Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

1 participants
34730 discussions

Moving from WhiteBox to CentOS 3.1
by Petr Klima 10 Jun '04

10 Jun '04

Hello I am leaving Whitebox because of lack of up to date sec. updates. Did any body try to "upgrade" WBEL to CentOS? Any dificulty or problems? Thanks Petr Klima

2 1

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 10 Jun '04

10 Jun '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror RHSA-2004:233-01 Updated cvs package fixes security issues RHSA-2004:234-01 Updated Ethereal packages fix security issues RHSA-2004:236-01 Updated krb5 packages available Files available: cvs-1.11.1p1-16.i386.rpm ethereal-0.10.3-0.AS21.3.i386.rpm ethereal-gnome-0.10.3-0.AS21.3.i386.rpm krb5-devel-1.2.2-27.i386.rpm krb5-libs-1.2.2-27.i386.rpm krb5-server-1.2.2-27.i386.rpm krb5-workstation-1.2.2-27.i386.rpm The easy way to make sure you are up to date with all the latest patches is to run: # yum update -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

Moving from Fedora core 1 to CentOS
by John Antrosiglio 09 Jun '04

09 Jun '04

Hi All, I know you can migrate from RH9 to CentOS but what I was wondering was if anyone has migrated from Fedora core 1 to Centos. If not, I'll moving everything, email, apache, samba, etc.. to a new CentOS machine and do a fresh install of CentOS on the current Fedora Core 1 machine. Just looking for a easier way of getting off Fedora. Thanks, John

2 1

Upgrade from RH-9 to CentOS-3.1, any issues?
by Mike 09 Jun '04

09 Jun '04

Greetings, I've got 4 Redhat-9 servers in a production environment and I don't feel like moving to RHEL. So I'm testing CentOS-3.1 now. So far so good. I'd like to get these servers moved over in the next month or so to a better "supported" OS. Are there any issues I should be aware of in upgrades these RH-9 boxes? Should I be able to just stick in the Centos-3.1 CDROM and choose upgrade? Thanks, Michael

2 3

Updated squid package fixes security vulnerability
by Lance Davis 09 Jun '04

09 Jun '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an update to squid for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-242.html refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/squid-2.5.STABLE3-6.3E.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/squid-2.5.STABLE3-6.3E.src.rpm These are available at http://mirror.centos.org/3.1/ and should be on all mirrors within a few hours. To update to the latest version 'yum update squid' should be sufficient. Lance -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAxx8mcEnkTQJeUTsRArVOAJ49J7CsvJLf6AEjNweRojk3vV/0hgCfbdYl dxrJ6iis9lTJSkSoIr761uM= =OR4S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.

1 0

Updated krb5 packages correct buffer overflow
by Lance Davis 09 Jun '04

09 Jun '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an update to krb5 for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-236.html refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-devel-1.2.7-24.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-libs-1.2.7-24.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-server-1.2.7-24.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-workstation-1.2.7-24.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/krb5-libs-1.2.7-24.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/krb5-1.2.7-24.src.rpm These are available at http://mirror.centos.org/3.1/ and should be on all mirrors within a few hours. To update to the latest version 'yum update krb5' should be sufficient. Lance -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAxx6QcEnkTQJeUTsRAji7AKCD+Ncg9MyFgZJMnlZy2646VvcnCwCggYmp Spg9W9K9874lQBKXCmYs5fU= =iNHd -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.

1 0

Updated ethereal package fixes security issues
by Lance Davis 09 Jun '04

09 Jun '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an update to ethereal for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-234.html refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/ethereal-0.10.3-0.30E.2.centos.0.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/ethereal-gnome-0.10.3-0.30E.2.centos.0.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/ethereal-0.10.3-0.30E.2.centos.0.src.rpm These are available at http://mirror.centos.org/3.1/ and should be on all mirrors within a few hours. To update to the latest version 'yum update ethereal' should be sufficient. Lance -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAxx2zcEnkTQJeUTsRAo9RAJ4jTT5ty91KHnCq4P5AaKA3X6z73gCdGFRf Rp3ySG4U3nZkQZEpdyhBM/Y= =EOfs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.

1 0

Updated cvs package fixes security issues
by Lance Davis 09 Jun '04

09 Jun '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an update to cvs for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-233.html refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/cvs-1.11.2-24.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/cvs-1.11.2-24.src.rpm These are available at http://mirror.centos.org/3.1/ and should be on all mirrors within a few hours. To update to the latest version 'yum update cvs' should be sufficient. Lance -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAxxzjcEnkTQJeUTsRAqp4AJwK/C1AOzHlqqkBfpKZmgjON8zooACeLze4 Z/mr2mfb8JLXT9J14RkiCVI= =F5Hh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.

1 0

NIC detection by anaconda
by Lauro L. A. Whately 08 Jun '04

08 Jun '04

Hello all, I'm not able to install CentOS in a motherboard with a onboard 3Com gigabit nic (3c904/Syskonnect). Although there's a device driver for the Syskonnect (sk98lin) in the linux kernel, the installation program is asking for this interface module. I tried to create a device disk, but without success. Maybe I'm missing some information about the modules detection by the installation. How could I check the modules in the iso image ? or how could I insert a new module in the iso image ? Anyone could gime me some help on this problem ? TIA, Lauro Whately.

2 1

Differences CentOS 3.1 and RedHat 9
by c.xxx＠gmx.net 08 Jun '04

08 Jun '04

Hello everybody, I would like to port a larger package to CentOS 3.1. The package has been designed for RedHat 9. Does anybody know the differences? Can anybody give me a pointer to a list of differences? This could save me a lot of work. Thanks in advance Chris

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss