Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

8 participants
34745 discussions

error on 3ware controller
by Maurizio Sparesotto 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hi all, after an uprade to new kernel 2.4.21-15.0.4.EL on my server appears a lot of these messages: EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,17)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 19268224 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,17)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 19268225 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,17)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 19268226 I try to rebuild array but at the 12% appears this message 3w-xxxx: scsi2: AEN: INFO: Rebuild started: Unit #0. 3w-xxxx: scsi2: AEN: ERROR: Drive error: Port #0. 3w-xxxx: scsi2: AEN: ERROR: Rebuild failed: Unit #0. I restarted again the rebuild but 3w-xxxx: scsi2: AEN: INFO: Rebuild started: Unit #0. 3w-xxxx: scsi2: Unit #0: Command (f7545c00) timed out, resetting card. Ok, I'm a solid Rock, I try to rebuild again but at the 68% the rebuild failed again.. Of course I checked RAM and HD and all is OK, I also changed the IDE cables. HW proliant ML370 G2 wtih 2 GB RAM 1 controller 3ware escalade 7000-6 2 HD Samsung 160GB RAID1 2 SCSI seagate cheetah 18GB SW RAID1 So, is this a Kernel bug ? Thank You, Maurizio

1 0

Re: Alternative architecture CentOS 3 builds
by Rick Graves 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hey Nels, I recently (within the last couple of days) updated the FAQ with fresh, up-to-date information. What achitectures are supported? cAos x86 currently and x86_64 (AMD64) soon CentOS-2 x86 only (sorry) CentOS-3 x86 currently and x86_64 (AMD64) soon Get it from the source here: http://caosity.org/index.php?option=faq&task=viewfaq&artid=3&Itemid=5 I was told that AMD64 would be supported "soon". We could pin Greg down if you need a more specific answer. Rick --- centos-request(a)caosity.org wrote: > CentOS appears to only be available for the i386 > architecture. Are > alternative architecture rebuilds outside the scope > of the CentOS > project, or is there some other specific reason for > that? > > > Nels Lindquist <*> > Information Systems Manager > Morningstar Air Express Inc. > >

1 0

Alternative architecture CentOS 3 builds?
by Nels Lindquist 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hi there. Although RHEL 3 is available for several different architectures, CentOS appears to only be available for the i386 architecture. Are alternative architecture rebuilds outside the scope of the CentOS project, or is there some other specific reason for that? If one wanted to rebuild CentOS for, let's say the AMD64 architecture, would that be a difficult process, or is it just something that nobody's yet done? I'm currently buying an AMD64 system and I'm curious. ---- Nels Lindquist <*> Information Systems Manager Morningstar Air Express Inc.

2 1

Killing process
by Dominic Iadicicco 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hello all, I have noticed that sometimes when I have a run-a-way process, I can't kill it. Is their any special thing to do about that. I mean when kill -15 0r -9 XXXXX don't work. Any input is apperecated. Thanks all __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Messenger - Communicate in real time. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

Killing process
by Dominic Iadicicco 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hello all, I have noticed that sometimes when I have a run-a-way process, I can't kill it. Is their any special thing to do about that. I mean when kill -15 0r -9 XXXXX don't work. Any input is apperecated. Thanks all _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush

1 0

Killing process
by Dominic Iadicicco 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hello all, _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now. http://messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

Updates for Centos3
by seth vidal 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

Hi Everyone, Updates for Centos3 httpd: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-349.html updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-38.ent.centos.1.src.rpm lha: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-323.html updates/i386/RPMS/lha-1.14i-10.4.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/lha-1.14i-10.4.src.rpm rsync: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-436.html updates/i386/RPMS/rsync-2.5.7-5.3E.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/rsync-2.5.7-5.3E.src.rpm Let me know if there are any problems. To update for any of these simply run: yum update -sv

1 0

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 02 Sep '04

02 Sep '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror: RHSA-2004:436-01 Updated rsync package fixes security issue Files available: rsync-2.5.7-3.21AS.1.i386.rpm More details are available from the RedHat web site at https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh21as-errata.html The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo?]
by sophana 01 Sep '04

01 Sep '04

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Centos] is centos3.1 compatible with dag's el3 repo? Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:15:22 +0200 From: sophana <sophana78(a)yahoo.fr> To: Dag Wieers <dag(a)wieers.com> References: <412B3E8B.7020805(a)yahoo.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0408241519120.6016(a)horsea.3ti.be> Dag Wieers wrote: >Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think > > CentOS 3 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U1 > CentOS 3.1 = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 U2 > >Although I would have prefered CentOS to follow the Red Hat numbering >instead of adding confusion. Soon U3 will be released and there will >probably be a CentOS 3.2 release. Ok I understand, I thought the RHEL2.1 has existed so I also thought that RHEL 3.1 existed also. I would also have prefered strict redhat numbering: centos 3 update2 If redhat release RHEL3.1 what will be centos name? >>For example I wish to install evms from dag's repo. Is there any problem? > >No, any problem you encounter should be reported and fixed. It is >all designed to work together. (except for kernel module packages) > evms needs a set of kernel patch to be applied. Do you think I can find one already patched or I should do it myself? If I do it, would you be interested in having the evms patched rpm? (I don't know how to do a rpm, but I can try) Is there a problem that a package depends on a kernel rpm? Regards

1 0

[Fwd: Whitepaper about the new security features in RHEL3 U3]
by John Newbigin 01 Sep '04

01 Sep '04

http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/rhel/WHP0006US_Execshield.pdf -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Whitepaper about the new security features in RHEL3 U3 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:54:15 +0200 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon) <taroon-list(a)redhat.com> To: taroon-list(a)redhat.com Hi, with the beta of RHEL3U3 out for some time it should come of no suprise that U3 is comming out sometime soon. In preparation of that I wrote a whitepaper about the new security features that were added to U3: http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/rhel/WHP0006US_Execshield.pdf If anyone here has questions about this stuff please just ask... Greetings, Arjan van de Ven -- "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo Inc., 1989 -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin -- Taroon-list mailing list Taroon-list(a)redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss