Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Installing Google's Picasa for Linux on CentOS 5
by Lanny Marcus 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

On 06 November 2007, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: <snip> >Hmmm does the package look good with a >rpm -K picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm Stephen: I downloaded the .rpm file from Google again. This time, I was logged in as root. First, I downloaded the file to the Desktop. I double clicked on the Icon. Supposedly, the installation was successful, according to the Package Manager. Then, I moved the file to /tmp as Google suggests if there is a problem, and I tried to install it from a shell. Same thing. I got the below error. How did you install it? Are you using SELinux? Do you know if Picasa is available in a Yum repository, packaged for CentOS5? Since you have it running, I know it can be done. TIA, Lanny [root@dell2400 ~]# rpm -Uvh /tmp/picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm warning: /tmp/picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 7fac5991 Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:picasa ########################################### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /opt/picasa/lib/libfreetype.so;4730c479: cpio: symlink failed - Operation not permitted [root@dell2400 ~]#

2 1

Re: [CentOS] Installing Google's Picasa for Linux on CentOS
by Lanny Marcus 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

On 06 November 2007, Matt Hyclak hyclak at math.ohiou.edu wrote: >It didn't take long to google "Google RPM Key" and come up with: >http://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/index.html >Specifically the RPM page has the info you need to import their key. Matt: I get the Digest edition. I came up with the above, before I read your reply online, and I have that key installed, but as you can see from my post previous to this one, installing the key did not solve the problem. Had I not come up with their key, your reply was dead on and is much appreciated! Thank you! Lanny

1 0

Re: [CentOS] Installing Google's Picasa for Linux on CentOS
by Lanny Marcus 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

On 06 November 2007, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: <snip> >Hmmm does the package look good with a >rpm -K picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm I Google'd and Yahood' and found a post that mentioned adding a Yum Repository for Google. I now have this repository: [google] name=Google - $basearch baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/rpm/stable/$basearch enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 priority=20 But, when I try to yum install picasa, it ends with: Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: picasa i386 2.2.2820-5 google 21 M Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 1 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 21 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 7fac5991 Public key for picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm is not installed [root@dell2400 ~]# When I have more time, I will try to find a place on Google where I can ask about the public key that is missing. Stephen, I don't know how you got it to install, but, I'm glad that you did get it to install. Lanny

3 2

Re: [CentOS] Installing Google's Picasa for Linux on CentOS 5
by Lanny Marcus 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

>[CentOS] Installing Google's Picasa for Linux on CentOS 5 On 06 November 2007, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: <snip> >Hmmm does the package look good with a >rpm -K picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm [lanny@dell2400 ~]$ rpm -K picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG# 7fac5991) [lanny@dell2400 ~] Stephen: Thank you! I will download the .rpm file again and try it again. I tried to install with yum, but apparently it's not in rpmforge. Good to know that you have it running! -- Lanny

1 0

Installing Google's Picasa for Linux on CentOS 5
by Lanny Marcus 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

I downloaded the .rpm file from Google and am trying to install Picasa for Linux on CentOS 5. I get the below error. Is this because I'm using SELinux or because of something else? I found a small Picasa folder in /opt (24 items, 143.7 KB) but it seems to end there. Picasa is one of the programs my wife uses on Windows. TIA! [root@dell2400 lanny]# rpm -Uvh picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm warning: picasa-2.2.2820-5.i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 7fac5991 Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:picasa ########################################### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /opt/picasa/lib/libfreetype.so;4730b5c2: cpio: symlink failed - Operation not permitted [root@dell2400 lanny]# -- Lanny --------------------------------------------------------- Over 800 Magazine titles up to 85% off http://lowcostmagazines.com/

2 1

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 33, Issue 4
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2007:0966 Important CentOS 3 i386 perl - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2007:0966 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 perl - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2007:0968 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 pcre - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 4. CESA-2007:0968 Critical CentOS 4 s390(x) pcre - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 5. CESA-2007:0966 Important CentOS 4 ia64 perl - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2007:0966 Important CentOS 3 ia64 perl - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 18:35:41 +0100 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:0966 Important CentOS 3 i386 perl - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20071105173541.GA26884(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0966 perl security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0966.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/perl-5.8.0-97.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/perl-CGI-2.89-97.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/perl-CPAN-1.61-97.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/perl-DB_File-1.806-97.EL3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/perl-suidperl-5.8.0-97.EL3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/perl-5.8.0-97.EL3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update perl\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

anyone using DBMail?
by Florin Andrei 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

I am currently using Cyrus IMAPd, and been using it for a long time, the main reason being that I want an IMAP server with nice server-side filtering, which Cyrus provides via Sieve. Given that Sieve is integrated with Squirrelmail, all is good. Or is it? Cyrus IMAPd is powerful, but it's a complete mess to upgrade, either when upgrading the software per se, or when upgrading the whole OS. There are just too many "moving parts", complicated by the fact that it interacts with SELinux. And so on. So I'm kind of starting to hate it. But recently Freshmeat reminded me of DBMail: http://www.dbmail.org/ And today I noticed that DBMail uses Sieve. Very nice! Now, storing email in a database might be a controversial idea. I can definitely see at the same time some advantages, but also some disadvantages. However, for an IMAP server that essentially is used only by two people, I don't think the database per se can be a problem. So, what I'm asking is: Anybody here using DBMail? Any success stories? Horror stories? "Meh" stories? If I do end up using it, most likely I'll use ver 2.2.5 (available in the EPEL repo) with CentOS 5, probably with a MySQL backend (but I'm not sure yet, SQLite might be another option). -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

7 9

what is it in dmesg?
by ann kok 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

Hi all The machine provides the name service I got the following in the dmesg. What is it? Can I have rules to prevent it? UDP: bad checksum. From outside-ip:61479 to machine-ip:61 ulen 45 UDP: bad checksum. From outside-ip:62499 to machine-ip:61 ulen 45 UDP: bad checksum. From outside-ip:64135 to machine-ip:61 ulen 45 UDP: bad checksum. From outside-ip:64135 to machine-ip:61 ulen 45 UDP: bad checksum. From outside-ip:65383 to machine-ip:61 ulen 45 outside-ip sent an invalid ICMP type 3, code 3 error to a broadcast: 248.32.x.x on eth0 outside-ip sent an invalid ICMP type 3, code 3 error to a broadcast: 248.32.x.x on eth0 outside-ip sent an invalid ICMP type 3, code 3 error to a broadcast: 248.32.x.x on eth0 Thank you __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

Installing NTFS-3G
by Ern jura 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

When I tried installing ntfs 3g on CentOS 5 I got an error telling me it needed FUSE >= 2.6 I got FUSE but on attempting to install it it gives the following error: Fuse configure error checking kernel source directory... Not found configure: error: *** Please specify the location of the kernel source with *** the '--with-kernel=SRCDIR' option configure: error: ./configure failed for kernel Please let me know how to walk around this

3 2

help with script
by Mark Snyder 05 Nov '07

05 Nov '07

I feel like a dummy, got everything working correctly now. I want to say thanks to all for the input/help.

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss