Discuss

discuss@lists.centos.org

3 participants
34756 discussions

3.1 on ASUS SK8V SATA problem
by C. Linus Hicks 01 Jun '04

01 Jun '04

This is my first post to this mailing list, although I have been reading it for a while. Please forgive the length of my message. Also, great work! I'm trying to get Centos-3 running on an ASUS SK8V Opteron motherboard in a way that is useful for me. I've had some success, but now I'm stuck on a problem with the SATA driver. Okay, so I got it up on the network by replacing sk98lin with the one from 2.4.26. While I'm pretty confident that's not a supported thing to do, the machine is pretty useless to me off the network. I know I could throw a supported adapter in it, but it works as is. By the way, my intention is to get a native amd64 distribution of Linux running and my preference is that it be a RedHat derivative. I am not able to tell from the cAos web site whether there are any plans to release an amd64 version of Centos. The only reference I see to that platform is in the FAQ and looks specific to cAos. There are amd64 sources on RedHat's web site for rhel3. My experience of Centos so far is of it being i386 centric. So, the problem I hit. I installed Centos-3 using the iso images onto a couple of SCSI drives I have in the system, then got the 2.4.21-15 kernel update and enabled SATA support. Through a series of modprobes, I got it to recognize the drive. However, it didn't find a valid partition table, and the geometry is way off. My SATA disk is a WD740GD, a 74GB drive. Fdisk thinks it is 30MB, 255 heads, 63 sector/track, 3 cylinders. Have I done something wrong, or is the VIA SATA support in this kernel just not gonna hack it? The SK8V uses the VIA VT8237 southbridge chipset if anyone knows about this. Thanks for any help. -- C. Linus Hicks <lhicks(a)nc.rr.com>

1 1

What is the update version of CentOS-2?
by jack＠leadershipbynumbers.com 31 May '04

31 May '04

I'm pretty sure that I'm not asking the question correctly, but I'd like to host a database that is supported with RedHat Enterprise Linux 2.1 with Update 2 (Q2 2003), so I'm assuming CentOS-2 fills the bill. However, when I run this application, I get some weird CPU cycling that I can't trace to any specific task. So, perhaps my install is not as current as I think it is. I have run yum for both upgrade and update. Thanks, Jack Jack(a)skillstogrowon.com

2 1

Tape drive problems
by syv 30 May '04

30 May '04

Hi, Hi, I have been googling, and can't find anything that will help me: mt -f /dev/st0 status /dev/st0: No such device or address Any suggestion? I am using CentOS 3 [RHEL ES3 without the licenses] The tape drive is recognized at boot [from dmesg] scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.36 <Adaptec 29160 Ultra160 SCSI adapter> aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs blk: queue d3e53014, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff) (scsi0:A:11): 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 32, 16bit) Vendor: EXABYTE Model: VXA-2 Rev: 100E Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 blk: queue d37a7e14, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff) st: Version 20030406, bufsize 32768, max init. bufs 4, s/g segs 16 Attached scsi tape st0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 11, lun 0 scsi : 0 hosts left. I also get: cat /proc/scsi/scsi Attached devices: none dir -l /proc/scsi/scsi -r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 May 26 16:23 /proc/scsi/scsi Here is the output of lsmod: Module Size Used by Not tainted nls_iso8859-1 3516 0 (autoclean) nls_cp437 5148 0 (autoclean) vfat 13036 0 (autoclean) fat 38872 0 (autoclean) [vfat] raid1 15020 0 (unused) raid0 3976 0 (unused) linear 2088 0 (unused) loop 12120 0 ide-tape 53264 0 (autoclean) soundcore 6468 0 (autoclean) st 31716 0 (autoclean) ide-cd 35680 0 (autoclean) cdrom 33696 0 (autoclean) [ide-cd] autofs 13364 0 (autoclean) (unused) e1000 76096 1 floppy 58160 0 (autoclean) sg 36972 0 (autoclean) scsi_mod 110376 2 (autoclean) [st sg] microcode 5848 0 (autoclean) keybdev 2976 0 (unused) mousedev 5524 0 hid 22212 0 (unused) input 5920 0 [keybdev mousedev hid] ehci-hcd 20136 0 (unused) usb-uhci 26412 0 (unused) usbcore 79424 1 [hid ehci-hcd usb-uhci] ext3 88104 2 jbd 52464 2 [ext3] Here is the kernel: uname -r 2.4.21-15.EL.c0 -- Thanks centos(a)911networks.com When the network has to work

3 4

LHA security vulnerabilities
by khaled fawzy 30 May '04

30 May '04

Dear sir; i am using redhat 9 on a production server and i plan to migrate to centos 3.1. the issue now is redhat 9 vulnerable to LHA package security vulnerabilities . and if so how can i solve this vulnerabilities till i implemment the upgrade. thanks in advance.

3 2

CentOS-2 errata
by John Newbigin 27 May '04

27 May '04

The following errata for CentOS-2 have been built and uploaded the the centos mirror RHSA-2004:174 Updated utempter package fixes vulnerability RHSA-2004:178 An updated LHA package fixes security vulnerabilities RHSA-2004:219 Updated tcpdump packages fix various vulnerabilities John. -- John Newbigin - Computer Systems Officer School of Information Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia http://www.it.swin.edu.au/staff/jnewbigin

1 0

Removing older kernel packages
by Taco Scargo 26 May '04

26 May '04

Hello, I have problems removing older kernels from my Centos machines using yum. Can somebody tell me how to remove specific versions ? [root@web2 root]# rpm -qa | grep kernel-2 kernel-2.4.21-15.EL.c0 kernel-2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.c0 kernel-2.4.21-9.0.3.EL.c0 Is what I have installed.... And [root@web2 root]# yum remove kernel-2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.c0 Gathering header information file(s) from server(s) Server: CentOS-3.1 - Addons Server: CentOS-3.1 - Base Server: CentOS-3.1 - Extras Server: CentOS-3.1 - Updates Finding updated packages Downloading needed headers Erase: No matches for kernel-2.4.21-9.0.1.EL.c0 No actions to take is what I get. Thanks, Taco

3 3

Updated utempter package fixes vulnerability
by Lance Davis 26 May '04

26 May '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an update to utempter for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-174.html refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/utempter-0.5.5-1.3EL.0.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/utempter-0.5.5-1.3EL.0.arc.rpm These are available at http://mirror.centos.org/3.1/ and should be on all mirrors within a few hours. To update to the latest version 'yum update utempter' should be sufficient. Lance -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAtItGcEnkTQJeUTsRAqEhAJ43iSV6tLFprunPifl2ruDGKtOwkgCfemDS Qx9IC/AnaJLQgCxT0K0RWCg= =p2Vi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.

1 0

Updated LHA package fixes security vulnerabilities
by Lance Davis 26 May '04

26 May '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an update to LHA for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-178.html refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/lha-1.14i-10.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/lha-1.14i-10.2.src.rpm These are available at http://mirror.centos.org/3.1/ and should be on all mirrors within a few hours. To update to the latest version 'yum update lha' should be sufficient. Lance -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAtIrDcEnkTQJeUTsRAtvwAJ0X6meTPh2v8agr6X6TbmFdUC+NlACdFu/K Dz9JST2qg003nEKmSOZzWRM= =vDUt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.

1 0

Updated tcpdump package fixes various vulnerabilities
by Lance Davis 26 May '04

26 May '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is an update to tcpdump for CentOS 3.1 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2004-219.html refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/tcpdump-3.7.2-7.E3.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/libpcap-0.7.2-7.E3.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/tcpdump-3.7.2-7.E3.2.src.rpm These are available at http://mirror.centos.org/3.1/ and should be on all mirrors within a few hours. To update to the latest version 'yum update tcpdump libpcap' should be sufficient. Lance -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAtIpCcEnkTQJeUTsRAmxwAJ9/gtwpj9jun4f6yRQEZX2zePiOTwCeIBse mToK5gmpULQecvATCOYulps= =yvBc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.

1 0

Q: No Reiserfs in Kernel
by Tech Support 24 May '04

24 May '04

Hello, I have a quick question. I am currious why reiserfs isn't compiled into the kernel? Although RHEL doesn't include the tools to manage reiserfs it includes the kernel drivers. Thanks, Bill

3 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Discuss