, paste your 'ps' output for us to help you find the program that is running and sending out the emails. also review your sendmail rule set. Next, to help lock down your server a little more make sure you have set a password on your VNC. I had and Italian 17 year old poking around one of my Amateur Radio boxes via VNC, simply cause I forgot to set a vnc password, so it was wide open like a windoz server box without a login screen, you know, the good old "I AM OPEN FOR YOUR PLEASURES..." Also change your sshd, the port it is on, and do a rule set that only allows a specific ip to access it. I think I am correct saying you can do that as well with VNC. The other option would be to stop the service all together IF your not needing it. Good Luck. Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM/AFA2TH/WQFK-894 -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Alfredo Perez Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 7:40 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:43:44PM -0600, B.J. McClure wrote: > Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a > Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. > It appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be > deleted) and /sys/bus/serio/drivers/atkbd/description. The latter > file is also present in identical uninfected machines. I have been > unable to open the file, even with root privileges, although it > appears to be a text file. Any suggestions on how to proceed > appreciated. Guess I could delete it and copy over the file from an identical machine. > > Thanks in advance, > B.J. > > CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 x86_64 16:26:48 up 10:46, 1 user, > load average: 0.07, 0.08, 0.04 Hi Can you tell me which virus scan you are using? Thanks _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

4 3

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss