Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

3 participants
34748 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Version of php on Centros 4.1
by Todd Cary 29 Jul '05

29 Jul '05

What version of php is installed on 4.1? Todd --

2 3

centos 4 and hardware compatibility
by Powell, Don 29 Jul '05

29 Jul '05

Is centos 4 compatible with gateway 7400 server. We have some spare gateway 7400 servers with 2 intel Pentium iii (FC-PGA Socket 370) processors operating at 667 mhz. Are there any compatibility issues? Fully supported? ^^ Have a Wonderful Day ^^ Don R. Powell Systems Software Specialist II Department of Insurance Application Development & Maintenance 300 Capitol Mall, Suite 1400 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 492-3384 (916) 327-3481 FAX powelld(a)insurance.ca.gov <mailto:powelld@insurance.ca.gov>

3 2

modules.conf changes in kernel 2.6
by Robin Mordasiewicz 28 Jul '05

28 Jul '05

I used to be able to modify my modules.conf file so that certain NIC cards would load specific drivers. Has this changed in kernel 2.6 i.e. <snip /etc/modules.conf> alias eth0 e100 alias eth1 e1000 </snip> It used to be that I could reverse this order and eth0 would be the GigE card.

3 3

squirrelmail with postfix and dovecot
by Carlos Arellano 28 Jul '05

28 Jul '05

I've install squirrelmail, postfix an dovecot, i already configured squirrelmail whit conf.pl and manually, but wen i try to acces <http://myserver/webmail> http://myserver/webmail Any pages are faund, the files that make alias ara ok. What can I do Thanks. Este correo fue escaneado y se encuentra libre de virus. Este correo fue escaneado y se encuentra libre de virus.

6 12

[CentOS] New to CentOS, and wondering about application availability
by Dave Gutteridge 28 Jul '05

28 Jul '05

Centos Mailing List, Hello. I have just recently installed CentOS on my home computer, and just joined this mailing list. I have a lot of questions so I will have quite a few postings in the next few days. I was using Fedora Core 4 for a few weeks, but it was unstable and had trouble reading some of my DVD drives and other issues. So, I decided to switch to another distribution. I saw on one site that the three distros being nominated for best distribution by user's vote were Ubuntu, CentOS, and Fedora Core. I tried Ubuntu, but the installer kept failing. So I went to CentOS. Anyway, long story short, CentOS looks and feels just like Fedora (which I like), and it reads all my DVD drives normally, so I think I could be happy with it. But... When I tried to install Xine, using yum, it said it could not find it. And then I went looking for an RPM for Xine, and they're all for Red Hat or Fedora. I tried installing an RPM for Fedora anyway, reasoning that maybe they were the same in more than just looks, but no dice. As I looked around the net, it seems that applications all seem to have specific builds for Red Hat, Fedora, a couple of Debian builds... but no CentOS. Going by the amount of available information and support, Fedora is the primary Linux distribution, and CentOS hardly even exists. Can't I have it all? Stability, the ability to read my DVD drives, *and* a variety of applications? Is there any kind of resource for instructions on installing CentOS like there is this one for Fedora: http://stanton-finley.net/fedora_core_4_installation_notes.html Dave

18 46

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 5, Issue 13
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 28 Jul '05

28 Jul '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:603-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 dhcpcd security update (John Newbigin) 2. CESA-2005:612 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 kdelibs - security update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2005:612 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 kdelibs - security update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:57:30 +1000 From: John Newbigin <jnewbigin(a)ict.swin.edu.au> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:603-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 dhcpcd security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <42E8115A.1090908(a)ict.swin.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded to the centos mirror: RHSA-2005:603-01 Moderate: dhcpcd security update Files available: dhcpcd-1.3.20pl0-2.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin Computer Systems Officer Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.ict.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:01:33 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:612 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 kdelibs - security update To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <1122505293.15761.14.camel(a)myth.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2005:612 kdelibs security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-612.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: kdelibs-3.3.1-3.11.i386.rpm kdelibs-devel-3.3.1-3.11.i386.rpm src: kdelibs-3.3.1-3.11.src.rpm

1 0

what the best ? apt-get? yum or urpmi ?
by Security 28 Jul '05

28 Jul '05

Hello, I must make a choice concerning the use of a tool used to update rpms: yum, urpmi or apt-get. Personally, I use urpmi every day, without real problems (the dependences, even those of Perl are very well managed), the "hdlist" can be used in several forms , it contains a lot of funtions but, it is not integrated into up2date and does not have a graphic interface that fits Centos3 without break all depedencies. There are also the two others: yum and apt-get. Because Centos uses yum, I would like to have a feedback: speed of calculations for the dependences, comparative with apt-get. There are already opinions on the question (yum is easy to install, more flexible, but less powerful. and to connect itself itself to the sources + download the lists of packages even if no update is avaible...... grrr). So, Wthat need I to use for a Centos-like ditribution? (It's to intagrate the tool on Gralinux final) apt-get + synaptic?? yum+yumi???urpmi in command line only ??? Thanks :) jean-seb

3 4

vsftpd and Kickstart
by Ken Leyba 28 Jul '05

28 Jul '05

I'm trying to setup a kickstart server that will use ftp. I created a user account and put the ISO images in /home/centos. I created a directory /home/centos/disc1 and mounted the first ISO image there. When I try to do the ftp install I keep getting an error "Unable to retrieve ftp://my.ftpserver.com//home/centos/disc1/CentOS/base/netstg2.img" I tried different versions of the ftp directory but the error above is using /home/centos/disc1. If I manually ftp into the machine and cd to /home/centos/disc1/CentOS/base/ I can get netstg2.img. However if I do it like this it won't work: ftp> get /home/centos/disc1/CentOS/base/netstg2.img local: ./home/centos/disc1/CentOS/base/netstg2.img remote: /home/centos/disc1/CentOS/base/netstg2.img local: ./home/centos/disc1/CentOS/base/netstg2.img: No such file or directory ftp> pwd 257 "/home/centos" So, I don't know if vsftpd isn't configured correctly or if I'm not doing something right with the kickstart install. I haven't created a kickstart file yet or mounted the other CD's, I just want to get the install part working first. Ken -- Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -Pablo Picasso

1 0

Re: 4g/4g
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 28 Jul '05

28 Jul '05

From: "Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith(a)ieee.org>" > Hmmm, maybe I haven't built from a stock kernel in a long time. ;-> > All I know is that I've seen it in several other distros. I thought the > whole purpose of the 4Gi/4Gi model was to give a support/performance > point between the 1Gi/3Gi and full 64GiB model. Okay, I did some elementary research and it appears it was never adopted in the stock 2.4 kernel. Although 2.6 seems to have been designed for it -- although I see the issues you were talking about, largely when user >2GiB. I'd be interested in finding out if they have the same issues with the 64GiB mode and formal PAE36 paging. Anyhoo, my apologies on that _poor_ assumption. Given my lack of exposure to stock kernels, I should have kept my mouth shut. I don't know why I didn't put 2-2 together. But it should be noted that it's no longer a Red Hat-only thing. I've seen several non-Red Hat (or long-gone Red Hat forked) distros who are using it. I should have made my responses in that context. Again, my apologies for that. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

2 1

Re: Using CentOS as a file server on a win2K domain
by Jeff Stacey 27 Jul '05

27 Jul '05

You can configure samba to be a domain member server http://ca.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/domain-member.htm… you don't have to use ldap just kerberos Jeff >>> ugob(a)camo-route.com 7/27/2005 1:31 PM >>> Carlos Arellano wrote: > Use samba is easy think to do.. http://us4.samba.org/samba/ I know, but I don't want to manage users on 2 servers... What helps with that? Winbind? -- Ugo -> Please don't send a copy of your reply by e-mail. I read the list. -> Please avoid top-posting, long signatures and HTML, and cut the irrelevant parts in your replies. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss