Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

5 participants
34752 discussions

Trying to compile, incompatible libraries? Cento4
by Edward Croft 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

I get the errors: zip4_lnx.a(generic.o)(.text+0xb16): more undefined references to `__ctype_b' follow zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_close(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_catch_error(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_addr(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol_skip(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_loaded(a)GLIBC_2.1' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_open(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_signal_error(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_global_scope(a)GLIBC_2.0' zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol_skip(a)GLIBC_2.0' I have the compatibility libraries installed. I have tried using gcc296, gcc, and gcc4 and still get the message. The library,libdl.so.2 is in /lib with a symlink to /usr/lib/libdl.so Using CentOS 4.0. -- If the sane say the insane are insane, What if the sane are insane? Would that make the insane sane? Explains a lot in Washington! --E. Croft

3 6

CESA-2005:587 missing devhelp src.rpm
by Matthew Miller 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

> src: > devhelp-0.9.2-2.4.6.src.rpm > mozilla-1.7.10-1.4.1.centos4.src.rpm The mozilla src.rpm is there, but the devhelp one seems to be missing from the mirrors.... -- Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 76 degrees Fahrenheit.

1 1

Install Problems Centos 4.1
by Peter Farrow 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

Dear All, I have a K8S-MX Asus Athlon 64 Motherboard with a 754 pin 3000+ CPU, which I cam trying to install 4.1 Centos 64 bit. The problem seems to arise when installing onto Mirrored disks, I have noticed that from Centos 4 onwards it tries to rebuild the arrays as it installs which slows the whole process right down across all platforms I have tried it on. In addition, the install process bails out at random times with random errors eg. "Disk Full", "error loading this package or that package", Error reading DVD etc... now I have burnt several copies of the DVD, tested them fully, tried installing from CD, even changed the hardware to a twin Opteron system, changed the RAM changed this disks and tried everything but it still seems really touch and go as to wether the install will complete. I haven't managed it yet on the Asus platform it took about 12 goes on the opteron platform. Yet Centos 3.4 installs no problem. Finally the last straw was the boot loader problem with occurs either immediately after reboot after install or on one of the boots soon after, and I have to do this to fix it: -------------------------------------- grub> root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0xfd grub> setup (hd0) Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes Running "embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd0)"... 16 sectors are embedded. succeeded Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd0) (hd0)1+16 p (hd0,0)/boot/grub/stage2 /boot/grub/grub.conf"... succeeded Done. grub> root (hd1,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0xfd grub> setup (hd1) Checking if "/boot/grub/stage1" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/stage2" exists... yes Checking if "/boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5" exists... yes Running "embed /boot/grub/e2fs_stage1_5 (hd1)"... 16 sectors are embedded. succeeded Running "install /boot/grub/stage1 (hd1) (hd1)1+16 p (hd1,0)/boot/grub/stage2 /boot/grub/grub.conf"... succeeded Done. grub> quit ------------------ Has anyone else seen these tedious unpredicatble errors on install that seems to have arrived with version 4 onwards...? Regards Pete

7 13

yum gives HTTP Error 404: Not Found
by Ulrik S. Kofod 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

Is it just me that get this error or is the httpd-devel file not publiched yet? # yum -y update Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: CentOS-3 - Addons Server: CentOS-3 - Base Server: CentOS-3 - Extras Server: CentOS-3 - Updates Finding updated packages Downloading needed headers Resolving dependencies Dependencies resolved I will do the following: [update: httpd-devel 2.0.46-46.2.ent.i386] [update: httpd 2.0.46-46.2.ent.i386] [update: mod_ssl 1:2.0.46-46.2.ent.i386] Downloading Packages Getting httpd-devel-2.0.46-46.2.ent.i386.rpm retrygrab() failed for: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/updates/i386//RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-46.… Executing failover method failover: out of servers to try Error getting file http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3/updates/i386//RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-46.… [Errno 4] IOError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by OpenProtect(http://www.openprotect.com), and is believed to be clean.

3 2

RAID 5 vs. RAID 10
by Andrew Vong 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

Hi, I am looking into purchasing a new server. This server will be mission-critical. I have read and somewhat understood the theories behind RAIDs 0, 1, 5, 10 & JBOD. However, I would like to get some feedback from those who have experience in implementing and recovering from a HDD failure using RAID. Hardware specs include:- Dual Xeon 3.2 GHz 2 GB RAM I would like to implement hardware RAID but am unsure as to which would be most suitable for my needs. Any advice is appreciated. Option 1 - RAID 5 (3 hdd's) + 1 hot spare Option 2 - RAID 10 (4 hdd's) + 1 "cold" spare (in the shelf) Questions I have :- 1) When should RAID 5 be implemented? 2) When should RAID 10 be implemented? 3) Is RAID 5 with a hot spare safer than RAID 10 with a "cold" spare? 4) Is it possible to configure RAID 10 to have a hot spare? 5) Should one of the HDDs fail, a hot spare w kick-in immediately and begin rebuilding. As I am planning to put in 300 GB HDDs, how long would this take on a RAID 5 vs. RAID 10? 6) Will there be a degradation in performance for users on the system (RAID 5 vs. RAID 10)? 7) What are the disadvantages of using RAID 5 vs. RAID 10? Thanks in advance for answering my questions. Best Regards, Andrew

3 4

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 5, Issue 11
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:587 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) mozilla - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 2. CentOS-4.1 s390(x) Release Announcement (Pasi Pirhonen) 3. CESA-2005:587-01: Important CentOS 2 i386 mozilla security update (John Newbigin) 4. CESA-2005:582 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 httpd - security update (Tru Huynh) 5. CESA-2005:582 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 httpd - security update (Tru Huynh) 6. CESA-2005:640 Important CentOS 3 i386 fetchmail - security update (Tru Huynh) 7. CESA-2005:640 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 fetchmail - security update (Tru Huynh) 8. CESA-2005:640 Important CentOS 4 i386 fetchmail - security update (Johnny Hughes) 9. CESA-2005:640 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 fetchmail - security update (Johnny Hughes) 10. CESA-2005:582 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 httpd - security update (Johnny Hughes) 11. CESA-2005:582 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 httpd - security update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:59:30 +0300 From: Pasi Pirhonen <upi(a)papat.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:587 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) mozilla - security update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20050724125930.GF1134(a)core.upi.iki.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:587 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-587.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-chat-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-devel-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-dom-inspector-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-js-debugger-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-mail-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-nspr-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-nspr-devel-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-nss-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/mozilla-nss-devel-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-chat-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-devel-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-dom-inspector-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-js-debugger-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-mail-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-nspr-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-nspr-devel-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-nss-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm updates/s390x/RPMS/mozilla-nss-devel-1.7.10-1.1.3.1.centos3.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi(a)iki.fi - http://iki.fi/upi/

1 0

CentOS 4 snag with htaccess
by John Hinton 25 Jul '05

25 Jul '05

I'm hitting a snag with htaccess. Have created .htaccess and .htpasswd files, set up apache directory options just like always... the exact same setup works fine on CentOS 3, but I can't seem to get it to authenticate on CentOS 4? Am I just being blind stupid (as in not seeing something 'exactly the same') or is there something different I'm missing? I have selinux running in warn mode I think it was, but not fully enabled. Best, John Hinton

3 5

Open Office 1.9.x
by Mark Jarvis 24 Jul '05

24 Jul '05

Having used Open Office 1.9.x on the XP side of my box, I decided to install it on the CentOS side. (The default OO was 1.1.2, for heaven's sake!) I downloaded the Linux 386 version from the OO site. I immediately ran into problems-- 1) The installation instructions were for OO 1.x. 2) The download appears to be source RPMs. Although I've used UNIX & Linux for over 15 years, there are still some empty spots in my toolbox--and dealing with RPMs in one of them. (YUM is SO much nicer!) Has anyone added OO1.9.113 to CentOS? Where can I find info on what I need to do to get OO1.9.x added to my CentOS installation? Any help will be much appreciated! -mj-

9 12

Centos 4.1, ClamScan and Kernel Leaks
by Bill Diamond 24 Jul '05

24 Jul '05

I recently installed ClamAV on my Centos 4.1 system (AMD Athlon 64 3500 +, 1GB RAM). I'm using postfix, with fetchmail to retrieve email from remote ISP accounts and processing emai through a spamfilter plugin, which is a shell script that passes inbounds through clamscan and spamassassin before handing it off to a local procmail for processing and delivery. Pror to installing ClamAV, the system stayed up for months at a time. Since then, I'm seeing a lot of system freezes and crashes, at least once per day. I'm also seeing a fair number of complaints in the boot log about ACPI errors and the like. I'm on kernel 2.6.9-11.EL. In the messages log, I can see where just prior to the system freeze, there are a sequence of messages regarding the system's inability to reset the USB adapter, of which no devices are attached. Almost immediately after, I see errors with the system gets error messages on read capacity on the hard drives. After this appears to reset itself, I start seeing kernel messages about available memory dropping from 1GB to less than 1MB. Any suggestions/advice? Thanks, Bill -- Bill Diamond <bill(a)billdiamond.com>

1 0

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 5, Issue 10
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 24 Jul '05

24 Jul '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2005:586 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox - security update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CESA-2005:586 Important CentOS 4 i386 firefox - security update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2005:378 Low CentOS 3 x86_64 cpio - security update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CESA-2005:378 Low CentOS 3 i386 cpio - security update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CESA-2005:378 Low CentOS 4 i386 cpio - security update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2005:378 Low CentOS 4 x86_64 cpio - security update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2005:584 Important CentOS 4 i386 zlib - security update (Johnny Hughes) 8. CESA-2005:584 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 zlib - security update (Johnny Hughes) 9. CESA-2005:601 Important CentOS 4 i386 thunderbird - security update (Johnny Hughes) 10. CESA-2005:601 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 thunderbird - security update (Johnny Hughes) 11. CESA-2005:639 Critical CentOS 4 i386 kdenetwork - security update (Johnny Hughes) 12. CESA-2005:639 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 kdenetwork - security update (Johnny Hughes) 13. CEBA-2005:0723-001 Low CentOS 4 i386 up2date/rhn-applet bugfix announcement (Johnny Hughes) 14. CEBA-2005:0723-001 Low CentOS 4 x86_64 up2date/rhn-applet bugfix announcement (Johnny Hughes) 15. CESA-2005:587 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 mozilla - security update (Johnny Hughes) 16. CESA-2005:587 Important CentOS 4 i386 mozilla - security update (Johnny Hughes) 17. CESA-2005:587 Important CentOS 3 ia64 mozilla - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 18. CESA-2005:587 Important CentOS 3 i386 mozilla - security update (Tru Huynh) 19. CESA-2005:587 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 mozilla - security update (Tru Huynh) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 07:26:55 -0500 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2005:586 Important CentOS 4 x86_64 firefox - security update To: CentOS-Announce <centos-announce(a)centos.org> Message-ID: <1122121615.14164.17.camel(a)myth.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:586 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-586.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.x86_64.rpm src: firefox-1.0.6-1.4.1.src.rpm

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss