Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

3 participants
34748 discussions

RE: [CentOS] named server
by Marc Powell 18 May '05

18 May '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Lee Parmeter > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 11:48 AM > To: centos(a)centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] named server > > I started the named server on CentOS and it seems to > resolve DNS request OK, but it does not seem to retain the > info for very long. From what I can tell using "dig", a > domain's ip address is retained for less than 12 hours. So > in the morning, it takes 4+ seconds to resolve again the > first time. Is there an adjustment somewhere for this or is > the caching named support not enabled by default? Bind will use the Time To Live as configured by the owner of the domain name. There are other proxy DNS applications that allow you to override those values but I do not believe you can do so with bind. > Also, I thought it would be faster if I set named to use my > ISP's named server as the first choice. Where do I set this > up, in root.hints? http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:OFlpPzQRRcUJ:www.rhce2b.com/clublin ux/RHCE-19.shtml+bind+forwarders&hl=en 19.3 Caching Only Name Servers 1. Not authoritative for any zone. 2. Uses DNS root servers or another name server known as a forwarder to resolve DNS queries. 3. To create a Forwarding Name Server, put the following line in the "options" section of the /etc/named.conf file: forwarders { 192.168.1.20; }; # replace with your upstream nameserver 4. If you want BIND to only use it's forwarders to resolve hosts and not the root name servers, put the following line in the "options" section of the /etc/named.conf file: forward only; The "forwarders" option specifies which DNS or DNS servers queries should be forwarded to for resolution. > Anyone who knows more about "named" please feel free to > comment! Google knows a lot. =) -- Marc

3 2

CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 3, Issue 8
by centos-announce-request＠centos.org 18 May '05

18 May '05

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce(a)centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request(a)centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner(a)centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEBA-2005:469 BUG fix CentOS 3 x86_64 openoffice.org - bug fix update (Tru Huynh) 2. CEBA-2005:469 BUG fix CentOS 3 i386 openoffice.org - bug fix update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2005:371-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 ncpfs security update (John Newbigin) 4. CESA-2005:408 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 cyrus-imapd - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 5. CESA-2005:393 Important CentOS 4 ia64 kdelibs - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2005:408 Moderate CentOS 4 i386 and x86_64 cyrus-imapd - security update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2005:393 Important CentOS 4 i386 and X86_64 kdelibs - security update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 23:33:28 +0200 From: Tru Huynh <tru(a)centos.org> Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2005:469 BUG fix CentOS 3 x86_64 openoffice.org - bug fix update To: centos-announce(a)centos.org Message-ID: <20050517213328.GA30010(a)sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:469 openoffice.org bug fix update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-469.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/openoffice.org-1.1.2-24.2.1.EL3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/openoffice.org-i18n-1.1.2-24.2.1.EL3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/openoffice.org-libs-1.1.2-24.2.1.EL3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/openoffice.org-1.1.2-24.2.1.EL3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update openoffice.org\* Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B

1 0

caci problem in CentOS-4
by Mark Quitoriano 18 May '05

18 May '05

i installed cacti following the INSTALL file but if i try to view cacti url it shows this error: Warning: mb_ereg_replace(): mbregex compile err: premature end of regular expression in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 43 Warning: mb_ereg_replace(): mbregex compile err: premature end of regular expression in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 44 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php:43) in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 67 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php:43) in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 68 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php:43) in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 69 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php:43) in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 70 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php:43) in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php:43) in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 74 Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php:43) in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 74 Warning: main(/adodb/adodb.inc.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 103 Warning: main(): Failed opening '/adodb/adodb.inc.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/share/pear') in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 103 Warning: main(/database.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 104 Warning: main(): Failed opening '/database.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/share/pear') in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 104 Warning: main(/functions.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 105 Warning: main(): Failed opening '/functions.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/share/pear') in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 105 Fatal error: Call to undefined function: db_connect_real() in /var/www/html/cacti/include/config.php on line 111 i'm not sure if it's cacti or php error anyone encountered the same problem? -- Regards, Mark Quitoriano, CCNA http://www.atamanetworks.com

1 0

named server
by Lee Parmeter 18 May '05

18 May '05

I started the named server on CentOS and it seems to resolve DNS request OK, but it does not seem to retain the info for very long. From what I can tell using "dig", a domain's ip address is retained for less than 12 hours. So in the morning, it takes 4+ seconds to resolve again the first time. Is there an adjustment somewhere for this or is the caching named support not enabled by default? Also, I thought it would be faster if I set named to use my ISP's named server as the first choice. Where do I set this up, in root.hints? Anyone who knows more about "named" please feel free to comment! Thanks! Lee Yahoo! Mail Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html

3 5

Trouble mounting a second drive
by Richard Kurth 18 May '05

18 May '05

I am tying to mount a second hard drive to my server with CentOS installed on the primary hard drive. I need to get some data off of the drive. It also has Linux installed on it. It was the primary hard drive on the system it was installed on. When I set it up as the second disk it will not boot the drive because it has /boot partition on it. So it conflicts with the /boot partition on the primary drive. How can I boot up the computer so it sees this drive so I can move the data across to the primary drive. -- Best regards, Richard mailto:rdkurth@starband.net

2 3

check permissions of all my files!
by israel.garcia＠cimex.com.cu 18 May '05

18 May '05

List, How can I check the permissions of all the files of my CentOS server? I'm looking for some kind of report with this information.. Is there some command? Some tool? Regards, Israel

3 4

Re: [CentOS] check permissions of all my files!
by Bogdan Nicolescu 18 May '05

18 May '05

cd / ls -laR Regards Bogdan --- israel.garcia(a)cimex.com.cu wrote: > List, How can I check the permissions of all the > files of my CentOS > server? > I'm looking for some kind of report with this > information.. > Is there some command? Some tool? > > Regards, > Israel > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS(a)centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

1 0

Re: Hardware RAID Controller
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 17 May '05

17 May '05

From: Lee W <centos-list(a)unassemble.co.uk> > Has anyone had any experience of using the Promise FastTrak SX4000 or > SuperTrak SX6000 IDE RAID Controllers under Centos (if it matters I'm > using version 4). I've seen it listed on linuxcompatible.org as working > but would prefer to find out any first-hand experince before I buy. Avoid the FastTraks. Most are FRAID (Fake/Free RAID), 100% software with 0% GPL drivers. The SuperTraks are a "true hardware" microcontroller+DRAM solution with GPL drivers. Unfortunately, they use mega-yesteryear i960 microcontrollers not able to keep up with today's drives. When you want ATA and RAID-5, I recommend the LSI Logic with "x" in the product model to indicate XScale (superscalar StrongARM) microcontrollers. > If not, can anyone suggest another make of RAID Controller that will > support upto 4 IDE RAIDS (preferably with support for RAID 5). And is > also available in the UK. Is there any consideration driving RAID-5? For a majority of applications, RAID-0+1 tends to be better. I prefer 3Ware Escalade 7506/8506 series cards for RAID-0+1. They use a 64-bit ASIC and SRAM (static RAM). The 9500S series is still maturing, although they should eventually show outstanding performance. They add a large amount of DRAM to the existing ASIC+SRAM approach of the earlier Escalades. -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

6 8

data overrun on SCSI drive
by Bowie Bailey 17 May '05

17 May '05

I have a system that I just installed with CentOS 4.0. It is an HP NetServer E 60 with dual CPUs and 1G RAM. There is an Adaptec AIC-7895 built into the motherboard. On bootup, I get this: (scsi0:A:1): 11.626MB/s transfers (5.813MHz, offset 8, 16bit) (scsi0:A:1:0): data overrun detected in Data-in phase. Tag == 0x2. (scsi0:A:1:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 255. NumSGs = 1. sg[0] - Addr 0x03ace40 : Length 255 (scsi0:A:1:0): data overrun detected in Data-in phase. Tag == 0x3. (scsi0:A:1:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 255. NumSGs = 1. sg[0] - Addr 0x03ace40 : Length 255 (scsi0:A:1:0): data overrun detected in Data-in phase. Tag == 0x2. (scsi0:A:1:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 255. NumSGs = 1. sg[0] - Addr 0x03ace40 : Length 255 scsi scan: 255 byte inquiry failed with code 458752. Consider BLIST_INQUIRY_36 for this device Vendor: WDIGTL Model: WDE18300 ULTRA2 Rev: 1.30 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 scsi0:A:1:0: Tagged Queuing enabled. Depth 4 SCSI device sdb: 35761710 512-byte hdwr sectors (18310 MB) SCSI device sdb: drive cache: write back sdb: sdb1 Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi0, channel 0, id 1, lun 0 How do I use BLIST_INQUIRY_36? Is there anything else I can try to fix this error? Also, is there a searchable archive for this list? Bowie

1 0

cashing named server
by Lee Parmeter 17 May '05

17 May '05

I started the named server on CentOS and it seems to resolve DNS request OK, but it does not seem to retain the info for very long. From what I can tell using "dig", a domain's ip address is retained for less than 12 hours. So in the morning, it takes 4+ seconds to resolve again the first time. Is there an adjustment somewhere for this or is the caching named support not enabled by default? Also, I thought it would be faster if I set named to use my ISP's named server as the first choice. Where do I set this up, in root.hints? Anyone who knows more about "named" please feel free to comment! Thanks! Lee __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

3 4

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss