Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

3 participants
34748 discussions

Start a nNew thread

removing gnome integration for firefox
by centos-mntr 05 May '05

05 May '05

Does anybody know how to remove gnome integration for firefox? I want to use native firefox open save dialog.

5 8

Yum Amavisd Update fails Digest::MD5 error
by Leonard Isham 05 May '05

05 May '05

Error message is: Starting Mail Virus Scanner (amavisd): Digest::MD5 version 2.22 required--this is only version 2.20 at... Googled for Digest::MD5 and found v2.33 (http://search.cpan.org/~gaas/Digest-MD5-2.33/MD5.pm) Downloaded it untared it perl ./Makefile.PL ...error missing Digest::Base Download from CPAN perl ./Makefile.PL make make test make install Back to Digest::MD5 perl ./Makefile.PL Perl's config says that U32 access must be aligned. Writing Makefile for Digest::MD5 make Makefile:85: *** missing separator. Stop. google information about LANG environment variable... LANG=en_US export LANG error... LANG=C export LANG error... LANG=en_US LANGVAR=en_US export LANG export LANGVAR perl ./Makefile.PL Perl's config says that U32 access must be aligned. Writing Makefile for Digest::MD5 make gcc -c -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DTHREADS_HAVE_PIDS -DDEBUGGING -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/usr/include/gdbm -O2 -g -pipe -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -DVERSION=\"2.33\" -DXS_VERSION=\"2.33\" -fPIC "-I/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi/CORE" -DU32_ALIGNMENT_REQUIRED MD5.c /bin/sh: line 1: gcc: command not found make: *** [MD5.o] Error 127 Any Ideas? -- Leonard Isham, CISSP Ostendo non ostento.

4 6

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4 - problem with remote X application
by C.M. Connelly 05 May '05

05 May '05

"JH" == Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists(a)hughesjr.com> JH> It is a feature ... really, it is (according to RH) :). JH> Here is a quote from the RH mailing list: RHML> I think by default X11Forwading is now disabled in RHML> SSH. You can either use 'ssh -X' or change it in your RHML> /etc/ssh/ssh_config. I have the following in mine: RHML> ForwardX11 yes RHML> ForwardX11Trusted yes JH> That should make it work the way you expect. Cool, cool, cool. This problem burned me a week or so ago. I figured out the ForwardX11 change, but I was too busy with the end of the semester to look into it any more than that, so never had a clue about ForwardX11Trusted. Luckily, the problem didn't seem to affect my Mac, so I've been using that as my main system. Until the start of this week, when I started having the same problems with X on my Mac after upgrading to Tiger, which was a pretty big clue, but I still wasn't sure exactly where the problem was. Johnny probably should have stressed that you need to add the ForwardX11 and ForwardX11Trusted keys on your client machine (the machine your X server is running on). Knowing about the -Y flag is also a Good Thing. Thanks! Claire -- *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Claire Connelly cmc(a)math.hmc.edu Systems Administrator (909) 621-8754 Department of Mathematics Harvey Mudd College *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

1 0

Running CentOS on very old hardware
by Alfred von Campe 05 May '05

05 May '05

A friend has an old Pentium-133 laptop with 32MB of memory and a 1.3 GB hard disk that he wants to use as a web server for a very small community. Will CentOS (or any other RHEL derived distribution for that matter) install and run with acceptable performance on such a system, or will a specialized distribution like Damn Small Linux be a better choice? In this case, disk space is not a big concern so getting the smallest footprint is not a high priority. Alfred

7 7

Re: [CentOS] Running CentOS on very old hardware
by Bryan J. Smith <b.j.smith＠ieee.org> 04 May '05

04 May '05

Pre-i686 (PPro-P4, K6/Athlon, Cyrix M2/C3, WinChip2?) architectures take issue some applications. E.g., Red Hat, among other distros, have not bothered with pre-i686 NPTL support. There are better distros for i486 (K5, Cyrix Mx/M1, WinChip) or i586 (exactly Pentium-only) architectures than anything Fedora Core based (RHEL), SuSE Linux based (SLES/NOES), Mandrake Linux or similarly based. Although Cobind Linux is supposedly a rebuild of Fedora for older systems. And I've found it runs XFCE pretty good on as little as 48MB. I know Alan Cox used to boast he ran Fedora Core 2 (same core/packages as RHEL4) with XFCE on as little as 48MB on a WinChip2 225MHz (not sure if the IDT Centaur WinChip2 was i486 or i686 ISA compatible though). -----Original Message----- From: Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic(a)pbl.ca> Sent: May 4, 2005 10:09 AM To: CentOS mailing list <centos(a)centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Running CentOS on very old hardware Alfred von Campe wrote: > A friend has an old Pentium-133 laptop with 32MB of memory and a 1.3 GB > hard disk that he wants to use as a web server for a very small > community. Will CentOS (or any other RHEL derived distribution for that > matter) install and run with acceptable performance on such a system, or > will a specialized distribution like Damn Small Linux be a better > choice? In this case, disk space is not a big concern so getting the > smallest footprint is not a high priority. Either put more memory, or go with some older distribution. CentOS 3.x might run on it, not sure what are memory requirements for it. RHEL 2.x would run even better. 64MB should be more that enough for CentOS4 as long as you use it as dedicated plain web server (no fancy stuff, no PHP, no databases, only static content). SSL would slow down things somewhat, but would be acceptable. If you install only basic packages (no X, no additional utilities, no development packages) the installation will take up somewhere around 500MB. -- Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic(a)pbl.ca> Pollard Banknote Limited Systems Administrator 1499 Buffalo Place Tel: (204) 474-2323 ext 276 Winnipeg, MB R3T 1L7 _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org

2 1

ext3 writeback mode for root parition
by Douglas E. Warner 04 May '05

04 May '05

I'm trying to enable writeback mode for the root partition. However, adding the normal option "rootflags=data=writeback" to my grub.conf kernel line doesn't result in writeback mode (according to `dmesg`). Does anyone know of a way to enable this? -Doug -- Douglas E. Warner <dwarner(a)ctinetworks.com> Network Engineer CTI Networks, Inc. http://www.ctinetworks.com +1 717 975 9000

1 1

how to install R statistics package on Centos-4
by Allison Maury 04 May '05

04 May '05

Hi everyone, I'm a newbie and interested in installing the R statistics package on a Centos-4 machine using yum, if possible. From the R website, I see that I can download an rpm for rhel 4. I don't know if the equivalent exists for Centos. I did look through the list that 'yum list available' yields and didn't seem to find a package for R. Can you recommend how best to install R? Should I install the rhel 4 binary or should I compile from source? How do I use yum to install a downloaded rpm? etc. Thanks for your help, Allison

2 2

CentOS 4 - problem with remote X application
by Petr Klíma 04 May '05

04 May '05

Hello i have a problem on CentOS 4 with starting remote x application on remote CentOS 3 od Solaris 9 boxes. The problem is: When I run it from CentOS 3 it's OK form CentOS 4 I cannot find a bad word in logs ... My local machine stoping firewall [root@klima-pc ~]# service iptables stop [root@klima-pc ~]# iptables-save [root@klima-pc ~]# SELinux is OFF I am connecting by ssh with Xforwarding enabled to - Centos 3 box [09:32 root@tux:root]# gvim --sync The program 'gvim' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter)'. (Details: serial 287 error_code 5 request_code 20 minor_code 0) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) [09:33 root@tux:root]# -Solaris 9 box root@sun bin# gvim --sync Gdk-ERROR **: BadAtom (invalid Atom parameter) serial 364 error_code 5 request_code 20 minor_code 0 Gdk-ERROR **: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied) serial 365 error_code 10 request_code 102 minor_code 0 root@sun bin#

3 3

CentOS 4 Software Raid1 questions
by Lee Parmeter 04 May '05

04 May '05

I want to mirror an existing 40GB data only drive using software Raid1 on my new CentOS 4 server. The existing drive is connected to a Promise Ultra 100 TX2 controller (non-raid). I have read about mdadm and understand how to create the Raid1 on /dev/mdxx devices. However I would like to know if the existing data on the orignal 40GB drive in the system will be destroyed when I create the raid with mdadm. Also do the 2 drives after being setup with mdadm have to be reformated? Both the 40GB drives are now formated with ext3. If not, will the added 40GB drive assigned to the Raid1 atomaticly sync to the original 40GB drive. If so, what do I need to do to assure this will happend automaticly? Your comments are appreciated, as this is my first time to setup a software Raid1. Lee __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

12 37

Re: ReiserFS3 Support
by Lance Lucas 04 May '05

04 May '05

Along the lines of the recent discussion about ReiserFS support, I was wondering if it is compatible with SELinux? I know there are some file system support issues regarding it... Another random question: is there a way to get/use Disk Druid under a running installation? This would make adding new disks, RAIDs, LVM management, etc. a breeze compared to what it can be like sometimes currently. It's all there and very easy to use during the install, but I haven't found an easy way to add software raid-1 pairs w/LVM2 to a currently running installation. Regards...

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss