Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34758 discussions

Re: [CentOS] Will Firefox 2.X be included/supported in CentOS 5?
by David G. Miller 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos(a)br-online.de> wrote: > David G. Miller wrote: > >> > Alfred von Campe <alfred(a)110.net> wrote: >> > >> >>> > >I know this mostly depends on what is/will be done upstream, but with >>> > >the recent announcement that Firefox 1.5.X will only receive updates >>> > >until April 24, 2007, is Firefox 2.X in CentOS' future? >>> > > >>> > >Alfred >>> >> > As of beta 2 the answer seems to be "no": >> > > Which beta2? > > Ralph I'm running CentOS 5 beta 2 on a test box. You can find the links to the current beta ISOs, release notes, etc. on the CentOS main web page (the i386 and x86_54 ISOs are under http://beta.centos.org/centos/4.92/isos/) The estimate was for CentOS to trail RHEL 5 by about two weeks. This implies that we should see a production release of CentOS fairly soon but feel free to give the beta a whirl if you want. I'm currently running FC6 and CentOS 4.4 on different boxes for hardware support so I'm trying to get a jump on moving to only running CentOS 5 and not having to chase the latest Fedora version. Cheers, Dave -- Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. -- Ambrose Bierce

1 0

PGP files sent via FTP over SSL (FTPS)
by Karl R. Balsmeier 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Can you send a PGP file over FTPS, and which Centos FTP daemon option supports this?

1 0

SATA RAID card recommendation?
by Florin Andrei 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

I need a SATA RAID PCI card that works well with CentOS and is fully supported. Mandatory features: - works with the drivers already in the kernel, no additional drivers - can do RAID 0, 1 and 5 - hotswap - allows to monitor the status of the array and of each individual drive via a script (ideally run from cron) - works with very large SATA drives Nice to have features but not mandatory: - small battery to keep the array alive until the write buffers are flushed after a power loss Anyone having positive experience with SATA RAID, please comment. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

9 22

Firefox 2
by Josep M. 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Hello. I use Centos 4.4 x86_64 with firefox 1.5.0.10 64 bits with nspluginwrapper and runs reasonable well. I would like know if there is rpm packages for firefox 2.0.0.2 or 2.0.0.3 and if will run well under Centos x86_64 if someone has tried. Thanks Josep --------------------------------- LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com

3 2

Re: [CentOS] Will Firefox 2.X be included/supported in CentOS 5?
by David G. Miller 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Alfred von Campe <alfred(a)110.net> wrote: > I know this mostly depends on what is/will be done upstream, but with > the recent announcement that Firefox 1.5.X will only receive updates > until April 24, 2007, is Firefox 2.X in CentOS' future? > > Alfred As of beta 2 the answer seems to be "no": [dave@fold ~]# rpm -q firefox firefox-1.5.0.8-1.el5.centos.1 [dave@fold ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 4.92 (Beta) This was discussed extensively on the fedora list. Red Hat will continue to provide updates to Firefox 1.5 as per their support agreement for RHEL. RH *may* choose to upgrade RHEL 5 to Firefox 2.0 but whatever version is the official version will be supported as long as the RHEL release is supported. Cheers, Dave -- Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. -- Ambrose Bierce

2 1

VIA C3 Nehemiah Locks Up
by Chris Miller 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Hello, I've got an EPIA-M series motherboard in a system that has locked up twice under random conditions. Nothing is logged to the console or logs, the system just hangs. The system is installed with CentOS 4.4 and running the 2.6.9-42.0.8.EL i686 kernel. I am aware that older C3 processors had the CMOV problem, but that is resolved in the later boards (procinfo below). I've seen a few posts about similar problems, but it's not clear whether this is a bad board, or if there's an issue with the kernel. cpuspeed was running, I've since disabled and stopped the service as it's been rumored to cause problems. This was mentioned in this bug report that is still open : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1270 Can anyone confirm that there are no known problems with the VIA C3 Nehemiah Model 9 and CentOS, or if some (kernel) tweaks are required to make these systems stable? Regards, Chris Board Info : http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/mainboards/motherboards.jsp?motherboard_i… # cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu family : 6 model : 9 model name : VIA Nehemiah stepping : 8 cpu MHz : 534.860 cache size : 64 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr cx8 mtrr pge cmov pat mmx fxsr sse rng rng_en ace ace_en bogomips : 1070.44 # lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8623 [Apollo CLE266] 00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8633 [Apollo Pro266 AGP] 00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6105 [Rhine-III] (rev 8b) 00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 80) 00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 80) 00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 80) 00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 82) 00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge 00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06) 00:12.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 74) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8623 [Apollo CLE266] integrated CastleRock graphics (rev 03)

2 1

Will Firefox 2.X be included/supported in CentOS 5?
by Alfred von Campe 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

I know this mostly depends on what is/will be done upstream, but with the recent announcement that Firefox 1.5.X will only receive updates until April 24, 2007, is Firefox 2.X in CentOS' future? Alfred

4 4

HP DL585 G2 -- no nics
by Castello, Jean-pierre 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Hello try to boot with pci=nommconf kernel option. Regards, Jean-Pierre

3 3

Vsftpd/Centos Issue: Client Time Display Wrong
by Karl R. Balsmeier 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Hi, We have patched Centos 4.4 to work properly with the recent DST changes, but our customers are reporting wrong FTP client timestamps based on which areas they live in. What are the two main mechanisms in Centos that control time? I know about /etc/localtime and TZDATA, is there something we may have missed? Or is this perhaps a VSFTPd thing and I could go bug that list? To be clear, -i'm asking: How would you verify your Centos system was completely sound and properly set for time changes like DST? I did all of our servers going back all the way to Solaris 7, but this seems uniquely to do with my centos4.3 machines running vsftpd. If you can drop a command line or two on me to determine the time settings are OK, that would be a great start. Notice i'm not asking for a solution to the whole issue, but just a starter set of 'grep this, enter that' forensics, so I can nail down which of the two mechanisms are in error, specific to centos 4.3, 4.4. -karlski

1 1

apache error
by Mark Quitoriano 22 Mar '07

22 Mar '07

Hi, i restarted my apache and now im getting this error. Stopping httpd: [FAILED] Starting httpd: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:80 no listening sockets available, shutting down Unable to open logs [FAILED]

3 3

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss