Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

5 participants
34752 discussions

Removing custom kernels?
by Preston Crawford 09 May '05

09 May '05

Is this possible. I did my first one yesterday in order to get my iPod mini to work with the EL kernel. It worked well. Everything went smoothly, but I don't like what I named it. So I'd like to take one more shot at it. If I do, is there a way to remove the old one cleanly? Modules and everything. Also, if do recompile the kernel again, do I need fresh source, or can I just do a make clean, rename the setting in the Makefile for the name, then go through all the usual steps. Thanks, Preston

4 3

Dell Powervault 132T tape library
by Carlos Scott 09 May '05

09 May '05

Hello all. I'm struggling to get Centos 4 to recognize my Dell Powervaul 132T tape changer. The system doesnt create a device node for it. [root@orion scotty]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi Attached devices: Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 06 Lun: 00 Vendor: SEAGATE Model: DAT DAT72-052 Rev: A060 Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03 Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00 Vendor: IBM Model: ULTRIUM-TD2 Rev: 37RH Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03 Host: scsi3 Channel: 01 Id: 06 Lun: 00 Vendor: PE/PV Model: 1x8 SCSI BP Rev: 1.1 Type: Processor ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Host: scsi3 Channel: 02 Id: 00 Lun: 00 Vendor: MegaRAID Model: LD0 RAID5 39760R Rev: 350O Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 It does recognize the tape device as sg1, but not the changer [root@orion scotty]# /usr/sbin/mtx -f /dev/sg1 inquiry Product Type: Tape Drive Vendor ID: 'IBM ' Product ID: 'ULTRIUM-TD2 ' Revision: '37RH' Attached Changer: No I corrected the typo in the /etc/hotplug/scsi.agent file: --> 8) TYPE=changer ; MOUDLE=sg ;; corrected to --> 8) TYPE=changer ; MODULE=sg ;; and also added the following line to /etc/modprobe.conf options scsi_mod max_luns=128 I rebuilt the initrd but it still doest work. If anyone could point me in the right direction i'd be really thankfull Cheers thanks in advance. NOTA CONFIDENCIAL: La información contenida en este E-mail es confidencial y sólo puede ser utilizada por la persona o la compañía a la cual está dirigido y/o por el emisor. Si no es el receptor autorizado, cualquier retención, difusión, distribución o copia de este mensaje es prohibida y será sancionada por la ley. Si por error recibe este mensaje, favor reenviarlo y borrar el mensaje recibido inmediatamente. CONFIDENTIAL NOTE: The information in this E-mail is intended to be confidential and only for use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and/or the issuer. If you are not the intended recipient, any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited and sanctioned by law. If you receive this message by error, please immediately send it back and delete the message received. CORREO DE USO INSTITUCIONAL MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA

1 0

RE: [CentOS] Centos 4 / Postfix / SMTP - SORTED
by Marc Powell 09 May '05

09 May '05

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Nigel Kendrick > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 8:05 AM > To: 'CentOS mailing list' > Subject: RE: [CentOS] Centos 4 / Postfix / SMTP - SORTED > > OHMYGOD I am a grade 1 pillock: > > All sites hosting our mail servers have Zen as their ISP but where I am > now > it's using BT - so I guess it's not a good idea to try and use Zen's > server > from a BT account - mind you some kind of error return when I tried to > connect might have helped! Most mail servers will return a '550 Relaying not allowed' error message. If Zen doesn't do that then it's a configuration decision on their part. -- Marc

1 0

mailscanner on centos4
by Francois Caen 09 May '05

09 May '05

Anyone here running mailscanner on CentOS4? I'm using the latest MS with sendmail on x86_64 dual-Xeon. Messages seem to vanish after arriving, not even showing in mqueue.in . Anyone else with a similar setup, working or not? Thanks, Francois Caen

3 4

centos4+opengroupware
by Mark Quitoriano 09 May '05

09 May '05

anyone implemented opengroupware with centos? hows the perforamance? and i know there's a repo(apt-get) for opengroupware anyone know it? -- Regards, Mark Quitoriano, CCNA http://www.atamanetworks.com

1 0

Time is Fleeting: CentOS 4 question
by Bill Diamond 09 May '05

09 May '05

I have recently built a new server using CentOS4. I've found one major oddity: time resolution is completely whacked. I'm not using an external time source nor am I relying on NTP for time resolution. For some reason, time on this server moves forward at a far more rapid rate. Right now, all my other systems show Sunday May 8, 3:19 pm. The CentOS server thinks its Monday May 9, 3:54 pm. I just reset it about four hours ago to the correct time. I'm using an inexpensive eMachines T6212 AMD Athon 64 processor and 1 GB RAM. Can anyone suggest a reason why this server thinks it's 25 hours in the future and growing more distant with each minute? Thanks, Bill -- Bill Diamond <bill(a)billdiamond.com>

5 4

Re: passwordless ssh
by rado 08 May '05

08 May '05

> > > > > does anyone know of anything specific that Centos is doing here? or what > > can be my problem? > > Try making sure that the permissions for the /root/.ssh directory is > 700, and the permissions on the /root/.ssh/authorized_keys is 600. > > Also try looking at your logs if that doesn't help. Whenever I've had > any problem like you're describing, it was being logged, which in turn > clued me in on the problem. > > -Ryan > Nope. > > > or what can be my problem? > > Check your permissions on both the client and server. > > chmod -R 0700 ~/.ssh > > -- > Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez(a)ivazquez.net> > http://centos.ivazquez.net/ > Thx Ryan and Ignacio you guys were so right w/your replies...I just kept concentrating on permissions.. I would make a change and right away do: chmod -R 700 /root/.ssh I did not do chmod 600 /root/.ssh/authorized_keys as it didn't seem to need be...for sure I would have if I couldn't get it working. I was aware that permissions were a major player here but thought I had them right but didn't... well, sure appreciate your replies john rose -- rado <rado(a)rivers-bend.com>

2 1

hardware problem trust usb2.0 pci card
by Michel Daggelinckx 08 May '05

08 May '05

after installing this card centos 3.4 detected and configured it ok. i'm unable to use any device on the card. tryed it with creative thumbdrive (mass storage device) an samsung usb2 dvd writer. suspecting the card to be defective i replaced it but didn't help centos detected the via chipset alright and loaded the modules. any ideas?

1 0

Gnome-terminal buffer problems?
by Preston Crawford 08 May '05

08 May '05

Is anyone else having these. Using like slrn and ncftp I'm running into situations where scrolling too far down the buffer doesn't seem to roll correctly (for lack of a better term). Has anyone else encountered this and is there a fix? Preston

2 1

newer ZLIB and ZLIB-DEVEL
by Robert Hanson 08 May '05

08 May '05

Greetings, I have need of a newer ZLIB and/or maybe the ZLIB-DEVEL. I need 1.2.2 or later and was told to go to www.zlib.net On that site, it mentions... zlib for Linux, both shared and static plus headers (RPM format, many architectures) so what I am wondering is this, is there a new ZLIB coming down the "upstream" pipe now or quickly? if there a specific YUM command to snag from another repository(ies) that you and the developers trust? if not, which one should I grab from www.zlib.net that will not cause me any future problems with "yum" or any other situations etc? TIA and regards, - rh

3 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss