Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

34753 discussions

Re: su, context(selinux?) 2nd prompt
by Rex Dieter 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

Daniel J Walsh wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Rex Dieter wrote: >>> >>> >>>> With a recent update of CentOS4, su's behavior has changed, in that >>>> after >>>> prompting for password, also prompts for (selinux?) context. I'm >>>> seeing something like: >>>> $ su >>>> Password: >>>> Your default context is root:system_r:unconfined_t. >>>> >>>> Do you want to choose a different one? [n] >>>> >>>> >>>> kde's kdesu barfs on this second prompt. Any way to disable this >>>> second prompt? > Remove multiple from the pam file. editing /etc/pam.d/su, changing session required /lib/security/$ISA/pam_selinux.so open multiple to session required /lib/security/$ISA/pam_selinux.so open Did the trick, thanks Dan! # rpm -q -f /etc/pam.d/su coreutils-5.2.1-31.2 A bug in coreutils-5.2.1-31.2 then? -- Rex

1 0

RE: [CentOS] RE: Broadcom NIC Binding under Centos 4.2
by ABOKHALAF, Nassri Abdellatif 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

Hello > Have a look at /proc/net/bonding/bond0 Here it is...seems like it's only fault tolerant. I'll be tweaking with the modes like Robin suggested. Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v2.6.1 (October 29, 2004) Bonding Mode: fault-tolerance (active-backup) Primary Slave: None Currently Active Slave: eth0 MII Status: up MII Polling Interval (ms): 100 Up Delay (ms): 0 Down Delay (ms): 0 Slave Interface: eth0 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 1 Permanent HW addr: 00:15:60:ad:a0:8a Slave Interface: eth1 MII Status: up Link Failure Count: 1 Permanent HW addr: 00:15:60:ad:a0:89 Nassri

1 0

su, context(selinux?) 2nd prompt
by Rex Dieter 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

With a recent update of CentOS4, su's behavior has changed, in that after prompting for password, also prompts for (selinux?) context. I'm seeing something like: $ su Password: Your default context is root:system_r:unconfined_t. Do you want to choose a different one? [n] kde's kdesu barfs on this second prompt. Any way to disable this second prompt? -- Rex

3 6

X11 build
by Jerry Geis 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

On 1/23/06, Jerry Geis <geisj at pagestation.com <http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos>> wrote: >/ Morning... />/ />/ I have a package that I think wants to compile against the X11 source tree. />/ http://openchrome.org - its a snapshot from there.... />/ />/ Anyway the command it tells me to run is: />/ />/ xmkmf /usr/src/xc />/ make />/ make install />/ />/ />/ This is to build a updated X graphics driver... />/ However when I do this I get errors as there is not /usr/src/xc (no />/ surprise) />/ I did then "up2date xorg-x11-sdk" however now I dont know where the />/ "xc" directory might be. />/ />/ Have I not done the right steps yet? />/ />/ Thanks for any suggestions. / >There are src rpms for available on that site for fedora core 3 and >fedora core 4. What you want is not in centos, and you'd probably be >best off rebuilding from their src.rpms >With all the system mods you seem to be doing, it feels like you're >trying to shoehorn a server distro into very modern/unsupported >hardware? Are you sure you've picked the right distro for the job, or >are you simply trying to locate a larger hammer with which to pound in >screws? Jim, Not really, the couple pieces of hardware that I have actually work fine with centos 4.2 - however - when I then want to connect something out of the ordinary like a monitor that does 1366x768 it is not supported in the current driver. My other monitor problem was the driver freezing up. New card will take care of that. Thanks, Jerry

1 0

RE: [CentOS] RE: Broadcom NIC Binding under Centos 4.2
by ABOKHALAF, Nassri Abdellatif 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

Hello Robin, > Add this line to the /etc/sysconfig/network > > VLAN=yes Done. Tested both interfaces & failover works nice. Thanks ! How do I check that both interfaces are working binded together ? Regards, Nassri

3 2

X11 build
by Jerry Geis 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

Morning... I have a package that I think wants to compile against the X11 source tree. http://openchrome.org - its a snapshot from there.... Anyway the command it tells me to run is: xmkmf /usr/src/xc make make install This is to build a updated X graphics driver... However when I do this I get errors as there is not /usr/src/xc (no surprise) I did then "up2date xorg-x11-sdk" however now I dont know where the "xc" directory might be. Have I not done the right steps yet? Thanks for any suggestions. Jerry

2 1

GFS and gnbd for 2.6.9-22.0.2 kernel
by carlopmart 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

hi all, Someboby knows when gfs and gbd will be released for 2.6.9-22.0.2 kernel?? Thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com

2 1

RFE: centos-announce subject line rearrange
by Farkas Levente 23 Jan '06

23 Jan '06

hi, it's a nice thing that we've a centos-announce list, but currently the subject of this mails on this list has very long lines. eg: ----------------------------------------- [CentOS-announce] CESA-2006:0160 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 tetex - security update [CentOS-announce] CESA-2006:0140 Important CentOS 3 ia64 kernel - security update ----------------------------------------- which means 1280x1024 sreen in mozilla the mailer's preview line is not wide enough to show thre real important part of the mail ie. the name of the package which is updated. wouldn't be it possible to shorten somehow the subject line? solutions: - drop the name of the list (ie: [CentOS-announce] ) - drop the CESA reference number (ie: CESA-2006:0160 ) - or simple rearrange the subject eg into: [CentOS-announce] CentOS 3 ia64 kernel - CESA-2006:0140 Important security update for me it's totaly inrelevant the solution just move the package name somehow left. yours. just my 2c. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"

3 8

Whither LM87 sensor driver?
by Steve Snyder 22 Jan '06

22 Jan '06

From my reading of the Linux Kernel mailing list, it seems that the LM87 sensor driver made it into kernel 2.6.8. Anyone know why it is not present in the RHEL4/Centos4.2 current kernel? Thanks.

2 1

Tyan 2895 in production?
by Chris Mauritz 22 Jan '06

22 Jan '06

I stand to "inherit" some of these motherboards from another project. They seem like a nice dual socket 940 board that also supports dual core opterons, but I don't have any personal experience with them. Anyone using them in production w/CentOS 4.2? Best regards,

2 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss