Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

3 participants
34748 discussions

screen shifting
by Daniel Wright 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Hello List, I was wondering if there is a way to shift the screens in linux. I got a kvn yesterday, and have a problem when switching from computers, where the screen is slightly shifted on one of them. I have to go into the monitor configuration screen and move the screen to the right to center it on one of the computers. Then when moving back to the other computer, that screen isn't centered and have to back to the left so its centered. Is there a way to adjust this in xorg.conf so that when I switch between the computers, I don't have to switch the computers? I am running CentOS 4.1. Thanks, Dan

3 7

RE: [CentOS] Mount floppy on startup?
by Ash Christopher 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Ok, it seems I am a little off on my problem description. I can delete /media/floppy but on system restart, that directory is automagically created. I thought this would have been from my fstab entry, so I deleted both the /dev/fd0 line from my fstab, and deleted the /media/floppy directory but on bootup, both are created. -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mike McCarty Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 12:27 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Mount floppy on startup? Ash Christopher wrote: > Hi Craig, > > By default there is a noauto in the fstab. Depends on who created the fstab entry. > I first tried removing the entry for the floppy from the fstab, and upon > my next boot up the following was inserted at the end of my fstab file: > > /dev/fd0 /media/floppy auto > pamconsole,exec,noauto,managed 0 0 > This is my entry, which works under FC2 to do exactly what you want. /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy auto noauto,user,exec,kudzu 0 0 (well, I cut some space for readability) > Are you suggesting I change this to the following? So, as you can see, > the noauto is already in my fstab. Yes, I don't understand what is the problem, myself. OTOH, I don't know what the "pamconsole" does, either, nor the "managed". Perhaps "managed" is a replacement for "kudzu", but I doubt it. > Maybe I do not understand your solution properly. > > Thanks, > Ash Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that! _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

2 1

Gfs and storage
by Wayne 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Hi Guys, I have two mail servers and I want them to use gfs to share some storage device.. I don't want to buy a storage device but I have a spare server that maybe could be used. Anybody here use gfs without a proper san? Say just somehow using a server running linux? Or anybody have any thoughts? Thanks, Wayne

6 6

portsentry and proftpd RPMs available
by Troy Engel 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Just dropping a note, I've built CentOS4 friendly RPMs (as well as RHEL4 and FC4) of two of my favourite tools, PortSentry and ProFTPd: ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/ftp.falsehope.net/home/tengel/portsentry/CentOS4/ ftp://ftp.pbone.net/mirror/ftp.falsehope.net/home/tengel/proftpd/CentOS4/ PortSentry is built using the last known (RedHat 9 based) SPEC/patches from FreshRPMS, updated to apply with the latest known version 1.2. I have noticed no problems in it's operation on a production server, it's detecting portscans and dropping IPs as expected. ProFTPd has a backport of a patch applied that makes it work with the default MySQL 'old_passwords=1' setting found in RHEL4/CentOS4 default installs (proftpd bug #2644). If you don't want ProFTPd MySQL support in CentOS4, simply rebuild the SRPM without any commandline options. Both packages SRPMs should cleanly rebuild on CentOS3/RHEL3, but untested by me. -te -- Troy Engel | Systems Engineer Fluid Inc. | http://www.fluid.com

1 0

php-memcache module and Centos 3
by Alain NAKACHE 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Hi all, I need to compile the php-memcache PECL module but it needs a php 4.3.3 version. RHEL 3/Centos 3 provides only a php 4.3.2 but the symbol ' php_stream_pclose' is unknown. The compilation fail with : ext/memcache/memcache.o(.text+0x7ab):/home/alain/rpm/BUILD/php-4.3.2/ext/memcache/memcache.c:386: undefined reference to `php_stream_pclose' Then I wonder if a guru on this list managed to create a patch easily integrated in the php.src.rpm to permit the usage of php-memcache on Centos3 -- Alain

1 0

impress viewer for openoffice
by Jerry Geis 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Hi, I am attempting to find an openoffice powerpower point viewer. I found imposter but when I run my file it says "Cannot find zip signature". I though I would zip it up an try it again but that did not work either. Also I dont think there is a way from the command line to go fullscreen? not sure. Anyone know of a good power point viewer for centos? or a way to make impress startup and go into slideshow mode? Either is fine... Jerry

2 1

Re: [CentOS] OT: CentOS server with 2 GbE links to 2 GbE switches
by Jeff Stacey 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Have a look at http://linux-ip.net/html/ether-bonding.html#ether-bonding-ha You can only use one link at a time. The second nic is for fail-over. * Jeff >>> centos(a)puzzled.xs4all.nl 8/26/2005 8:36:42 AM >>> Hi all, I am trying to come up with an architecture that has some redundancy. The idea is to hook up the two GbE LAN interfaces of a CentOS server to two Gigabit Ethernet switches. In case one switch goes down, there is a redundant path (the server is redundant too). Here is the idea: ----------- | GbE | PCs ------------| switch |------------ | | ----------- | | ----------------- ----------------- ---| Workgoup Switch | | CentOS/Asterisk | | ----------------- ----------------- | | ----------- | VoIP ------------| GbE |------------ Phones | switch | ----------- How would I acomplish this? Can I use IP addresses from one IP network (say 10.0.0.0/24) to assign to the 2 LAN ports on the CentOS server and a port on each of the GbE switches and then use something like OSPF on the switches and the CentOS box to do the routing? Any other ideas? Many thanks for your suggestions. Regards, Patrick _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

2 1

RE: [CentOS] 'Many' packages installed - CentOS 4.1
by Plant, Dean 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Tim Edwards wrote: > John Hinton wrote: >> Craig White wrote: >> I don't know, I must be choosing something that's throwing the extra >> garbage in. And I know, I could write my own KS, but gee, I don't do >> it often enough for that and some machines vary, for instance some >> are nameservers some are not. A person can spend a lot of time in >> dependancy hell trying to get a clean install. If one does select >> minimal, are you presented with the custom option during install? Or >> is minimal only available at the bottom of the customization screen? >> Seems like figuring out what's missing might not be worth the effort >> to trim the fat? And maybe I'm crazy, but it seems that installing >> packages like bind during the intial install, configures itself more >> completely off the start >> versus installing the package later? >> >> A great point was made..... Custom should be Custom and should allow >> minimal within that scope. Custom doesn't even seem to have nearly >> the full package list shown, although yes, it can be argued that some >> packages simply must be installed and therefore don't need to be >> shown. Then again, maybe one of my 'other' selections is throwing X >> into the game? >> >> When CentOS finalizes their 'Server CD', perhaps a copy should be >> sent >> to RedHat!! LOL! >> >> Again, I know this is not a 'CentOS' issue. And crap... here I go >> rambling again! Sorry. > > Just to throw in my $0.02: we do minimal installs with all our RHEL > and CentOS boxes (both 3 and 4) and it really is minimal - no X, no > GUI, no KDE/GNOME or Window Managers. If you're building a server > then you know what should be on it so you can just do things like > 'yum install httpd php mysql' or whatever to get yourself going. Its > a very clean way of doing things. I do exactly the same process, minimal install, then "yum install <what-I-need-on-this-server>". I have been thinking of trying to produce a list of superfluous packages that are installed with the minimal install. Has anyone already done this so I can simply paste a "yum remove <non-required-packages>" after a minimal install to achieve a true minimal install? Dean

2 1

umask and nautilus/gnome
by Tony 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Hi, Does anyone know how to set umask such that nautilus actually obeys it? I have umask 002 added to the end of .bashrc, and if I touch a file from a gnome terminal, I correctly get -rw-rw-r--. However if I right click in a nautilus window and "create document" then "empty file" I end up with -rw------ which is obviously going to be a royal pita for group working! -- Cheers, Tony

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 6, Issue 13
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 26 Aug '05

26 Aug '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:529-01: Important CentOS 2 i386 kernel security update (John Newbigin) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:54:07 +1000 From: John Newbigin <jnewbigin(a)ict.swin.edu.au> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:529-01: Important CentOS 2 i386 kernel security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <430E925F.7010103(a)ict.swin.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:529-01 Important: kernel security update Files available: kernel-2.4.9-e.65.athlon.rpm kernel-smp-2.4.9-e.65.athlon.rpm kernel-BOOT-2.4.9-e.65.i386.rpm kernel-doc-2.4.9-e.65.i386.rpm kernel-headers-2.4.9-e.65.i386.rpm kernel-source-2.4.9-e.65.i386.rpm kernel-2.4.9-e.65.i686.rpm kernel-debug-2.4.9-e.65.i686.rpm kernel-enterprise-2.4.9-e.65.i686.rpm kernel-smp-2.4.9-e.65.i686.rpm kernel-summit-2.4.9-e.65.i686.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin Computer Systems Officer Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 6, Issue 13 **********************************************

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss